**** 30k hands in a day + profit on 200nl 6m prop bet*** [See confessions of cheating. MH] - Page 108

Two Plus Two Forums Poker News & Discussion Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance

**** 30k hands in a day + profit on 200nl 6m prop bet*** [See confessions of cheating. MH]

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 108 of 163

First

8 58 88 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 118 128 158

Last

Page 108 of 163

First

8 58 88 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 118 128 158

Last

03-30-2010 , 02:20 PM

#2676

Jesus Lester

enthusiast

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 77

Quote:

Originally Posted by jalexand42

Yo dude, let's be clear here, I haven't released _ANY_ personal details about anyone. In fact, I spent time REMOVING his picture from screenshots BEFORE I was ever demanded to.

It's okay, it just can't be a steel108 post unless he talks about how tough he is (because all the black kids picked on him), or how little he cares about bonus money or paying a bunch of money for coaching because he plays 400nl and money isn't anything to him because unlike all the other (different) kids raised in his neighborhood he was able to make a success of himself, as represented by how much money he has. BALLA!!!

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:20 PM

#2677

ajt8

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 2,860

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thappers

Gary and RoSeeker used a trick to hide the decline

is this the collusion of the non nl200 players dumping $1400? or is this something else, this is where i am lost

detailed cliffs please!!!!!!

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:21 PM

#2678

junwagh

adept

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 792

pls comment about what you are hiding in the chat logs and why you think Gary may have cheated pls

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:25 PM

#2679

waow

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 2,755

Quote:

Originally Posted by junwagh

pls comment about what you are hiding in the chat logs and why you think Gary may have cheated pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoSeeker

I can't use chatlogs anymore, they wouldn't mean anything, and I went back and checked and it turns out I've only got one part where he said something about multi-accounting FB and I was spazzing out because Jalex found it. Whatever, they shouldn't mean anything in the first place.

"guys don't worry about the chat logs, I checked them myself there's nothing suspicious! they don't mean anything! take my word for it."

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:26 PM

#2680

Cusipz

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 3,408

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajt8

mother of god, CLIFFS

+1111111, will ship $1 on stars to the someone who posts *comprehensive* cliffs.

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:30 PM

#2681

BoC34

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 1,469

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cusipz

+1111111, will ship $1 on stars to the someone who posts *comprehensive* cliffs.

not worth $1 to take all that time to come up with cliffs. why don't you just search cliffs in the thread and you'll find one that might be halfway decent haha

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:34 PM

#2682

Cusipz

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 3,408

because there has been a lot posted since the last ******ed cliffs-effort. this ****in thread doesn't go away.

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:43 PM

#2683

ajt8

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 2,860

why roseeker even said he had chat logs (assuming he didn't want to give them away...) is really beyond me.. that is incomprehensibly stupid

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:43 PM

#2684

d0nk3y

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 3,185

Jalex said there will be detailed cliffs soon, I think he's waiting on stars response.

If you can't wait read this post

Quote

03-30-2010 , 02:47 PM

#2685

ajt8

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 2,860

Quote:

Originally Posted by d0nk3y

Jalex said there will be detailed cliffs soon, I think he's waiting on stars response.

If you can't wait read this post

thanks, this is like the eclipse of scum

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:16 PM

#2686

hooheehaa

banned

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 270

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoSeeker

Ads are deceptive all the time, and it's arguable whether it's right or wrong. Legally it's right, morally they make some people think certain food products are healthy when they are not and some people think that's wrong, while other think it's people's fault for being stupid.

It's okay to be deceptive in a game, in a sport tactics wise, and in poker.

So yeah. I am just admitting that what I have been doing is wrong and I am not saying it isn't, but also please recognize there are different levels and kinds of fault, and certainly cheating students teaching people things I know I can't teach is not one of them.

Yes, I do think some lies are minor. The world is not black and white. Some of you think that small lies means no trustworthiness at all, but I think everyone lies or hides the truth, or does not say what they think all the time. Clearly my credibility should be brought under question, but people are putting it out of context and making it worse than it is and also blaming me for things where I haven't actually done wrong at times in this chaos.

I have emailed stars again and I would like to stay away from the drama for now. I feel that I have exposed myself adequately, and everyone has raised their questions and I have defended myself. Whether you accept my defence is out of my hands.

roseeker the way you lie is really obvious and horrible, and you do it over and over again. that definitely makes you very untrustworthy. you should work on fixing that part of your personality

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:27 PM

#2687

2slick

old hand

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 1,592

yeah, work on being a better liar

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:28 PM

#2688

GigaFish

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,234

Quote:

Originally Posted by d0nk3y

Jalex said there will be detailed cliffs soon, I think he's waiting on stars response.

