Quote:
Originally Posted by SooperFish24
Cmon shills explain this, or is against the terms of your employment to actually agree with anyone shining Online Poker in a bad light.
Tons of players with straight downward sharkscopes and OPRs exits, they just do not post as often as the bad players who ran hot in a new account once or twice. I wonder why...
Anyway, not sure what the issue is. Since that guy found the pattern to success, he should open a new account every day at different skins for a couple years and then retire from the hundreds of boom switches he receives. Or he can repeat with his girlfriend's info (whether he posts a pic or not).
Not sure why these guys choose not to take advantage of their pattern recognition skills and show us the results a year or two later when they are up six figures. Most just quit out of frustration instead like you Scooper, or some talk about the 50 bucks they made. It really makes no sense. Make millions, not 50 bucks. You have the secret code.
Why don't you get back into it and do what I suggest above? Use the riggedness patterns that you believe at total face value from a new and likely gimmick account. After all, his claims have to be perfect, so get out there, leave that counter job you have and make millions with that secret information you trust.
I am being totally serious. If it is rigged then capitalize on it since you know how it is rigged.
Can you give a reason why you or anyone should not do that, and why have we not heard of some long term verifiable stories (ie: not a random guy saying he made a hundred bucks one day) of this being done.
I know I casino whored hard years ago as did others and we have the results that can be shown from that happy time. Surely a new account boom switch whore can show the same.
This should make you happy, I am not even trying to "debunk" this theory. I am suggesting you and others talk less about it and instead make millions with your information instead of working at the minimum wage jobs you and others seem be in instead. No need to thank me for looking out for you, I am always here to help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by burden2
It's difficult to "prove" things mathematically- not "easy" like you say.
What is difficult for you is easy for others. Most of your beliefs would have been discovered by now by those who have skill to analyze data.
Quote:
Originally Posted by burden2
Saying that some company they are paying audits some software that stars gives them, is by no means any type of proof.
Be very specific - what exactly would you need to see to make you happy. Trick question, since nothing will, but you may as well try to answer. You already imply the company auditing them is in on it since they are paid, so it will be hard for anything to break away from that conspiracy belief structure. Just add more people "in on it."
Quote:
Originally Posted by burden2
You might be surprised how often the conclusions of casual inspection matches up with the results of rigorous statistical analysis. The boards are ragged way more often on pogo.
Flop probabilities is one of the easiest things to prove, even if you cannot imagine a way to do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by burden2
So you are saying stars does not offer higher stakes games? Why would that be? Maybe they don't want the smarter, higher stakes players to recognize patterns in their deal?
Even for you this is a pretty feeble conspiracy belief. I am pretty sure some of the 10-20 table grinders at the low/mid/high stakes they have would noticed these special patterns by now, as would those who have done studies on that as well.
Then again, maybe you have that special vision thing, kind of like a super power. Use it for good, not evil.
All the best.