http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=1567
#knew
actually part of what i wrote was not entirely correct;
the ico launchers, even if not american, will be charged with selling unlicensed securities to americans
0 product
0 business plan
0 corporate structure
0 software
0 function
= fraud
the people who allow trading of unlicensed securities (bittrex probably #1 target rn,) will be accused of not possessing proper licensing to sell such securities.
if during discovery it is found that the actual sites themselves bought ICOs and were market makers themselves, god help them because they are ****ed on top of ****ed.
there's a reason why polo hasnt listed an ico for trading in months.
they know whats coming.
sec just went fishing for a small fry, and he's going to be rekt because this is just a case where they are sharpening their tools for the bigtime showdown vs iconomi or bcap imo. the fact that this guy was dealing bitcoin and not eth is even worse. they will use whatever knowledge they gain from this case and try to apply it to the big fish, god help these ico launchers that the SEC walks away thinking/believing that they cant build a strong enough case against some of these 30m+ raises.
Last edited by aggo; 07-02-2017 at 03:37 AM.