Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > > >

Discussion of Poker Sites General discussion of online poker sites.

View Poll Results: Is Online Poker Rigged?
Yes 3,445 34.94%
No 5,522 56.00%
Undecided 893 9.06%
Voters: 9860. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2009, 12:36 AM   #7651
Lestat
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,995
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by NFuego20 View Post
So how do you explain my being up 6 figures lifetime at online poker?
You realize that it's possible to obtain a profit while still being cheated, right?
Lestat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:41 AM   #7652
Josem
human chemical weapon
 
Josem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Getting Trolled
Posts: 17,957
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Hey, I haven't read the last page or so, but see there's a lot more typing and words and stuff.

Does that mean someone has provided some evidence to support their claims? Or is it just baseless ranting about some hypothetical international conspiracy?
Josem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 02:02 AM   #7653
NFuego20
Pooh-Bah
 
NFuego20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 4,295
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat View Post
You realize that it's possible to obtain a profit while still being cheated, right?
Of course, but the way some of these people formulate their arguments, that's not what it's about.

There are a few people on here who approach this subject with some rational thinking and open mindedness, and then others who think there are magical poker bots and RNGs that are designed to suck up all their money. It's a wide spectrum.

I just find it funny how when some people lose on a sick hand, that money goes to another player who is a proven loser based on online databases, your own history with them, etc etc. We love to remember the hands they win but don't think twice when they stack off for 300 bb in a half hour session and leave.
NFuego20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 02:05 AM   #7654
NFuego20
Pooh-Bah
 
NFuego20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 4,295
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem View Post
Hey, I haven't read the last page or so, but see there's a lot more typing and words and stuff.

Does that mean someone has provided some evidence to support their claims? Or is it just baseless ranting about some hypothetical international conspiracy?
I think lately the discussion is about your site employing superuser bots to suck up people's money.

If you could just let us know the screen names of those bots that would help us avoid them at the tables.
NFuego20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 02:06 AM   #7655
Markusgc
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Markusgc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Noodles, Hockey & Punk Rock!
Posts: 8,788
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOfFelt View Post
Are hitman4hire and rounding4rent the same person?
probably not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOfFelt
Also, isn't one of them Steven Meares?
definitely
Quote:
Either way they be some crazy mofo'(s). I wonder what it would be like to spend a day in their messed up mind(s).
the very idea of that hurts my brain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMoogle View Post
I don't have the know-how, nor the curiosity to perform statistical analysis. Maybe it is rigged, I can't say for sure. I just doubt it, and think most of the people who are convinced it is are stupid
here's where this quote should go...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rounding4Rent View Post
amen to that brotha.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spadebidder View Post
I'll bet Jack knew how to spell variance.
lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem View Post
Hey, I haven't read the last page or so, but see there's a lot more typing and words and stuff.

Does that mean someone has provided some evidence to support their claims? Or is it just baseless ranting about some hypothetical international conspiracy?
we'll let you know when it's more than "patterns" only rigtards can see or the popular consensus on the short bus, I mean the local cardroom.
Markusgc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 04:32 AM   #7656
qpw
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pulling the tails of rigtards
Posts: 4,019
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOfFelt View Post
Either way they be some crazy mofo'(s). I wonder what it would be like to spend a day in their messed up mind(s).
I'd stick with John Malkovich.
qpw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 04:32 AM   #7657
qpw
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pulling the tails of rigtards
Posts: 4,019
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markusgc View Post
we'll let you know when it's more than "patterns" only rigtards can see or the popular consensus on the short bus, I mean the local cardroom.
'stiming, innit?
qpw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 08:09 AM   #7658
hitman4hire
banned
 
hitman4hire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Getting Drunk Getting Infractions
Posts: 1,075
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markusgc View Post
probably not.

definitely

the very idea of that hurts my brain.

here's where this quote should go...


lol

we'll let you know when it's more than "patterns" only rigtards can see or the popular consensus on the short bus, I mean the local cardroom.
LLLLoooooLLL u shills get more creative it seems
I am also a winning player a VIP on my site.
I am still entitiled to my opinion. about other sites right?
hitman4hire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 08:25 AM   #7659
Noir_Desir
veteran
 
