FYP

This is offensive to women who have no fear of anything.

Lol at you correlating a guy weighing 135 lb and getting laid.

Yeah I'm sure the following guys in this link can't get laid either.

http://www.tapology.com/rankings/cur...ers-135-pounds

Not sure if serious -- which is a situation I find myself in way too often on here.

I'm not enforcing anything, just stating my opinions. This is an internet forum, right? Feel free to block me. That's what that feature is for.

I take this seriously because it's a serious thread and I consider gender inequality a serious issue. I realize it's all a big joke to people like you, but it's actually not.

Thanks brah.

research gun violence in nyc and chicago where legally obtaining/possessing a gun is an act of god.

Obviously I meant plenty of guys weighing 135 lb his age and older than him get laid. So the notion that Elliot didn't get laid because he weighed 135 lb is just plain fail.

It is a serious issue I agree. But it's mind numbing to me how you don't think your efforts to silence others will prove futile. It's sad I guess, but people don't want to hear it.

I don't want to block you, I find your online persona fascinating and enjoy conjuring up mental images of the daily rages against society you must face.

So you were serious.

Haha I'm actually a very chill person IRL. And I get that it's largely futile, but I think little things like arguing over these topics can contribute to change in open minded individuals over time. I've had my mind changed in similar ways. I just get worked up about stuff like this because this forum is full of dudes who don't give a damn about sexism and it always feels like me vs. all.

Yeah I support that.

So how many pounds does a guy have to weigh to get laid for free.

@Cannabusto

I think hearing about it 24/7 gets people vexed. You're right, but it's still as annoying as it would be if someone were to bring up politics at a party.

There's like a 250:1 ratio of "Everyone wants to have sex with me, GOD" : "Genital mutilation still happens." Dude was isolated not because feminism, but because he was a crazy, frustrated narcissist. Girls didn't like him and boys didn't like him. That crazy eventually manifested in killing a half dozen people because it's the only way he could think of to feel visible to others.

"I see you walking with those jerks, why didn't you give a chance to me? I'm a magnificent guy, I'm beautiful -- there's no denying that. I have so much to talk about; I'm civilized, sophisticated, I have style... Girls don't see it. (Sigh) And it's not fair: every single day I have to be insulted by these lesser men enjoying girls..."
(Etc.)


It's common with other big news events, people stampeding past actual bled-out-in-the-street victims whose burials will need to be arranged to feel like political victims in a super-safe way -- nothing like having their clitoris amputated, don't be gross, that's terrible and someone should do something. I GOT CATCALLED TODAY #YESSALLWOMEN. It's ruined all political discourse and doesn't even really apply to the Elliot Rodgers situation, like that hashtag has been around for what, a day, and Washington Post already has an article out about how it's a movement and people are twittering that yeah, they got **** done today, check my latest blog post.

This tangent's a keeper!

You do realize PR is a woman right?

It's never free.

II

To elaborate a bit, I look at that guy and I look at how people have decided that a man being murdered with a machete over a suspected candle theft (?!?!) is a good time for an airing of grievances about rape culture and the pay gap and I think I'm looking at the same self-obsession/obliviousness to the realness of others being expressed in different ways where both have given horribly, ridiculously inappropriate responses to something because neither understands or can deal with the fact that not everything is about you.

And when they get a firm thumbs-down from people it's got to be because we're afraid of the power of their voice or something. Like it can't possibly be that they're really doing a wrong and stupid thing because they're magnificent, they're beautiful -- there's no denying that.

i'm glad that you support that. Just explain to me how it has had any diminishing effect on the gun crime rates in those respective cities.

basically the ban has stopped legal possession of weapons but hasn't deterred the thugs and criminals from getting their hands on them and unleashing hell.

if you want to get a real eye opening figure- take a specific look at shooting stats for chicago over the last 3 years- then try to figure out why the mass media gives THAT level of violence 0 concern-- as opposed to the 24/7 circle jerk over this whacky loser.

I feel I only advocate for it when it's relevant to the topic or I observe a sexist post. It's definitely not 24/7. If you can point out inappropriate times that I bring it up, I'd definitely consider your point.

I get what you're saying here. But that doesn't make it the right time/place to rail against it.

I certainly don't nor do I realize how that would be obvious. I also don't see how it has anything to do with my point.

Haha I know I'm recently divorced.