Quote:
Originally Posted by SooperFish24
Yeah it says Rigged. So what.
If it said 100% absolute certainty no doubt rigged I could see your point Aaron T.
Interesting rationalization.
So, unless someone adds "100% absolute certainty no doubt" before making a statement of fact, it does not mean that made a statement of fact.
Do you even think about how stuff like this sounds before you say it?
Correction, do you 100% absolute certainty no doubt think how this stuff sounds before you say it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SooperFish24
Is that where you play? Im sorry I have no experience of the play money tables.
I certainly have played at play money tables when starting at a new room to get a feel for the software. Safe to say the play lacks any meaning , so I suspect it would take you about 20 hands to determine it was rigged based on your beliefs.
Micro stakes are only a bit better in this regard, and I do find it funny that you regard bad play by bad players at micro stakes that once in a while get rewarded as a sign of it being rigged, instead of just bad players playing badly.
Sometimes something is just what it seems even if a major conspiracy makes it more interesting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SooperFish24
Yes but this is not coin tossing. I havent lost overcards vs underpair 9 times in a row i.e coinflip. If you throw a four sided dice 1000 times its very unlikely to land on the same side 10 times in a row.
Yes they did happen in that order.
Another poster with a poor grasp of probability.
Clearly you do not have actual data that can be verified, rather it is just what you remember, and frankly that is never a good source of "proof," particularly when a person has an agenda to fill as well.
You saying "yes it happened" does not mean anything in terms of evidence, even if you believe it did happen.
Your last point about a poster not understanding probability is ironic in that it is accurate, though not in the way you may think.
The two possibilities are the following:
1) A microstakes player using his memory does not get all of his facts straight about his bad beats
2) A major poker site has a team of people targeting this micro stakes player by inflicting bad beats on him.
Which of these two options seems more likely...
Hint, with 100% absolute certainty no doubt it is choice 1
P.S. Do you create similar paranoid conspiracy beliefs in any other aspects of life when something unlucky takes place?
Last edited by Monteroy; 02-03-2009 at 08:27 PM.