Noir_Desir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: qui
Posts: 2,333
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman4hire View Post
Why are they not transparent ie provide statistics for any customer to analize.What is there to hide?
yeah, would make perfect sense to forbid datamining and then hand out billions of handhistories to any customer who wants to carry out said analization (scnr).
Noir_Desir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 08:31 AM   #7660
qpw
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pulling the tails of rigtards
Posts: 4,019
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman4hire View Post
LLLLoooooLLL u shills get more creative it seems.
You still shilling for RealDeal?

Quote:
I am also a winning player a VIP on my site.
Your site?

You mean the one that exists only in your imagination.

The only place in the entire universe where you can be a winner.

Quote:
I am still entitiled to my opinion. about other sites right?
Yup, and we're still entitled to ignore it as the ravings of big time loser.

Have a nice day.
qpw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 08:38 AM   #7661
Monteroy
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,099
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman4hire View Post
LLLLoooooLLL u shills get more creative it seems
I am also a winning player a VIP on my site.
I am still entitiled to my opinion. about other sites right?
What happens when someone playing at "your site" whatever site that is has a bad beat and whines in the chat that it is rigged? Do you think they are wrong? If so, does that make you a shill?

Every site has paranoid people who think it is rigged against them, I am sure "your site" is no different. Likely just a matter of time before you start noticing special patterns as well at "your site."

Still, the concept of a riggedologist being a "shill" is kind of quaint. What would the other riggedologists think? Why not post the details about "your site" and let's see if all the riggedologists agree with you that it is a perfectly legit site.
Monteroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 11:39 AM   #7662
DonkoTheClown
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 741
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Ughhh, my head is spinning. I had someone at Pstars send me the link to my hand history from that site. It looks like more than 60k of hands. I started saving the new hand history data to my hard drive. Here is a little sample of what I keep running in to while playing at Pstars. I have dropped way down into the micro limits so that I can afford to play and take beats like these as I am collecting data...No wonder why the Riggedologists give up on their research, this is not going to be easy for someone who is new to examining this amount of data...

PokerStars Game #31569558997: Tournament #186819466, $1.00+$0.20 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2009/08/13 0:32:57 ET
Table '186819466 2' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: calinam (20430 in chips)
Seat 2: Aggsliota (5510 in chips)
Seat 3: Newising (3510 in chips)
Seat 4: JDtheDean (8450 in chips)
Seat 5: billstone420 (10360 in chips)
Seat 6: celtic jim (5405 in chips)
Seat 7: AAintheblind (5550 in chips)
Seat 8: UhOh_It'sJoe (5115 in chips)
Seat 9: KINGS1001 (3170 in chips)
calinam: posts the ante 25
Aggsliota: posts the ante 25
Newising: posts the ante 25
JDtheDean: posts the ante 25
billstone420: posts the ante 25
celtic jim: posts the ante 25
AAintheblind: posts the ante 25
UhOh_It'sJoe: posts the ante 25
KINGS1001: posts the ante 25
UhOh_It'sJoe: posts small blind 200
KINGS1001: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to UhOh_It'sJoe [Ks Kh]
calinam: raises 800 to 1200
Aggsliota: folds
Newising: folds
JDtheDean: folds
billstone420: folds
celtic jim: folds
AAintheblind: folds
UhOh_It'sJoe: raises 3890 to 5090 and is all-in
KINGS1001: folds
calinam: calls 3890
*** FLOP *** [Js Ah 5d]
*** TURN *** [Js Ah 5d] [7c]
*** RIVER *** [Js Ah 5d 7c] [9s]
UhOh_It'sJoe said, "lol"
*** SHOW DOWN ***
UhOh_It'sJoe: shows [Ks Kh] (a pair of Kings)
calinam: shows [7d Ad] (two pair, Aces and Sevens)
calinam collected 10805 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 10805 | Rake 0
Board [Js Ah 5d 7c 9s]
Seat 1: calinam showed [7d Ad] and won (10805) with two pair, Aces and Sevens
Seat 2: Aggsliota folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Newising folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: JDtheDean folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: billstone420 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: celtic jim folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: AAintheblind (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: UhOh_It'sJoe (small blind) showed [Ks Kh] and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 9: KINGS1001 (big blind) folded before Flop
DonkoTheClown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 11:52 AM   #7663
Arouet
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Arouet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,433
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkoTheClown View Post
Ughhh, my head is spinning. I had someone at Pstars send me the link to my hand history from that site. It looks like more than 60k of hands. I started saving the new hand history data to my hard drive. Here is a little sample of what I keep running in to while playing at Pstars. I have dropped way down into the micro limits so that I can afford to play and take beats like these as I am collecting data...No wonder why the Riggedologists give up on their research, this is not going to be easy for someone who is new to examining this amount of data...