If you can't wait read this post

Wow. I've been popping in and out of this thread for a little while but didn't realise until reading this that things were that f*cking blatant.

Are the police getting involved yet? If GaryNeville (who's got to be a c*nt anyway for having that sn) is UK-based as I think he is, then presumably he will be getting worried right now as it seems like this activity might well contravene the Gambling Act 2005 (NB: I'm not a lawyer but have just been discussing this with a barrister mate of mine).

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:30 PM

#2689

BitchiBee

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 24,622

Quote:

Now as to the matter of lying. You want to be very careful about lying; otherwise you are nearly sure to get caught. Once caught, you can never again be in the eyes to the good and the pure, what you were before. Many a young person has injured himself permanently through a single clumsy and ill finished lie, the result of carelessness born of incomplete training. Some authorities hold that the young out not to lie at all. That of course, is putting it rather stronger than necessary; still while I cannot go quite so far as that, I do maintain , and I believe I am right, that the young ought to be temperate in the use of this great art until practice and experience shall give them that confidence, elegance, and precision which alone can make the accomplishment graceful and profitable. Patience, diligence, painstaking attention to detail—these are requirements; these in time, will make the student perfect; upon these only, may he rely as the sure foundation for future eminence. Think what tedious years of study, thought, practice, experience, went to the equipment of that peerless old master who was able to impose upon the whole world the lofty and sounding maxim that “Truth is mighty and will prevail”—the most majestic compound fracture of fact which any of woman born has yet achieved. For the history of our race, and each individual’s experience, are sewn thick with evidences that a truth is not hard to kill, and that a lie well told is immortal.

sound advice ldo

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:31 PM

#2690

MinSixBet

grinder

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 639

Roseeker, why did you even admit to having chat logs lol? Wouldn't it have been smarter to just delete them? Either work on being a better liar, or stop lying.

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:31 PM

#2691

Barewire

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 9,724

Quote:

Originally Posted by GigaFish

he's not uk-based

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:33 PM

#2692

bleurain

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 391

tried to read through several pages.. there seems to be some drama with this prop bet what is going on? can someone give cliff notes on what happened

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:36 PM

#2693

da_fume

veteran

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 3,035

Quote:

Originally Posted by bleurain

tried to read through several pages.. there seems to be some drama with this prop bet what is going on? can someone give cliff notes on what happened

Yeah it's tough being incompetent, huh?

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:38 PM

#2694

foal

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 3,599

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cusipz

+1111111, will ship $1 on stars to the someone who posts *comprehensive* cliffs.

I'll do it for a hand job.

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:39 PM

#2695

GigaFish

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,234

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barewire

he's not uk-based

Ah well. Might be worth checking out the legislation of wherever he is based; seems like this is on the verge of obtaining monies via deception which is presumably illegal in most jurisdictions and certainly is within the EU.

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:42 PM

#2696

BitchiBee

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 24,622

Quote:

Originally Posted by GigaFish

wat

if it can be proved in a court of law that he obtained money through fraud (presumabilly you are talking about criminal courts here with an extremely burden of proof) then ldo hes not getting any money

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:46 PM

#2697

GigaFish

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,234

Quote:

Originally Posted by BitchiBee

I am assuming he's not getting any money anyway. Although we're still waiting on the final decision on that, I reckon the odds on the findings going against him are significantly shorter than those he was offering at the beginning of this fiasco.

No, I'm talking about the fact that con artists should face the full force of the law as well as finding themselves cut out of the gains they were looking to secure via their scammery.

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:49 PM

#2698

michty6

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,041

Very entertaining thread. Great work by jalexand42 throughout and it's only a matter of time before the actual matter comes to a conclusion I guess. The side matter of Roseeker's self destruction continues to keep the masses entertained in the mean time...

If anyone was bored I think it'd be pretty funny to just post a reply where you quote (multi quote) every post Roseeker/Nostalgica made in this thread as it's be cool to see the chain of nonsense unfolding in one post...

Quote

03-30-2010 , 03:52 PM

#2699

Slap My Jack

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 3,160

Quote:

Originally Posted by jalexand42

I don't think it's possible for someone to edit a received e-mail within GMail,

It's quite easy to forge and send an email. Usually spam filters should pick it up. Email isn't really a secure form of communication.

Quote

03-30-2010 , 04:02 PM

#2700

rafdogg2000

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 6,178

haven't read entire thread, but am i getting this rihgt??? RoSeeker voluntarily entered this thread?? and if he hadnt, there would likely be no connection between him and OP/dumpers found? genius.

Quote

Page 108 of 163

First

8 58 88 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 118 128 158

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 108 of 163

First

8 58 88 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 118 128 158

Last