@spadebidder

I think Robert C. Hannum Professor of Statistics at the University of Denver was the inventor of this ingenious DeckMatrix System.

http://mysite.du.edu/~rhannum/

I didn't know this old 2+2 thread (which were closed) and have to correct something:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...0&postcount=21
Denver man hopes online poker system will score

Nobody is challenging the fact that his machine creates a random deal. What is your point?

Nobody is not correct. I am sure you have no doubts about the randomness. But I found also this somewhere:

Where in the world do you get the idea that this:

"This is just an easy way to promote a new poker site (-> link to various affiliated poker sites). What BS."

says anything about Real Deal not having a random deal, lol.

It might make your point a little better if your quote actually showed someone doubting the machine creates a random deal.

lol

It says clearly that Real Deal Poker is BS and I say that "What BS" is a nice self-assessment. Since I (normally) don't place links to affiliate forums in my posts I can't make my point a little better.

and the words "not random" are where, exactly?

I don't like to read 112 + 31 + xx - (perhaps 13) = 130 + xx pages of hater stuff. I'm currently satisfied with the following:

Seems like a lot of spam itt today. Or at least smoke and mirrors. I thought they were opening in mid April. Is it open for real money? Or are we waiting on Patent attorneys to give the OK?

That's good, because so is everybody else. Nobody is saying their deal isn't random, lol.

Fair enough. So why respond to this:

wth this:

followed by you quoting someone who said nothing about randomness?

In the future, you could just save us all some time by posting something like "Some people don't think it's random, but I don't like to read 112 + 31 + xx - (perhaps 13) = 130 + xx pages of hater stuff to find a quote. Instead I'll just quote this guy to show you what haters there are."

Gene, the answer should be obvious even to you. The WSOP is a live tourney event

My concerns over your site do not really centre around your dealing matrix. You have spent 5 years developing a system that was not needed. All we want is a fair random deal and RNG's give this. Although there are a number of rigtards that we all know about even these still play online because deep down they know it's random anyway. They are just looking for excuses to explain their poor play and results.

My concern with you and your site has been the way you have used shills in various guises to try and promote it. StephenMeares was the worst of these but you have used many more names. If these names were you then you should be ashamed of yourself and if they were your partners/employees you should still feel ashamed.

I don't appreciate such underhand tactics and for that reason alone would never trust your site to do the right thing.

because he spoke only about BS.

Thanks, I will do that.

I'd appreciate it in the future if you'd make some indication that you were changing my quote.

I'm still wondering why these idiots are running the Everleaf software. If they're going to go on and on about innovation, then maybe they should develop EVERYTHING on their own and be...you know, independent? And are the other skins switching over to this machine deal or whatever it is?

I would guess that more than 50% of all posters in this forum think something else, not only the rigtards.

Sounds for me as follows: “I am afraid to loose some fish - my best friends - and fear still other consequences. Furthermore, I am not interested that any poker hand is certified by gambling regulators. I also have no clue what state regulators might want in the future.”

Welcome in the world of rigtards. It takes all sorts to make a better world.

you have completely lost touch with reality, then

don't care about any of this

another mighty Everleaf skin

over/under on number of real money players on Real Deal one year from now is tiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnyyyyy, imo

Think about what u say. 50% - ~37,5% ~= 12,5% - x% cheaters - x% people who have no opinion at all.

you do realize that poll is a joke, right?

look at some of the people who answered yes, lol

Don't need 2+2 polls to unterstand reality. I know already what selection and survivorship bias mean and have a pretty straightforward idea how many winning players exist. The only percentages I don't know is the proportion of the cheaters and shills among the so-called winning players and the proportion of affiliates among all 2+2 posters.

I doubt you do, as most people believe the myths. Tell me what you think and I'll tell you the real statistic for online poker.

yeah, it's all a giant affiliate-driven conspiracy because they all fear the MASSIVE IMPACT that Real Deal Poker is going to have on their bottom line, lol

WTF is up with this McSea guy? All of a sudden it's like he is RealDealFDR. Watching this whole Deal is frustrating. And it's getting to the point of pissing me off, to where I think Real Deal is back to full of sh*t. Answer the questions or just STFO.