Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here

07-02-2012 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
Let's be clear: I'm a significant dog to A8ss.
No youre not. Youre ahead. Its just easy for him to catch up.
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
No youre not. Youre ahead. Its just easy for him to catch up.
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

990 games 0.000 secs 198,000 games/sec

Board: Ts 7s 9c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.040% 38.59% 00.45% 382 4.50 { QdQh }
Hand 1: 60.960% 60.51% 00.45% 599 4.50 { As8s }
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willi
This does not matter what hand he shows here.
especially since gad basically told us the results ages ago lol
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by derwipok
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

990 games 0.000 secs 198,000 games/sec

Board: Ts 7s 9c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.040% 38.59% 00.45% 382 4.50 { QdQh }
Hand 1: 60.960% 60.51% 00.45% 599 4.50 { As8s }
Meh

That really sucks for hero then
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
I didn't say he was erratic; I said he was snug. It was my impression that he knew enough about poker not to be flatting UTG+1 super-duper-wide, but suited connectors are pretty and I wouldn't be surprised to see him show up with them after flatting pre (not taking into account the raise, obv), especially if he felt that by flatting he could bring some other people along.

Like, I didn't get the impression he was dumb at all. I just don't give him credit for thinking super, super deeply about stuff. There's a wide range of people in-between that.

But we can put some combos of KTo/QTo/JTo into his range pre if you want. I don't think he's really raising them on this flop, even if they do give him top pair. I gave him more credit than that at the time, especially if he tends towards the cautious side of things.

at only 40bbs deep is it that incorrect for him to raise if he does have a hand like QTo here? i would guess that flatting is better, but it doesn't seem terrible to raise top pair on a draw heavy flop when you are 40bbs deep.
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by soah
especially since gad basically told us the results ages ago lol
what do you think he had?
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:42 PM
Every time I PkrCrunch a reasonable range for him we're getting our ass kicked. . .

EDIT: Simple assumptions based on him not being terrible at poker: He is not raising air on that board. He is aware Gad may be protecting against a (very) wet board. He is aware that Gad is not auto-cbetting that (very) wet board. Therefore he is not raising AT "for info" or making any similar terrible decision.

Based on that I do not believe there is an available range of hands for villain that allow us to ever be significantly ahead. May as well call it "slightly ahead / WB."
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by filthyvermin
at only 40bbs deep is it that incorrect for him to raise if he does have a hand like QTo here? i would guess that flatting is better, but it doesn't seem terrible to raise top pair on a draw heavy flop when you are 40bbs deep.
depends on how he ranges me with my UTG open (to whatever extent he does, even if it's just "Gad probably has pairs or big cards here") and what he hopes to accomplish by raising the flop
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Every time I PkrCrunch a reasonable range for him we're getting our ass kicked. . .
yup
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
what do you think he had?
based on what you said about the results, some draw with 50%+ equity against you
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:44 PM
Poker is such a bull**** game

In how many games on earth can you actually have the technically advantageous position and still be losing mathematically?
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:45 PM
Also Gad you have left out info about other players.
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:45 PM
annie,

you still around? why is this a ship in an online tourney, but a fold here?
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by soah
based on what you said about the results, some draw with 50%+ equity against you
I'll give him 98ss.
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Poker is such a bull**** game

In how many games on earth can you actually have the technically advantageous position and still be losing mathematically?
I'm not sure in what sense it's a technically advantageous position.
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
I'm not sure in what sense it's a technically advantageous position.
Because we have a pair and the opponent has ace high
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Poker is such a bull**** game

In how many games on earth can you actually have the technically advantageous position and still be losing mathematically?
a lot of them?
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Because we have a pair and the opponent has ace high
Isn't that kind of like saying an army is in a technically strong position because it has more men, except for it leaves out the part where there is an intelligence report that the enemy's attack aircraft are very likely to momentarily arrive?
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Poker is such a bull**** game

In how many games on earth can you actually have the technically advantageous position and still be losing mathematically?
Haha

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willi
Also Gad you have left out info about other players.
Yeah, true. Fairly standard, no significant short stacks, nobody who'd been 3betting crazily, nobody who'd been ridiculously passive. UTG+1 could reasonably have expected to get between 0 and 2 more calls after his flat of my open. (Which should obv take stuff like JJ+/AK out of his range here, but I don't think it did.)

I can give results in a bit.
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:51 PM
gosu

the game is all about putting yourself as far behind as possible
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Isn't that kind of like saying an army is in a technically strong position because it has more men, except for it leaves out the part where there is an intelligence report that the enemy's attack aircraft are very likely to momentarily arrive?
Yeah I guess so

I guess I was wrong about it then. If the equity is really THAT bad then I guess a fold is the best play

Im still right on my read though, I know that
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Im still right on my read though, I know that
you need to stop being so stubborn.

this is absurd
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:57 PM
Results:

I tank, go through the options, basically do the analysis that Hoya did, and fold.

He then makes a face to indicate that I made a good fold, and flips up the one plausible hand I had significant equity against.

I am positive he thought he was raising for value there.

And I take comfort in the fact that I analyzed everything correctly (in my opinion) and that if I'd called or shipped, he would have hit a gutshot or backdoor spades or something by the river. Reverse results-oriented thinking ftw!
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:58 PM
so Systo was sort of right in that his range for doing this was wider than hands that kick my ass

but wrong that the guy would be making a play. I folded in part because I got the sense that he felt he he was betting for value. And I was right, but he was doing it with the only worst hand that he shows up with there.
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote
07-02-2012 , 02:59 PM
.
Post Crazy Poker Happenings to Share with Poggers here Quote

      
m