PokerStars Game #31569558997: Tournament #186819466, $1.00+$0.20 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2009/08/13 0:32:57 ET
Table '186819466 2' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: calinam (20430 in chips)
Seat 2: Aggsliota (5510 in chips)
Seat 3: Newising (3510 in chips)
Seat 4: JDtheDean (8450 in chips)
Seat 5: billstone420 (10360 in chips)
Seat 6: celtic jim (5405 in chips)
Seat 7: AAintheblind (5550 in chips)
Seat 8: UhOh_It'sJoe (5115 in chips)
Seat 9: KINGS1001 (3170 in chips)
calinam: posts the ante 25
Aggsliota: posts the ante 25
Newising: posts the ante 25
JDtheDean: posts the ante 25
billstone420: posts the ante 25
celtic jim: posts the ante 25
AAintheblind: posts the ante 25
UhOh_It'sJoe: posts the ante 25
KINGS1001: posts the ante 25
UhOh_It'sJoe: posts small blind 200
KINGS1001: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to UhOh_It'sJoe [Ks Kh]
calinam: raises 800 to 1200
Aggsliota: folds
Newising: folds
JDtheDean: folds
billstone420: folds
celtic jim: folds
AAintheblind: folds
UhOh_It'sJoe: raises 3890 to 5090 and is all-in
KINGS1001: folds
calinam: calls 3890
*** FLOP *** [Js Ah 5d]
*** TURN *** [Js Ah 5d] [7c]
*** RIVER *** [Js Ah 5d 7c] [9s]
UhOh_It'sJoe said, "lol"
*** SHOW DOWN ***
UhOh_It'sJoe: shows [Ks Kh] (a pair of Kings)
calinam: shows [7d Ad] (two pair, Aces and Sevens)
calinam collected 10805 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 10805 | Rake 0
Board [Js Ah 5d 7c 9s]
Seat 1: calinam showed [7d Ad] and won (10805) with two pair, Aces and Sevens
Seat 2: Aggsliota folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Newising folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: JDtheDean folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: billstone420 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: celtic jim folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: AAintheblind (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: UhOh_It'sJoe (small blind) showed [Ks Kh] and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 9: KINGS1001 (big blind) folded before Flop
It's great that you are actually analyzing your hands. However, don't do it on a hand by hand basis, but on an aggregate. For example there is nothing shocking about this hand:

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

1,712,304 games 0.047 secs 36,432,000 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 67.413% 67.24% 00.17% 1151386 2933.00 { KhKs }
Hand 1: 32.587% 32.42% 00.17% 555052 2933.00 { Ad7d }


---
Arouet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 11:59 AM   #7664
NFuego20
Pooh-Bah
 
NFuego20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 4,295
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkoTheClown View Post
Ughhh, my head is spinning. I had someone at Pstars send me the link to my hand history from that site. It looks like more than 60k of hands. I started saving the new hand history data to my hard drive. Here is a little sample of what I keep running in to while playing at Pstars. I have dropped way down into the micro limits so that I can afford to play and take beats like these as I am collecting data...No wonder why the Riggedologists give up on their research, this is not going to be easy for someone who is new to examining this amount of data...

