Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

05-29-2017 , 06:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
I'll even offer to go to Nova Scotia and suffer with that bagpipe racket.
I'll even learn French (or whatever language is that they speak in Quebec that they call "French").
05-29-2017 , 06:53 PM
Trump is obviously AIDS to global peace and prosperity but Merkel's comments were also kind of ridiculous imo.

Quote:
"The times in which we could completely depend on others are on the way out. I've experienced that in the last few days," Mrs Merkel told a crowd at an election rally in Munich, southern Germany.

The relationship between Berlin and new French President Emmanuel Macron had to be a priority, Mrs Merkel said, adding: "We Europeans have to take our destiny into our own hands."
For one, why did they feel they deserved to "completely depend on others?" That's such a ludicrous statement to me. What makes them so special? Sure we should all be allies and whatnot but that comment will just reinforce what Trump and anti-globalists have been saying about the balance of our alliance with them.

Yes Europeans DO have to take their destiny into their own hands, as they rightfully ****ing should have to like everyone else.
05-29-2017 , 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
I went to Lethbridge once. It was weird.
I got my undergrad degree there. It is weird. All old people and Mormons.
05-29-2017 , 07:00 PM
I know there was some discussion on gerrymandering previously itt. Ben & Jerrys is doing good work trying to educate ice cream fans on the effects of gerrymandering with this fun little test.

Gerrymandered district or ink-blot test?

http://www.benjerry.com/whats-new/20...r-inkblot-quiz
05-29-2017 , 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
Spoken like a true believer. I hope they dunk on you all day long and it drives you up the wall
I think this is directed at me but I don't know what any of it means.
05-29-2017 , 07:06 PM
How long until Trump opens the door wide enough for Putin to threaten war against the US if the left & media don't shut up about Russia?
05-29-2017 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
For one, why did they feel they deserved to "completely depend on others?" That's such a ludicrous statement to me.
It's not like she's saying Germany should be free to mooch off the US, political alliances are meaningless if you can't count on your allies to actually do what they've promised to do. Germany's allowed the US to set up more than a few bases under the pretext that they'b be used to keep Germany safe, and now President Dip**** is trying to play mob extortionist.
05-29-2017 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul McSwizzle
I think this is directed at me but I don't know what any of it means.
generally people who mock liberals as "insufferable" are stupid trump supporters. hope that helps.
05-29-2017 , 07:14 PM
McSwizzle was mocking oncologists as insufferable as part of the general "doctors are self-absorbed pricks" discussion.
05-29-2017 , 07:15 PM
Singing anthems and handshakes come in 345th and 346th in a list of **** I'm worried about when it comes to Donald ****ing Trump.
05-29-2017 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
mob extortionist
Yeah, pretty certain we're witnessing an entire US GLOBAL REALIGNMENT based on Trump's business interests.

We shouldn't do anything until it's too late though.
05-29-2017 , 07:23 PM
Canada's Conservative party just elected a knuckle dragging ultra social conservative as leader. Our last few conservative leaders have been modestly socially progressive.

I hate the ****ing world right now so much.

The single best law any nation could pass is removing the right to vote to white males over 40, and I am a 43 white male. My demographic is wall to wall ****ing awful humans.
05-29-2017 , 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
generally people who mock liberals as "insufferable" are stupid trump supporters. hope that helps.
lol
05-29-2017 , 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I'm in Alberta!
Like I said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
I went to Lethbridge once. It was weird.
Try Drumheller next time. The badlands baby.
05-29-2017 , 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
Singing anthems and handshakes come in 345th and 346th in a list of **** I'm worried about when it comes to Donald ****ing Trump.
1. Nuclear war 1
2. /democracy
3. Global realignment based on Trump's business interests

Better?
05-29-2017 , 07:28 PM
‘Boom!’ Harris Faulkner kills backchannels to Russia story with one super SMART question. Suck a dick liberals. Get on the Kushy train now love it or leave it snowflakes. This is TRUMPs America now not yours. White is right not left. Suck a nut. Clinton. Deal with it. MAGA

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/05/...uestion-496372
05-29-2017 , 07:29 PM
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...america-238872

People wonder what it is going to take for supporters to turn on Trump. It's just gonna take stuff like this.

Tweeting, Russia, foreign policy, this stuff doesn't effect people. They don't care.

