Quote:
Originally Posted by bugzy
the rebuy period last 15 minutes[...]compare each tables hands for the first 15 minutes, lets assume each table is dealt around 20 or 30 hands to each player in this time
20-30 hands in 15 minutes in a MTT? I could be wrong, since I've never played the $1 rebuy Sunday Millions satellite, but that seems waaaaaay too high.
Quote:
my proposal is that anyone of these tables in that first 15 minute time frame will produce a higher number of premium hands than any of the first 20 or 30 hands dealt at the final table of any sunday millions game.
Okie doke.
Quote:
and compare with any or all the final tables of the sunday millions first 20 or 30 hands.
So now you want to compare 30 hands against 450,000 to see if there's anything wrong with the stats?
Quote:
There will not be a single table that doesnt produce far more premium starting hands in these satelites, than the final table of the sunday millions. This will prove pokerstars are manipulating the RNG.
And now sample size has just gone completely out the window. Now you're just saying "If you compare any of the starting tables in a satellite to the final table of the Sunday Millions, you'll see more premium hands".
Quote:
You may ask why would they do this? Simple, if 300 people buy into a rebuy satelite thats $300, thats only one buy in to the sunday millions with a fee of $15 for every $215 buy in, so the more action the satelites generate the more rebuys, at the end of the rebuy period ther will be more like $1500 thats 6 or 7 tickets into the sunday millions with 6 or 7 buy in fees of $15 totalling $100, so for every $1 turbo satelite to the sunday millions, pokerstars has found a way to generate a larger cash intake, by creating more action.
The $1 hyper turbos aren't raked at all, so it seems like a lot of work for them to go through to maybe make $100, when they could easily have a few $5+.50s or something where they got rake from the satellite and from the tourney.
Quote:
Pokerstars manipulates the RNG and the seed, depending on the game, all cleverly designed to generate more income in different ways, but all that is needed is to prove one, the satalites comparison with sunday millions will do this. Do you really think an online gaming site would leave their profit margins to chance, everything they do is designed to make money. Thats why they make so much. Any site which claims to be fair by stating that there RNG is completley random when in fact there is proof it is not, and it is defrauding people every day out of thousands of pounds, millions every year, needs to be fully investigated, the evidence is there, if you analyse and compare the correct games, and dont allow them to give you a random sample of hands for analysis.
What do you think of
Cigital's audit of PokerStars hands for the entire month of December 2008?