PokerStars Game #31569558997: Tournament #186819466, $1.00+$0.20 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2009/08/13 0:32:57 ET
Table '186819466 2' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: calinam (20430 in chips)
Seat 2: Aggsliota (5510 in chips)
Seat 3: Newising (3510 in chips)
Seat 4: JDtheDean (8450 in chips)
Seat 5: billstone420 (10360 in chips)
Seat 6: celtic jim (5405 in chips)
Seat 7: AAintheblind (5550 in chips)
Seat 8: UhOh_It'sJoe (5115 in chips)
Seat 9: KINGS1001 (3170 in chips)
calinam: posts the ante 25
Aggsliota: posts the ante 25
Newising: posts the ante 25
JDtheDean: posts the ante 25
billstone420: posts the ante 25
celtic jim: posts the ante 25
AAintheblind: posts the ante 25
UhOh_It'sJoe: posts the ante 25
KINGS1001: posts the ante 25
UhOh_It'sJoe: posts small blind 200
KINGS1001: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to UhOh_It'sJoe [Ks Kh]
calinam: raises 800 to 1200
Aggsliota: folds
Newising: folds
JDtheDean: folds
billstone420: folds
celtic jim: folds
AAintheblind: folds
UhOh_It'sJoe: raises 3890 to 5090 and is all-in
KINGS1001: folds
calinam: calls 3890
*** FLOP *** [Js Ah 5d]
*** TURN *** [Js Ah 5d] [7c]
*** RIVER *** [Js Ah 5d 7c] [9s]
UhOh_It'sJoe said, "lol"
*** SHOW DOWN ***
UhOh_It'sJoe: shows [Ks Kh] (a pair of Kings)
calinam: shows [7d Ad] (two pair, Aces and Sevens)
calinam collected 10805 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 10805 | Rake 0
Board [Js Ah 5d 7c 9s]
Seat 1: calinam showed [7d Ad] and won (10805) with two pair, Aces and Sevens
Seat 2: Aggsliota folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Newising folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: JDtheDean folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: billstone420 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: celtic jim folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: AAintheblind (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: UhOh_It'sJoe (small blind) showed [Ks Kh] and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 9: KINGS1001 (big blind) folded before Flop
The only thing that hand history tells me is your competition is weak. To even think that the games might be rigged as a result of seeing this completely standard hand is ridiculous.

http://twodimes.net/poker/?g=h&b=&d=&h=Ad+7d%0D%0AKs+Kh

Losing this hand is about as likely as Ichiro getting a hit in one of his at bats.

Please get out of the habit of looking at hands like this as significant. If you play often enough it's going to happen to you every single day, multiple times per day. If you get all in in a tournament as this big a favorite three times before you reach the money part of the tournament, odds are you will be eliminated. That's not to say you shouldn't be getting it in, but those are the breaks sometimes. Now, if you could show me that you got all in 1000 times as a 2 to 1 favorite and only won a third of them, we'd be on to something.

Also, your biggest disadvantage is probably playing a game that has a 20% rake. Maybe the low level of play in the $1 sng is enough to make up for the doubled % rake, I have no idea.
NFuego20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:07 PM   #7665
DonkoTheClown
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 741
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by DMoogle View Post
Oh yeah and here's an easy way to test the theory of big stacks winning more than their share in tournaments: play a HU SnG with your testing partner, have one of you be the designated big stack and the other the designated short stack, have the short stack raise/fold first hand so stacks are uneven, then on the second hand have both of you go all-in. Rinse and repeat until you have a legitimate sample size, test how each person is running using some EV software.
This sounds like a pretty good idea to me. You might want to do this at the micro stakes level because the site is going to grind a fee. After thousands of hands, it is going to add up. But...this might be a good investment if it answers your questions because playing and thinking that a site might be rigged sure effects your game. It is like playing with scared money, it just doesnt work...
DonkoTheClown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:10 PM   #7666
DonkoTheClown
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 741
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arouet View Post
It's great that you are actually analyzing your hands. However, don't do it on a hand by hand basis, but on an aggregate. For example there is nothing shocking about this hand:

