It will be a great day when you get banned.

Bad beats at pokerstars yihaaaaa i've like 1284 hands in a row to trow away 2/3.4/2.6/2 ... i emaild them and they said to me you can have that for months?? i thought this site is rigged and what i found out is that they have pokerbots on the site believe it or not!!!! i saw the game play how tight it was i followed the guy(bot) and the same game play over and over again! never play on PS with real money i still play there but not to win its on the play money tables and even there i lose all the time.
pokerstar is rigged thats final!! i told support(the biggest losers of them all) that they have to get the game togetter but now they dont even send email to me no ads nothing!

Look at the river and the flush,straight,full house, and even straight flush days its if you can look in the future on PS 2sec on a table and you see what day it is out of 10 hands in a row are 8 str or fh or fl how is that possible the card dealing is random?? i just cant understand the random part in PS.

S&G's Tourney's are players pickt out to win (the lucky seats) and they are there your DOOOOOOOMED from the beginning i hate PS policy

THEY CHEAT AND NOT MOST PLAYERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thats all folks for now! i'll be bk
sorry for my bad english.

Welcome to the forums.

Quality post.

Can someone explain this sentence? The cards let you look in the future and see what day it is? Wat?

Clearly we have a large enough sample size to now know that poor grammar and nonsensical ramblings by rigtards are not purely coincidental.

The funniest thing about this post is that he edited it to correct it. Can't imagine what it could have said the first time!

By the way, if you can't beat play money, perhaps poker isn't for you yet. Read the microstakes forums, get a few books, then try again.

I've been published!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=feldzpar

This is the best part. "I thought a guy was a bot so I followed him around and he played the same everywhere! Obvious bot!"

wouldn't dealing less hands mean less profit?
then how do they buy chips?
so? how does that help B&M Casinos make more money without cheating them? wouldn't it be better to rig the games against casual players with no way to keep careful records?
so? they deal less hands - thus the online poker rooms can make more money.
yes, but why wouldn't they rig those games too?
fixed.

So, can you explain for me how "real" casinos have managed to be profitable for well over 25 years without cheating customers and why online poker rooms have no choice but to resort to such tactics in order to make money?

So much comic failure between these two ^


Quote:
people dont go to a casino to deposit
then how do they buy chips?
Quote:
its mostly tourists who drop off their money
so? how does that help B&M Casinos make more money without cheating them? wouldn't it be better to rig the games against casual players with no way to keep careful records?
Quote:
casinos have higher rake
so? they deal less hands - thus the online poker rooms can make more money.
Quote:
casinos have other revenues
yes, but why wouldn't they rig those games too?

Did anyone ever find out which vulgar word is censored here (with the suffix "en")?
Hahahaha, damn solid definition.

irony can be ironic sometimes.

I have a question. I'm more of a reader than a poster; I read this forum a lot because it gives me a good laugh... Would never bother posting in it in most cases but I am curious about something...

Why is it that well respected, logical thinkers, and [probably] successful players (DMoogle, NFuego, etc.) bother trying to explain the facts and debate with these rigtards? It is a lost cause friends.

I don't really try to explain the facts and debate; I mostly just point out obvious flaws in their arguments. I love arguing anyway, especially since I'm usually right.

It's important that we all do our bit from time to time on this thread.

If we didn't the rigtards would have it to themselves and any new forum member who chanced upon the thread might gain the impression that rigging is an accepted fact.

I don't think anyone on the debunking (of riggedness) side posts all the time. We all take breaks but there are enough to ensure that at any one time the rigtards don't get it all their own way.

Only if you agree with my thinking which I think is most of the time.

200nl on stars is the riggity!
its unbeatable its there to charge rake its true, they make all the regs grind for no winrate so they can get rake. I HAZ PROOFFFFFFS they is sucking out on me

I guess I am seen as a rigtard but I know that I am a logical thinker. My results on stars have varied so wildly from expectation that collectively you could call my run a rare event. Rare events don't happen- that is a precept of probability. So I engage with the defenders of pokerstars here about why they hold their beliefs about the integrity of the game. And it is a belief, not knowledge. No one has ever proved that any poker site is not rigged. In the back of my mind I think most likely I was just running bad on stars, and I suspect most of the "rigtards" here think the same thing deep down, but it is fun to speculate since (having never been proved either way) it is an open question.

People post in this thread for intellectual exercise and/or fun, not to convince people of changing their minds, which is rare event.

This is a good point. I hadn't thought of it that way.

I don't think I have the patience for it, but I'm glad that some do.

This thread is, for the most part, a good deal of fun and an interesting exercise in logical thinking. It shows an interesting relationship between perception and reality, and forces us to really think about poker statistics, expectation, and variance. In fact, I've actually learned quite a bit from this thread in terms of statistics and how to think about variance.

And I still get a a kick out of all these accusations without the slightest bit of evidence - scratch that, there's lots of "slight" evidence, just very little convincing evidence. This is surprising since it is so easy for players to get their hand histories and analyze them in a somewhat sophisticated manner, even with limited statistical skills.

yeah, no reason to ever think anything but a completely fair game is being dealt. what was I ever thinking to question the ethics of an unregulated online poker company

just diverge diverge diverge never merge. how many hands is the long run? obviously not 70,000.

Important Update:

lol best update ever thank you woooo^^^