When their area just continues to erode and become more gutted than before, that is what will turn them against him. Or at the very least bring them back to their view of apathy.
05-29-2017 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
It's not like she's saying Germany should be free to mooch off the US, political alliances are meaningless if you can't count on your allies to actually do what they've promised to do. Germany's allowed the US to set up more than a few bases under the pretext that they'b be used to keep Germany safe, and now President Dip**** is trying to play mob extortionist.
In 1945 that was 100% occupation rather than being allowed. Over the years that has changed, but for about 75 years (1870-1945) Germany was trying to take over Western Europe and for the last 70 years not so much. At the moment it looks like Germany is the country most resistant to nationalism and I hope it stays that way. Maybe Trump will serve as a warning/inoculation and we'll all recover.
05-29-2017 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
1. Nuclear war 1
2. /democracy
3. Global realignment based on Trump's business interests

Better?
Obviously the numbers are quite contentious, so I'm not quoting, but for tens or hundreds of millions of people climate change probably breaks the top 3.
05-29-2017 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Canada's Conservative party just elected a knuckle dragging ultra social conservative as leader. Our last few conservative leaders have been modestly socially progressive.

I hate the ****ing world right now so much.

The single best law any nation could pass is removing the right to vote to white males over 40, and I am a 43 white male. My demographic is wall to wall ****ing awful humans.
Pisses me off too, now there's going to be 8 more years of Liberal majorities. I think Scheer at least said he won't push his social conservative agenda, but I could be wrong
05-29-2017 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
‘Boom!’ Harris Faulkner kills backchannels to Russia story with one super SMART question. Suck a dick liberals. Get on the Kushy train now love it or leave it snowflakes. This is TRUMPs America now not yours. White is right not left. Suck a nut. Clinton. Deal with it. MAGA

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/05/...uestion-496372
Is the point they're trying to make that if they didn't already have a back channel established then there couldn't have been collusion? Because that's not even remotely accurate, I mean they could have met in person, could have talked previously. They had that Trump server that once the NYT started asking questions they had to stop using it and therefore needed a new secret backchannel.
05-29-2017 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Obviously the numbers are quite contentious, so I'm not quoting, but for tens or hundreds of millions of people climate change probably breaks the top 3.
Nobody asked you dude. This is Our Houses list. He will be the judge of where climate change falls on OUR list.
05-29-2017 , 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
‘Boom!’ Harris Faulkner kills backchannels to Russia story with one super SMART question. Suck a dick liberals. Get on the Kushy train now love it or leave it snowflakes. This is TRUMPs America now not yours. White is right not left. Suck a nut. Clinton. Deal with it. MAGA

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/05/...uestion-496372
LOL they're going nuts over her brain! She is right though. The rules of collusion say you're only allowed to collude once.
05-29-2017 , 07:57 PM
Climate change? Pffft. I'll change my list after Trump learns to initiate gamma ray bursts.
05-29-2017 , 08:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigt2k4
Is the point they're trying to make that if they didn't already have a back channel established then there couldn't have been collusion? Because that's not even remotely accurate, I mean they could have met in person, could have talked previously. They had that Trump server that once the NYT started asking questions they had to stop using it and therefore needed a new secret backchannel.
Lol no liberal. I love it when the TRUMP card is played and your tiny brains try to figure out how to DEAL WIT IT. I tip my hat to this smart little lady, she is ONE SMART COOKIE and you are nothing. It was a very intelligent question, asked by an incredible intelligent woman, love it! You need to get a grip. There is No Russian collision. Bite a trump nut. You are deep sea fishing out in the middle of the ocean with a canoe and think that you are going to catch a whale and bring it aboard.....lol. Get it? As the article states....Why would Kushner need to establish a back channel if there was already collusion with the Trump administration?????? And I think Kennedy used a back channel to the Kremlin to solve the Cuban Missile Crisis.... Duh.

Actually if you have just a shred of common sense and a little rationale (not clouded with the juice of sour clinton grapes) you can easily destroy this collusion mantra and see it for exactly what it is, a political high stakes take down of Trump! My daddy and the ONE TRUE GOD. Allegations are drummed up first through reports from an unnamed source then the liberal media fills in the gaps with conjecture and innuendo, calling it NEWS. Harris Faulkner knows that, she's one of the "real news people". The real collusion is between the liberal FAKE media and the DNC.

      
m