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

1,712,304 games 0.047 secs 36,432,000 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 67.413% 67.24% 00.17% 1151386 2933.00 { KhKs }
Hand 1: 32.587% 32.42% 00.17% 555052 2933.00 { Ad7d }


---
No, not shocking, just annoying that it keeps happening over and over at the worst possible times to either bust me or cripple me. I am not claiming this is proof, but I am looking for help to make the hand analysis easier to deal with. So can I load my data into pokerstove? It is looking like I can only get it from the site in plain text form.
DonkoTheClown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:16 PM   #7667
DonkoTheClown
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 741
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by NFuego20 View Post
The only thing that hand history tells me is your competition is weak. To even think that the games might be rigged as a result of seeing this completely standard hand is ridiculous.

http://twodimes.net/poker/?g=h&b=&d=&h=Ad+7d%0D%0AKs+Kh

Losing this hand is about as likely as Ichiro getting a hit in one of his at bats.

Please get out of the habit of looking at hands like this as significant. If you play often enough it's going to happen to you every single day, multiple times per day. If you get all in in a tournament as this big a favorite three times before you reach the money part of the tournament, odds are you will be eliminated. That's not to say you shouldn't be getting it in, but those are the breaks sometimes. Now, if you could show me that you got all in 1000 times as a 2 to 1 favorite and only won a third of them, we'd be on to something.

Also, your biggest disadvantage is probably playing a game that has a 20% rake. Maybe the low level of play in the $1 sng is enough to make up for the doubled % rake, I have no idea.
I dropped way down so that I could afford to log a significant amount of hand histories. I am not so concerned about my ROI at this point, I want to see if I am getting a fair shake on this site because my original feeling playing higher up was that something was wrong with how the cards were falling against me.

I agree with you, AA, KK, QQ, they are just hands. I try to avoid pre flop all in situations and work from flops, but it all depends upon the who I am up against and a lot of other factors. Bottom line is that there are times when it is smarter to just fold these hands even if you are way ahead pre flop. If you look at my history on this site, you can see that I have won some tournaments and had some decent cashes, but I obviously still have some holes in my game and I also want to see if one of my leaks is the pokersite itself.
DonkoTheClown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:22 PM   #7668
DonkoTheClown
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 741
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arouet View Post
Also, and more importantly, Spadebidder has posted some preliminary data in his huge billion hand study of some general card distribution that comes out according to expectation.

The general card distribution, I believe, is more important than any one person's graph in determining whether the RNG is rigged.
I would love to see this study. I am hoping Spadebidder will also post those results. Thanks for any info like this!
DonkoTheClown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:26 PM   #7669
DonkoTheClown
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 741
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by NFuego20 View Post
The only thing that hand history tells me is your competition is weak. To even think that the games might be rigged as a result of seeing this completely standard hand is ridiculous.

http://twodimes.net/poker/?g=h&b=&d=&h=Ad+7d%0D%0AKs+Kh

Losing this hand is about as likely as Ichiro getting a hit in one of his at bats.

Please get out of the habit of looking at hands like this as significant. If you play often enough it's going to happen to you every single day, multiple times per day. If you get all in in a tournament as this big a favorite three times before you reach the money part of the tournament, odds are you will be eliminated. That's not to say you shouldn't be getting it in, but those are the breaks sometimes. Now, if you could show me that you got all in 1000 times as a 2 to 1 favorite and only won a third of them, we'd be on to something.

Also, your biggest disadvantage is probably playing a game that has a 20% rake. Maybe the low level of play in the $1 sng is enough to make up for the doubled % rake, I have no idea.
I did notice that pstars has a 25 cent 90 player game with no fee. I should probably load as many of these up at once as I can. This would give me more hand histories for my dollar. LOL!

