The last sentence is just blatantly ridiculous.

The right wing sons of bitches had already shot a protestor in Seattle, stabbed a protestor in Berkeley, and now murdered two people in Portland. There will be blood. The government preventing rallies is not good. I'm not anxious to see violence escalate, but it's looking inevitable.

I will tell you that every single one of the people at the "free speech" rally is a horrible ****ing person and I'd be very happy if they crawled back under their rocks.

There is no silencing in what you describe.

You have to be an ******* to support Trump period. Is it a shock that 40% of people are *******s? Well, it's more than that because certainly not every ******* supports Trump.

What's your point? You once had a rattle in your mouth. I assume you don't anymore, but maybe that's too much of an assumption.

Silencing the opposition is the American way? And you're calling me dumb? Discrimination used to be the majority. If it wasn't for free speech, civil rights advances never could've happened!

First of all, 40% of Americans do not and did not support or vote for Trump. It's nowhere near that. You're assuming 100% voter turnout.

Secondly, you don't have to be an *******, you just have to be dumb. I'm okay with saying if you voted for Trump, you're probably not too bright. IMHO you guys continue to miss the lesson that should've been learned with his election. And things are just gonna get worse.

My point is you're in this thread concern trolling like a prat. The civil rights movement was in all ways being suppressed by govt agencies of various sorts. McCarthy tried to round up the opposition. You are an idiot if you don't see how suppression of opinions has always been the American Way. And here you are acting like liberals are the bad guys because some angry white dudes in Portland might not be able to shout hateful things. Maybe that's because you want to shout about Islam like the hateful bigot that you are known to be.

ehhh... he has 40% approval rating after the most disastrous start to a presidency...

he DOES have 40% of the whole population's support...

Good then it's just 20%. Calling them dumb doesn't work. They're dangerous *******s.

The Dems lost because they ran a bad candidate.

Why did Trump win the nomination though? Every Republican who imagines they're something other than a fascist clown like Trump should learn a lesson.

Trump stepping up support for SA and US troops on the ground in Yemen.

http://www.aljazeera.com/video/news/...080752822.html

starving child, not a pleasant sight, but it's time to take the crisis in Yemen seriously and stop making it worse.

Should i explain why fighting fascism with fascism is a problem or is it apparent?

I guess you could try. I'm not confident you know what fascism is though.

Lol ya, duh.

You're trying to hoodoo the hoodoo man up in here.

http://articles.latimes.com/1986-06-...1_ku-klux-klan

This has been done already.

She was mainly talking about NATO and the Paris climate change agreement and to a lesser extent trade. Both of which Trump has hinted he is reneging on. To depend on someone in this context simple means that their word isn't worthless. That they will do what they agree to do. Trump is a liar, a cheat and an idiot and her interactions with him have strongly suggested that the US is no longer a friend of Europe.

Liberals and people on the left for the most part have been turning the other cheek to the rights violence/killings and the messed up part is if the right does finally push the other sides to the levels of violence they use people like Lestat will give the same line and blame game.

This is a Trumpism FWIW. Some people say something about him that he doesn't like, so he instructs the DOJ and FBI to investigate or arrest those people without just cause and cries victim to any pushback. Rinse and repeat for other 10x counterpunching.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/30/po...ion/index.html


Russian government officials discussed having potentially "derogatory" information about then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and some of his top aides in conversations intercepted by US intelligence during the 2016 election, according to two former intelligence officials and a congressional source.


One source described the information as financial in nature and said the discussion centered on whether the Russians had leverage over Trump's inner circle. The source said the intercepted communications suggested to US intelligence that Russians believed "they had the ability to influence the administration through the derogatory information."

What do they mean by derogatory?

He got pissed on by prostitutes.

and money stuff

His bank account wasn't the most bigly, and something about mellow yellow.

lol at deplorables caring about any of his derogatories

They don't need to care if it's a crime or basis for a cover-up.

If your tax returns are inconsistent with all your claims, maybe don't run for president.

I bet he was bummed when he found out about the emoulments clause, but not bummed enough to adhear to it.