Quote:
Originally Posted by SooperFish24
There s a flaw in using the lottery as an example. The lottery is just a lucky draw whereas poker is a skill game with an element of luck, the two are not comparable.
Well, the guy complaining used a lack of skill to get into his situations, but that is not really the point.
The scenarios are quite similar. When something semi strange happens, people notice and assign beliefs to the event even when strange events have to happen as part of any random system.
Frankly, this guy's situation is not even that bizarre, he played 2 hands badly in the same way. All it showed was he does not learn much from his mistakes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SooperFish24
If someone from the same small town won the lottery for a few weeks in a row you could say something is up.
That would be an example of flawed logic and thinking, and it pretty much sums up why you are basically a standard rigtard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SooperFish24
Well Ive never seen anyone say that but I would disagree with anyone who did so NO!
I thought I answered you last time on this. I believe that small stacks are helped out in cash games not tournaments.
Incase you missed that NO NO NO.
See, now this is interesting. You dismiss another rigged theory even though it is based on the exact same methodology, basically people who have seen something happen a lot and know something is wrong.
Yet you use the same method of gathering "data" and genuinely wonder why people basically say NO NO NO to your theories.
You are entitled to any beliefs you like, my only suggestion to you is that you start using better rigged theory selection. At least choose ones that do not directly contradict other common rigged theories, and choose ones that cannot be easily disproven (ie: the everyone breaks even theory)
Better rigged theory selection will lead to more fun arguments on your side. I suggest starting easy with flush draws hit too much then working up to stuff like deposit/withdraw and new player curses/benefits.
All the best.