I am not worried about the level of play right now, I just want to see scenario's like all in with the best hand while on the short stack, situations like those.
DonkoTheClown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:28 PM   #7670
hitman4hire
banned
 
hitman4hire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Getting Drunk Getting Infractions
Posts: 1,075
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by qpw View Post
You still shilling for RealDeal?



Your site?

You mean the one that exists only in your imagination.

The only place in the entire universe where you can be a winner.



Yup, and we're still entitled to ignore it as the ravings of big time loser.

Have a nice day.
LLLLLLLLLLLooooooooooLLLLLLLL
Im not hard to find at 5/10...But my intelect forbides me to engage with mindless fools who play on unregulated sites and trust them with money no matter how big or small That have cheated customers one way or another in the past and STILL continue to operate.
Good day sir.
PS love the zoo always GTD a jolly laugh
hitman4hire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:29 PM   #7671
Arouet
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Arouet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,433
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkoTheClown View Post
No, not shocking, just annoying that it keeps happening over and over at the worst possible times to either bust me or cripple me. I am not claiming this is proof, but I am looking for help to make the hand analysis easier to deal with. So can I load my data into pokerstove? It is looking like I can only get it from the site in plain text form.
No, pokerstove (which is free) just lets you plug in hands and see results. I suggest you download becuase it will help your game to play around with it. You can put in hand ranges to find out your equity for any given hand.

For better analysis without a statistics degree, you'll need a tracking program like pokertracker or HEM, both have free trials. There are free trackers out there that you can find from google.

Obviously for the more advanced analysis you need some expertise in spreadsheets, statistical analysis like Spacebidder and QPW have. They have posted in this thread some basic guidelines on what to look for.
Arouet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:41 PM   #7672
DonkoTheClown
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 741
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman4hire View Post
LLLLLLLLLLLooooooooooLLLLLLLL
Im not hard to find at 5/10...But my intelect forbides me to engage with mindless fools who play on unregulated sites and trust them with money no matter how big or small That have cheated customers one way or another in the past and STILL continue to operate.
Good day sir.
PS love the zoo always GTD a jolly laugh
I would like to know which site you are on so that I could try it out. I am guessing that US players are not allowed on it though...Maybe I will just move to your country and play there though...LOL!
DonkoTheClown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:45 PM   #7673
DonkoTheClown
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 741
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arouet View Post
No, pokerstove (which is free) just lets you plug in hands and see results. I suggest you download becuase it will help your game to play around with it. You can put in hand ranges to find out your equity for any given hand.

For better analysis without a statistics degree, you'll need a tracking program like pokertracker or HEM, both have free trials. There are free trackers out there that you can find from google.

Obviously for the more advanced analysis you need some expertise in spreadsheets, statistical analysis like Spacebidder and QPW have. They have posted in this thread some basic guidelines on what to look for.
Thanks Arouet! Does Poker Tracker allow you to import data by hand? I might be able to get some of my friends to help me type this stuff in from the data I received from Pstars. Pretty cumbersome, but we could probably knock out a 1000 hands a piece and run that info for a look see. I could probably work on this while I am playing and logging more hands with that program.
DonkoTheClown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:50 PM   #7674
Arouet
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Arouet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,433
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkoTheClown View Post
Thanks Arouet! Does Poker Tracker allow you to import data by hand? I might be able to get some of my friends to help me type this stuff in from the data I received from Pstars. Pretty cumbersome, but we could probably knock out a 1000 hands a piece and run that info for a look see. I could probably work on this while I am playing and logging more hands with that program.
You should be able to import the file the pokersite sent you without any problems.
Arouet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 12:50 PM   #7675
Markusgc
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Markusgc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Noodles, Hockey & Punk Rock!
Posts: 8,788
Re: The great "Poker is rigged debate" - Collected threads edition

Donko, I swear I mean this in the most constructive way possible...

If you spend the time and energy improving your game that it seems you intend to use checking out some figures to determine whether or not the sites are fair, I promise your results will improve. I strongly suggest you try that first.
Markusgc is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008-2020, Two Plus Two Interactive