Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Does Whining About Political Correctness in a Racism Debate Correlate to Being a Racist? Does Whining About Political Correctness in a Racism Debate Correlate to Being a Racist?

09-28-2014 , 06:56 PM
Actually every single one of you is racist. Because skin color shouldn't even be discussed as a category.
09-28-2014 , 06:58 PM
Mat- "By the way, I've never done that joke again, ever, and I probably never will. 'Cos some people that were racist thought they had license to say ******. So, I'm done with that routine." Chris Rock, on that bit you just linked.
09-28-2014 , 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Actually every single one of you is racist. Because skin color shouldn't even be discussed as a category.
Ah yes, the Real Racists are the people who talk about racism. This is a brand new and groundbreaking take that will revolutionize the discussion.
09-28-2014 , 07:01 PM
Even if affirmative action meant that less skilled applicants were getting into med school, how does that ever have any bearing on your doctor's skill?
09-28-2014 , 07:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Mat- "By the way, I've never done that joke again, ever, and I probably never will. 'Cos some people that were racist thought they had license to say ******. So, I'm done with that routine." Chris Rock, on that bit you just linked.

interesting. i would be curious to know what he saw/heard exactly that drew him to that conclusion.

it's actually funny to me. if a racist thinks that chris rock has given him permission to be racist and call people ******s, that's pretty ironic, i think.

but he still gets a pass, right? even if he decides the effect wasn't as intended, nobody blames him.
09-28-2014 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Actually every single one of you is racist. Because skin color shouldn't even be discussed as a category.
"Ignore the KKK or you are racist."
09-28-2014 , 07:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
So anyway, to get back to the titular question, yes, obviously. Look at this ****stick.
Oh, nvm. Thought you wrote something else. Please do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDuker
That reminds me of an old joke I just made up. Racist goes to a clinic. Black doctor comes into the exam room and says "I heard you were asking for me?" Patient looks terrified. "I said I needed a BACK pain doctor!!"
very good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTheMick2
"Ignore the KKK or you are racist."
Mat obv just spitballing today, seems everyone gets it.
09-28-2014 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Actually every single one of you is racist. Because skin color shouldn't even be discussed as a category.
Human-centricity. Skin color is no more significant than the color of eyes.

There is a just cause to use racial demographics to identify areas of systemic racism. That is a narrow reason to maintain the category for the time being.
Besides that,and to neutrally describe a person's appearance, I totally agree with last sentence of your post.
It is difficult because people do individually maintain a racial identify of themselves. This is not patently mistaken as a person can see themselves as black or white, but still see other people as equal regardless of race.
09-28-2014 , 07:24 PM
i'm finding myself more and more agreeing with the hypersensitive wookie/trolly/fly team.

my entire conscious life i've been disturbed by the fact that so many racial minorities are living in poverty and seem to be the primary occupants of housing projects. if language contributes to this inequity, i'm okay making some small changes to my vocabulary.
09-28-2014 , 07:26 PM
Mat,

You are not a racist idiot (in my estimation). Sorry.
09-28-2014 , 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Mat,

You are not a racist idiot (in my estimation). Sorry.
hold on a minute. i also think thomas sowell makes a lot of sense:

http://townhall.com/columnists/thoma...1805/page/full
09-28-2014 , 07:29 PM
well nobodies perfect.
09-28-2014 , 07:32 PM
About that article, I don't think that many people deny that a welfare trap exists just that the "solution" from the american right (ie cut benefits so people can tough it out) is self serving hypocritical racially charged nonsense that detracts from society in a significant manner.
09-28-2014 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
i'm finding myself more and more agreeing with the hypersensitive wookie/trolly/fly team.
Please consider joining the sensible PC crowd wing rather than the make stupid accusations wing.

The later may seem more satisfying and even produce some good results but its foundations are rotten.

Quote:
my entire conscious life i've been disturbed by the fact that so many racial minorities are living in poverty and seem to be the primary occupants of housing projects. if language contributes to this inequity, i'm okay making some small changes to my vocabulary.
Language can allow us to live with it complacently. Don't do that either.
09-28-2014 , 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Please consider joining the sensible PC crowd wing rather than the make stupid accusations wing.

The later may seem more satisfying and even produce some good results but its foundations are rotten.


Language can allow us to live with it complacently. Don't do that either.
i agree with you there.
09-28-2014 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
do comedians get a pass?

i really find racial humor funny. all of it. non-whites making fun of whites and whites making fun of non-whites. down the line. i think it brings us all closer together.
You should try this:
09-28-2014 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
hold on a minute. i also think thomas sowell makes a lot of sense:

http://townhall.com/columnists/thoma...1805/page/full
From the article

Quote:
If increasing your income by $10,000 would cause you to lose $15,000 in government benefits, would you do it?
Is a good point but the left can tackle it. The alternative isn't to remove welfare but to make sure that earning money always makes you better off.

The left in the UK aim to do that. couldn't tell you the figures off-hand but its hardly some impossible task for the left.

Most other problems can be tackled as well without becoming remotely right wing.
09-28-2014 , 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
Even if affirmative action meant that less skilled applicants were getting into med school, how does that ever have any bearing on your doctor's skill?
It should have a bearing on your confidence of his skill. But then so should the opposite effect mentioned by BTM.
09-28-2014 , 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweep single
You should try this:
that was lol funny to me. all of it. the jokes a little, but mostly the guy getting hit in the face.
09-28-2014 , 07:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
It should have a bearing on your confidence of his skill. But then so should the opposite effect mentioned by BTM.
He is a doctor, though, not a med student. He had what it took to graduate med school and pass the boards, regardless of whether or not affirmative action helped him get into med school. What am I missing?
09-28-2014 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
From the article


Is a good point but the left can tackle it. The alternative isn't to remove welfare but to make sure that earning money always makes you better off.

The left in the UK aim to do that. couldn't tell you the figures off-hand but its hardly some impossible task for the left.

Most other problems can be tackled as well without becoming remotely right wing.
As a round man would say "but they haven't tried everything else yet."
09-28-2014 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
well pobodies nerfect.
fyp

Gawd, do you even Simpsons?
09-28-2014 , 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
i agree with you there.
here's a suggestion for the forum rules that allows good moderation and free speech as per now. Its a rough draft

Posters are expected to take extra care not to be offensive to socially disadvantaged or discriminated against groups unless they openly admit to a prejudice against such groups. Extreme cases prohibited as like now.

Mods will behave much as now but the rules for them and everyone dealing with errant posts and posters are to attack them for not conforming with the above rather than to attack the poster
09-28-2014 , 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTheMick2
As a round man would say "but they haven't tried everything else yet."
Not getting the reference.

i'm not advocating left wing btw just pointing out the weakness of the right's rhetoric.

Obviously liberal is best.
09-28-2014 , 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
here's a suggestion for the forum rules that allows good moderation and free speech as per now. Its a rough draft

Posters are expected to take extra care not to be offensive to socially disadvantaged or discriminated against groups unless they openly admit to a prejudice against such groups. Extreme cases prohibited as like now.

Mods will behave much as now but the rules for them and everyone dealing with errant posts and posters are to attack them for not conforming with the above rather than to attack the poster
you quoted me, but i have no interest in discussing or making rules.

      
m