Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011]

05-03-2010 , 10:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
...I'm taking my nasty ass out of here...
Josem changes his avatar more often than McSeafield changes his underwear.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-03-2010 , 11:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
I answered:
Quote:
After all you must get any benefit in kind and anybody will get once upon a time his come-uppance exactly in accordance what he earns.
The original wording in German was:
Quote:
Irgendeinen benefit in kind musst du ja schließlich bekommen und jeder bekommt irgendwann einmal genau das Fett ab, das er verdient.
It is much harder for me to translate this into English than u might believe. DUCY?
the funny thing about this is neither the german nor the english version make any sense
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 12:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
1) Please don't mix my qoutes arround if u have no clue what I said.
LOL at this coming from you. Really big LOL, after you quoted me and changed the quote without mentioning it, and then requoted me later on without attribution in a way that made no sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
2)
I was cited in the first post. This means I said it already before the thread started.
You are absolutely correct; not sure how I missed that. My apologies.

See how that works? You should try it some time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
3)
Your thinking is flawed. If u can't understand my opinon, then read the last pages ITT again.
Please explain how my thinking that the output is most important is flawed. Keep in my mind that my comment about output had nothing to do with that other thread.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by humanoid
Al hypothetical , realdeal is never going to launch.
RealDealPoker.com is Launching May 7, 2010.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 12:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealDealFDR
RealDealPoker.com is Launching May 7, 2010.
Spamtastic!! Thanks for that detrimental piece of info. When will you be able to tell us how your system works?
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
I said it already between the lines. A hidden code or radio frequence with a certain noise level could be enough to become a winning player and know then all hole cards.
The Russians use 4625 kHz (AM full carrier). Watch out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monteroy
I think it was a Lizard Person
Not quite, but close:
Spoiler:
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 01:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
I know u are a very bright boy here in this forum. I learnt a lot from u during these AP/UP cases and I appreciate your opinon. However, I thought u also learnt a lot, i.a. that u had much luck during the AP case.
I don't really know what you mean by this. I don't think there was much luck involved at all - various players had their suspicions, they provided data, I converted that data into a pretty picture, and that was that. I didn't do any particularly "smart" analysis, I didn't do anything special: I just translated from numbers into pictures.

Subsequently, the hand history sent to Crazy Marco became public, but even that wasn't much in the way of 'luck' - that's how Absolute Poker had distributed their tournament hand histories in the past.

Even if uncovering that situation was all luck, that really doesn't have anything to do with what I thought was a fairly self-evident technique of ensuring that whatever site you play on is legitimate.

Those points are, again:

1) A comprehensive explanation of how the deck is shuffled (ie, detailing the process)

2) Accessibility to the hand histories (ie, the outcome)

3) Credible auditing

4) Credible regulation

Those four attributes are how you determine whether the shuffling on any online poker site is legitimate. That's simply how you do it. I really don't think that the four factors are particularly onerous or controversial, and I'm not sure anyone would disagree with these four factors - I assume you agree with me on this point (if you do disagree, tell me what you would change).

Quote:
And therefore I say u what. The value of this document is below zero for me. It says what is says - not more.
Sure, and that's fine. You're entirely welcome to say that the world's leading software gaming auditor isn't valuable to you. I guess that's a bit weird, but if that's your view, then so be it.

Of course, I really just think that you're being deliberately obtuse about audits, because you previously said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
This pokersite will be the first one who is examinable and transparent at any time. Any poker hand can be the subject to an fast independent and cheap audit. What the hell do you want more?
Well, I say back to you, McSeafield: "Any poker site can be the subject to an fast independent and cheap audit. What the hell do you want more?"


I think it's really weird that people promoting certain online poker sites come into these discussions, make false and sweeping statements based upon ignorance, and then blindly assert an alternative as being the solution to the problem - without either identifying the problem, or explaining why the solution addresses the problem.

Literally everyone who has ever analysed the Intel or ID Quantique random number generators has confirmed that they're legitimate. AFAIK, no rigtard has ever claimed that the underlying RNG devices are biased in anyway - it would not even make any sense to argue that there are more 1s or more 0s coming out of the devices. The rigtards have claimed that for whatever reason, the RNGs get ignored or overruled in certain hands to favour particular players. I obviously disagree with that view, but that's certainly a fair statement of their views.

