lol

also i think that bogan was banned for being your standard 4l troll/tard but not 100% sure

what time are we talking about here? If you mean when his Bogan4Life (or something) account got banned, then yes.

Yes. If the higher ups had known that he was posting again at any point in the last 2 years, any of his accounts would have been banned instantly with all the posts deleted.

This is a terrible analogy. Maybe pet snake that you don't think is venomous!

Afaik his he was permad on bogan4life and mods turned a blind eye to him posting on ockerman for a couple months at least.

He was allowed back a while after that on the bogan4life account (I think). Then he posted a thread abusing Mat Sklansky and was IP banned along with all his other accounts.

Sigh.

I like Yarbles / M1ghty, they've always seemed very passionate about the game and the community. But I don't think it's hindsight or results oriented to say that it's wildly irresponsible to allow that fundraiser to go ahead with the knowledge they had at the time. PM'ing a mod to "plant a seed" to request receipt of payment from the charity after the donation drive is far too little, far too late... sorry.

Can some kind soul provide cliffs to the money that isn't the $6k for charity being stolen please?

When Dean (and I) parted company with the Salters last summer, he set up a small staking group with Igor and Rich. He was trusted with the accounting and general day to day dealings with horses, they were basically silent partners who helped with coaching/game selection occasionally. Dean added players to the group without informing his partners, and only reported their figures accurately when they were losing. He took his share of profit splits from winning horses, and either kept quiet or claimed he was "own diming" these guys. I've seen the chat logs and it's clear Dean just manipulated Rich and Igor because they trusted his judgement and were afraid to question him.

When Rich and Igor confronted him, he somehow persuaded them not to go public. He then got a staking deal for himself elsewhere, and used the roll he was sent to play with to fund his own staking interests (and probably some degen hyper sessions). Next he stole the charity money, presumably to play more hypers and win back what he'd lost, but perhaps he was just back on the meth, idk, whatever, anyway when that failed he disappeared and claimed to have split with his fiancee.

During his absence he arranged to join a new staking operation with other friends. I'm not sure what happened with this, but it seems he simply took profit splits from horses and didn't report figures accurately. When one of these new staking partners contacted me, marc and abe, we realised there was a possibility that the charity money was compromised so we posted ITT accordingly.

Since then, he's been happily posting daily about trivial **** despite claiming to be in a state of despair and having no internet access. So *** him.

Seems like a website is in order.

I will pay for it all (or other people can help pay), if someone does the "work". we should be able to get a nice site going for pretty cheap outlining all of this.

I recall him being rather upset when they parted ways. Like he felt it wasn't fair on him. So maybe in his backwards mind he saw it as getting what he was owed.

http://nickraineyisathief.com/#home

something like this would be perfect. also willing to chip in for it if someone will make it.

in for the website also

did anything ever come of this?

‎254.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa [192.168.1.254]
200.76.252.33.ded.telnor.net [200.76.252.33]
200.76.250.1.ded.telnor.net [200.76.250.1]
bb-bcn-piopico-22-tge0-0-0-9.uninet.net.mx [189.

bb-la-grand-5-pos0-0-2-0.uninet.net.mx [201.125.

129.119.97.162.in-addr.arpa [162.97.119.129]
ae4.csr1.ARN3.gblx.net [67.16.163.37]
lag1.ar1.ARN2.gblx.net [67.17.74.42]
ojsc-megafon.ethernet13-1.ar1.arn2.gblx.net [159

254.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa [192.168.1.254]
200.76.252.33.ded.telnor.net [200.76.252.33]
200.76.250.1.ded.telnor.net [200.76.250.1]
bb-bcn-piopico-22-tge0-0-0-9.uninet.net.mx [189.

bb-la-grand-5-pos0-0-2-0.uninet.net.mx [201.125.

129.119.97.162.in-addr.arpa [162.97.119.129]
ae4.csr1.ARN3.gblx.net [67.16.163.37]
lag1.ar1.ARN2.gblx.net [67.17.74.42]
ojsc-megafon.ethernet13-1.ar1.arn2.gblx.net [159

anybody wanna do something constructive for the community instead of bitch and moan about anything that comes up figure out this figure out who figure out where

think a site would be a good idea.

So this new info sort of suggests it was premeditated?

I remember I planned to run the 180 comp 2 weeks before the charity thing, and he just completely piggybacked it stole my idea and ran with it which i didnt mind because he ended up doing all the work.

