Quote:
Originally Posted by deuceblocker
I don't know what you are talking about. In a civil case, the plaintiff doesn't have to prove it. The evidence just has to be strongest for the plaintiff. If you are going to respond "I don't remember" or whatever or take the Fifth in a criminal case, you are better off pleading guilty.
So you are on a jury in a civil case and Veronica and so on are convincing and can't be cracked under cross examination, whereas Postle tries to dodge all questions and say nothing. Who would you believe? If you were Stones would you want to settle or have that kind of public spectacle?
If I know poker Veronica.
If I was an average person, I would want some solid proof that gambling can't produce that kind of run.
I mean, someone wins the lottery every now and again.
In order to do that you need to flip heads 25 times in a row, stand on the tallest building in your city and throw a coin off the roof and hit someone in the head YOU KNOW.
Runs like this are possible to the general public.
They continue to play the lottery.