If rigtards have such a belief, then changing the underlying random number generator from a quantum-based device into a mechanical device doesn't even relate to the problem that the rigtards claim to be concerned about. The whole discussion is based on the faulty thinking that changing what generates the random data addresses their concerns. It doesn't.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 02:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealDealFDR
RealDealPoker.com is Launching May 7, 2010.
You're posting in here under an SN that includes your site name, something that is generally reserved for approved advertisers. And now you skip a bunch of legitimate questions and respond to a post that allows you to spam your site and tell us when you open. You're probably not going to last long at this rate.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 02:25 AM
Good, if he's not going to answer Real questions, how will he get me a Real Deal? Honestly Gene, all of this is terribly old and it's now to the point where I am starting to hope you fail. Go look at some Real poker sites threads. Where there is a real representative answering Real questions with Real answers. Your thread blows and you have sent in shill type idiots that make your product look comical. But wait, you spent a lot of money and 5 years!!! How is it? Pissing into the wind?
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 02:28 AM
Quote:
As a player with long roulette experience and a certain degree in statistics and propability math I know permanences and also some techniques of permanence multiplications.

I wish to learn about McSea's degree in statistics. And I absolutely HAVE to get more details about his long roulette experience and whatever studies he has done on this game.

Did he elaborate on this roulette stuff previously in the thread? I've only read the last 60 posts or so. Has he done studies of the game and roulette "patterns" and so forth? If so, then that would be awesome and I would like to learn every single detail about this.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 02:30 AM
McSea - I had a friend named Jerry who was a roulette dealer for many years who was also really good at some fun math. You could give him two numbers of 4 digits and he could multiply them in his head and give you the answer in like two seconds. It was really awesome.

Anyway, in all his time dealing roulette he had noticed several patterns about the game. One of those which I remember was that the ball landing in 12 or 21 was very frequently closely followed by the ball landing in 21 or 12 (the inverse). Sure enough, while he was telling me about this the ball had landed in a 21 and then on the next spin it landed just one or two numbers off from the 12. Really close call. I found it to be terrifically exciting. Have you made a similar observation about these particular numbers? Please explain. I wish to learn more. My friend Jerry wasn't able to give me any more info about why this was.

(note to everyone - the above is a true story...my friend's name really was Jerry and he really could do the multiplying thing in his head like that)
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 03:53 AM
Usually i just ignore McSeafield and i guess most people in german 2+2 do the same. But because he is kind of new to you guys, I'm jumping in, to clear some of the confusion.


Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
... Presumably I'm in the wrong forum, or? ...
Yes, you never even played (online) poker, if that statement from you is correct.


Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
Shall I speak in the future in my first language only? I wish u something better. ...
No, please dont speak only in your 1st language, because your german posts are longer and even worse than your english posts.



Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
I'm taking my nasty ass out of here... That should make u and a few people happy.
Wont happen, but you guys have noticed that as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
But if you're more comfortable debating it there, I can understand. Your English is many, many times better than my German. I'm hoping that's what our miscommunication in this thread has been caused by.
No, you are so wrong Bobo. Reading him in his native language and speaking the same native language doesnt help in any way. One of the problems is that he ignores arguments, which often leads to the impression and expression that he is living in his in own world.

Last edited by CBukowski; 05-04-2010 at 03:56 AM. Reason: formatting
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 04:20 AM
I just opened for u a new G2+2 BBV Thread

whistle-blower CBukowski in action

Explanation: McSeafield has many haters.

Most of them are affiliates or people from German affiliate forums which differentiate between so-called contributing and cannibalistic affiliates.

to be better understood where this comes from:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...0&postcount=39

Last edited by McSeafield; 05-04-2010 at 04:29 AM.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 04:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSeafield
I just opened for u a new G2+2 BBV Thread

whistle-blower CBukowski in action

Explanation: McSeafield has many haters.

Most of them are affiliates or people from German affiliate forums which differentiate between so-called contributing and cannibalistic affiliates.

This only shows your way of constructing the world.


Most people dont like you. And because you hate affiliates, everybody must be an affiliate. Yeah makes perfectly sense.

