That would certainly seem to be the case.

It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

I still find it kinda funny.

To be perfectly honest, so do I.

you guys need to give your head a shake bashing this site before its even up and running .

this is mostly due to you tho, and i still see that Nfuego has his thing shoved so far up your ...well you know that he follows you everywhere you go. btw i could really careless about this new site its just a new marketing ploy.

RDP is still not listed as an IoM license holder.

http://www.gov.im/gambling/licensees/

The next Gambling Supervision Commission meetings will be held on:-

Thursday, 6th May

(today imo)

Man, you are looking for a perma ban?

Just cause your thread got moved to its appropriate pace, doesn't mean you get random insult privileges.

Not at all.

If someone tells you they are going to do something and that something does not make any sense you don't need to wait for them to do it before you can point out the error in their logic.

Yes, of course.

I am the one who told them to do something in a way that defeats the whole object of what it sets out to do.

Of course you could care less.

If you did you wouldn't have bothered posting on this thread.

Err hello realdeal its the 7th of may why have you not launched ? LOL so funny this ridiculous site aint never going to launch ha ha ha !

'm not saying "the games" are not fair there just not ideal, right. An RNG is not real poker, fact....

Where have i said poker is rigged? i'm just saying anything that can make online poker closer to the real thing is progress, right. If RDP manages to do this, which isn't 100% certain if at all, then progress will have been made.

Thats definitely, not what i mean. There are still questions that need to be answered by RDP but apparently because of pending patents the CEO is unable to talk about them..........

Where did I say you did?

I was just pointing out that on just one aspect of fairness a 'great' debate has been ranging for well over a year without getting anywhere.

Online poker is real.

So if you slowed the online game down the rate that b&m poker is played and banned multitabling that would be progress?

I don't think many people would agree with you.

Only if you believe that doing something completely pointless equates to progress.

A lot of people don't.

still not launched yet?

fyp
here we go again. Some poster comes itt and starts racking up a post count all in the name of "Real Deal". They may have a real deal, but dam how many fake/shill accounts can one company have?

*steps aside so as not to get hit with the Hammer when it drops*

you still didn't answer my question about NFuego20 thing being shoved so far up your ass that he follows you everywhere you go.

You said: "and i still see that Nfuego has his thing shoved so far up your ...well you know that he follows you everywhere you go".

That isn't a question, it's a statement.

The difference is something that is normally taught to five year olds.

How did you miss learning that? Is your statement on topic for this thread?

l

you are paranoid,give up the weed. Not once have i big up'd RDP.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

lol at the home page now.
Maybe they decided to change the website name to "almostrealdealpoker"

Launch time must be true 'cos they included the time zone.

It's real in that people play poker based on what they perceive to be their own cards, community cards and bets made.

It's real in that you can win and lose money playing it.

Not at all. You said: "i'm just saying anything that can make online poker closer to the real thing is progress, right".

Slower play and only playing one table at a time are both fundamental aspects of live poker. So if you make online poker slower, for example, that's closer to what you refer to as 'the real thing', and thus, according to you, that's progress. Your words.

Anyone who can see that to get deals fast enough for any reasonably popular poker site, unless you can fill an aircraft hanger with dealing machines, you need to generate numbers to either simulate a deal or pick an ordering of a mechanical deal, will, logically, agree that an RNG is necessary.

ROFLMAO.

So you are saying that because Kepler was correct anyone who proposes anything in the name of progress must also be correct?

WRONG!

No but you seem to have an entirely irrational belief that it is in some way 'progress' when, in fact, it's nothing of the kind; merely a marketing ploy designed to sucker in paranoid rigtards.

Let's see, you joined six months ago and made a couple of posts, then you decide to start posting again this week and double your 6 month post count. All in the real deal thread. All telling everyone how it's going to be the "Promise Land" of online poker. Paranoid? May be. Give up the weed......thats about as likely as this site/concept lasting for more than 3 years if it starts at all.

Breathlessly waiting for 7 pm GMT' -