Maybe his original plan was to steal from this, but someone didnt let him escrow and thats why he did the charity drive on the last day of it?

udp_port_scan 46

udp_rate_limiting 246


Mar 9 16:40:45 FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 16): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 92.242.0.145 Dst ip: 201.170.43.117 Type: Echo Reply Code: 0


Mar 9 16:39:41 FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 16): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 92.242.0.145 Dst ip: 201.170.43.117 Type: Echo Reply Code: 0


Mar 9 16:38:37 FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 16): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 92.242.0.145 Dst ip: 201.170.43.117 Type: Echo Reply Code: 0


Mar 9 16:37:33 FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 1): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 92.242.0.145 Dst ip: 201.170.43.117 Type: Echo Reply Code: 0


Mar 9 13:47:34 FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 1): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 219.158.101.45 Dst ip: 201.170.43.117 Type: Time Exceeded Code: Time to Live exceeded in Transit


Mar 9 13:30:44 IDS scan parser : udp port scan: 93.86.144.45 scanned at least 20 ports at 201.170.43.117. (1 of 1) : 93.86.144.45 201.170.43.117 56 117 UDP 37873->65289


Mar 9 13:20:04 FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 1): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 46.165.220.202 Dst ip: 201.170.43.117 Type: Echo Reply Code: 0


Mar 9 12:31:49 IDS scan parser : udp port scan: 24.57.44.34 scanned at least 20 ports at 201.170.43.117. (1 of 2) : 24.57.44.34 201.170.43.117 56 113 UDP 21426->51703


Mar 9 12:30:39 IDS scan parser : udp port scan: 213.86.108.50 scanned at least 20 ports at 201.170.43.117. (1 of 1) : 213.86.108.50 201.170.43.117 56 52 UDP 29235->52213


Mar 9 12:29:31 IDS scan parser : udp port scan: 201.203.203.88 scanned at least 20 ports at 201.170.43.117. (1 of 1) : 201.203.203.88 201.170.43.117 56 114 UDP 38300->58266


Mar 9 12:23:58 IDS scan parser : udp port scan: 92.251.73.180 scanned at least 20 ports at 201.170.43.117. (1 of 2) : 92.251.73.180 201.170.43.117 56 114 UDP 18760->62482


Mar 9 12:18:28 IDS scan parser : udp port scan: 63.135.26.119 scanned at least 20 ports at 201.170.43.117. (1 of 3) : 63.135.26.119 201.170.43.117 56 111 UDP 31696->55773


Mar 9 12:10:50 FIREWALL icmp check (1 of 1): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 195.226.151.223 Dst ip: 201.170.43.117 Type: Destination Unreachable Code: Host Unreacheable


Mar 9 12:08:54 IDS scan parser : udp port scan: 192.168.1.65 scanned at least 20 ports at 201.171.75.183. (1 of 1) : 192.168.1.65 201.171.75.183 56 128 UDP 63785->53939

Well you could try posting something constructive first. Or at least tell us what this is.

idk, when I heard about him having scammed ~$10k in october I assumed the charity thing was premeditated. But he did speak to the charity, and it was one he had legit ties with, so I'm more inclined to assume he "borrowed" that money now in an attempt to cover other debts/chase losses.

sorry was agitated didnt mean it like that about bitching and moaning just meant that im prettty sure i caused trouble for myself posting in this chat today.


andn othing goood will come from it at all its all ****ed up in every which way bogan could be some mastermind computer genius for all we know controlling multiple online personalities and we would have no clue....

my big mouth always gets me into trouble so i learn to just keep it shut as best as i could so i stay off the radar of spitefull people

You still didn't tell us what all those IPs are and where you got them and what you want us to do with them.

Keeping your mouth shut is what created trouble for yourself in the first place. Not everyone has "20-50k" they can write-off and "pretend it didn't happen". My donation to this fundraiser represented a very sizeable portion of my disposable income at the time, given I was grinding micro-stakes under a backing arrangement. I'm sorry you feel like people are being spiteful, but part of making a mistake is owning up and wearing the heat that comes with that. Owning up does not absolve you from criticism, and it certainly doesn't make the people that criticize moaners or bitches, particularly when the mistake has influenced them directly.

Like I said, I like you Yarbles, and M1ghty, and I don't want beef. I didn't highlight this point to rub it in or out of spite. I highlighted it because I think it's important to learn something from this ****storm. It is not ok to withhold information about someones trustworthiness with large sums of money when they are actively promoting a charity fundraiser, or are still operating in any capacity with other peoples money for that matter.

I think I'm done with this thread. I'll pop in to let everyone know about updates with how the charity puts the funds that made it there to use - Lisa said she'd keep me updated.

CSB

what a ****ing clown