Grow up, son. And have a nice life.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 04:43 AM
Go back into your forum and don't confuse the 2+2 community.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 04:48 AM
McSeafield,

Could you please share your views on what an online poker site should do to generate trust in its shuffling?
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 05:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
McSeafield,

Could you please share your views on
biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig mistake.



cbukowski is right.
mcseafield wont listen to anybody except his name is david sklansky.
he is always right without any chance of persuasion.
he derails every thread with his offtopic bs.
he is like the most hated person in german 2p2, and not only affiliates hate him, almost everybody does.
even the people who dont hate him are annoyed by some of his posts.

he lives in his own world and all of you are better off just ignoring him.



mark my words

Last edited by xjimraketex; 05-04-2010 at 05:30 AM. Reason: his english (and german as well) tilts me
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 05:34 AM
Time for a merge, no?
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 05:36 AM
@Josem

u get an answer. But please understand that in your case and with alll these blowflies here in this thread I need a little longer.

Last edited by McSeafield; 05-04-2010 at 05:49 AM.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 07:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xjimraketex
he is like the most hated person in german 2p2, and not only affiliates hate him, almost everybody does.
haters gonna hate

Last edited by RobbStarr; 05-04-2010 at 07:51 AM. Reason: cosign ur post though
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 10:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealDealFDR
*edited for blatant advertisement*
Sir could you please answer the questions about your poker sites card generation. I'll even condense it to one simple question.

Is every hand dealt on RealDeal poker taken straight from one of your patented shuffling machines and dealt to the table without any reordering of the cards besides the cut?
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
I don't really know what you mean by this.
I am sure you know what I mean. I read almost all AP-Threads and have studied almost all your posts from the beginning. At this point of time I had only 6 month poker experience as a hobby poker player. Very little background. And what do you think was my impression? I have seen what trouble you had, the big number of guys who doubted cheating, the lying pokersite, the gaming commission which was considered as a joke and also the fortunate coincidences which helped you. This was your luck – it was not only your skill and intelligence to handle these situations and the big solidarity behind you in this forum. And without the help of very good guys in this forum you had never succeeded. I still remember when you opened an own website to find additional supporters and make noise in this world. It was necessary to apply such pressure.

You got your money back. And what happened then? The wrongdoer are still in action somewhere and play poker perhaps with the same software but a little bit more careful. Can't u see that?

You chanced the pokersite and stopped noisemaking. Do you think this helped to get poker in the USA or Europe legalized without solid house cleaning? You see it also in this thread. The blowflies are almost everywhere and their arguments are very weak – in fact they have no argument at all and no vision how to look into the future. But almost all have their economic interests in play, mostly affiliates who behave like parasites in this poker market. I have never seen similar parasites as a live gambler. They want to earn money in this greymarket without any risk, the players shall carry the whole risk (which is much higher than losing only during the game. I don’t enumerate all these risks because I know what would happen then).

Since that time I am a fighter for clean and fair circumstances in poker. Can't you understand why. Yes or No? You might me consider as a conspiracy theorist or rigtard. But be carefully. and read exactly what I have already written here in this thread and also in this forum or on G2+2. There is much more background which I have not yet indicated and I won’t normally do it here in this forums. All this is hard work. Here in this thread again. I have more opponents or haters than supporters. That's right.

But think also why. And if you know the reason than you might also understand why I sometimes act like an icecold hardliner. I know my opponents better than they know me.

I stop to argue here. And I know also why.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
Even if uncovering that situation was all luck, that really doesn't have anything to do with what I thought was a fairly self-evident technique of ensuring that whatever site you play on is legitimate.
Do u really know what legitimate mean? I know there are different meanings for this word and u know I have some language problems. I ask you more specific. Do u know what lawful or constitutional mean? I am sure there are many differences between Australia, USA, Europe or Germany too if you try to understand the meaning. But from a German consideration almost all or most pokersites are unlawful. Btw: The IoM is not part of the EC. Don’t forget that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
Those points are, again:

1) A comprehensive explanation of how the deck is shuffled (ie, detailing the process)
2) Accessibility to the hand histories (ie, the outcome)
3) Credible auditing
4) Credible regulation
All these points might be considered as legitimate. Yes. But as far as 3) and 4) is concerned you get a big problem with me. Use better the phrase “Creditworthy from a player’s perspective”. I am sure I have a complete other consideration what creditworthy means than u. I say this not as a poker player. Perhaps as a very experienced gambler or also as a business guy who has already analyzed tons of audit reports as an international manager and business consultant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
Those four attributes are how you determine whether the shuffling on any online poker site is legitimate. That's simply how you do it. I really don't think that the four factors are particularly onerous or controversial, and I'm not sure anyone would disagree with these four factors - I assume you agree with me on this point (if you do disagree, tell me what you would change).
I disagree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
Quote:
And therefore I say u what. The value of this document is below zero for me. It says what is says - not more.
Sure, and that's fine. You're entirely welcome to say that the world's leading software gaming auditor isn't valuable to you. I guess that's a bit weird, but if that's your view, then so be it.

Of course, I really just think that you're being deliberately obtuse about audits, because you previously said:
I will never say that this gaming auditor isn’t valuable to me. I respect this company very much. I said: This document says what is says. Almost nothing. What has been audited? Under which conditions? Where? When? For what time? Who has given the order for this audit? What was the order? Which audit standards are applicable? What is the norm? Who has accepted or prescribed the standards? The audit company or the pokersite itself? To whom is this company responsible? Is there a responsibility at all? Who pays for damage? Is there any legal effect for the player? Or is this document only a confirmation for the pokersite that this device produces under certain circumstances true random? Read this document again and again. Btw: This document has been recently renewed and it will be in a view month already be very old.

I am not obtuse about audits. I am in fact worked also as an auditor and I think like a very experienced auditor. And not as an self-professed genius. I acted as a certified public accountant and carried the whole risk for any mistake or wrong wording in my audit reports or testates. I wrote tons of caveats and know what any single word in a phrase of a caveat could mean.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
Well, I say back to you, McSeafield: "Any poker site can be the subject to an fast independent and cheap audit. What the hell do you want more?"
It can be done. Gene knows that as a CPA and I have enough imagination to know it too. The idea is imo brilliant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
I think it's really weird that people promoting certain online poker sites come into these discussions, make false and sweeping statements based upon ignorance, and then blindly assert an alternative as being the solution to the problem - without either identifying the problem, or explaining why the solution addresses the problem.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
Literally everyone who has ever analysed the Intel or ID Quantique random number generators has confirmed that they're legitimate. AFAIK, no rigtard has ever claimed that the underlying RNG devices are biased in anyway - it would not even make any sense to argue that there are more 1s or more 0s coming out of the devices. The rigtards have claimed that for whatever reason, the RNGs get ignored or overruled in certain hands to favour particular players. I obviously disagree with that view, but that's certainly a fair statement of their views.
I have never seen a RNG device somewhere in a blackbox. Only in front of a computer as a hobby poker player. The only thing I know is that it is very hard business to confirm true random. The example above says it all. In any case it will always be difficult with or without special testing software. And how can u be sure that a pokersite always uses the same RNG device and whether such a device can’t be manipulated? I have no idea. I have never seen a pokerroom RNG device. Sofar I have no experience at all. That’s right.

I read something about PokerRNG. Perhaps someone has a professional editon which works on certain sites or with special RNG devices. No idea. I have never speculated or tested such stuff and will never do it.

.

Last edited by McSeafield; 05-04-2010 at 10:52 AM.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 11:03 AM
RDP is not listed as an IoM license holder.

http://www.gov.im/gambling/licensees/
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 11:16 AM
But its the real deal they dont need no stinking licensess.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote
05-04-2010 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xjimraketex
biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig mistake.



cbukowski is right.
mcseafield wont listen to anybody except his name is david sklansky.
he is always right without any chance of persuasion.
he derails every thread with his offtopic bs.
he is like the most hated person in german 2p2, and not only affiliates hate him, almost everybody does.
even the people who dont hate him are annoyed by some of his posts.

he lives in his own world and all of you are better off just ignoring him.



mark my words

Excatly this
You just cant argue with him. Its pointless. No matter what you say, he will not stop spamming.
Real Deal Poker - We'll Be Right Back After These Extensive Renovations [2011] Quote

      
m