The "LOLCANADA" thread...again - Page 298 - Politics and Society -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics and Society

The "LOLCANADA" thread...again

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 298 of 579

First

98 198 248 278 288 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 308 318 348 398 498

Last

Page 298 of 579

First

98 198 248 278 288 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 308 318 348 398 498

Last

04-20-2023 , 12:16 PM

#7426

uke_master

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 17,443

Quote:

Originally Posted by lozen

Washington Post breaks story that Justin Trudeau said Canada will never meet the 2% goal for NATO

This is presumably just the truth. While the situation has improved since the Harper years, Canada is still nowhere close. Before Ukraine, I would have said it was appropriate. Now I'm not so sure.

Quote

04-21-2023 , 02:03 AM

#7427

MoViN.tArGeT

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 6,800

Exclusive: Justin Trudeau has told NATO officials privately that Canada will never meet NATO's defense spending target, according to a leaked document. Canada’s “widespread” military deficiencies are harming ties with allies, the document says

well ya no **** lolz

Quote

04-21-2023 , 03:18 AM

#7428

Montrealcorp

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 17,213

Seem Twitter has back off for cbc .

Quote

04-21-2023 , 11:54 AM

#7429

MoViN.tArGeT

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 6,800

theres pretty much zero point for canada to have military. they are doing it right keeping a fringe military so if things change and they need one it would not be as difficult I wouldn't mind more cutbacks tbh let the us spend 100 trillion a year or w/e for us

Quote

04-21-2023 , 01:17 PM

#7430

uke_master

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 17,443

That was previously more or less my view. But Ukraine changed it. I think NATO countries still need to have a non-trivial amount of military capacity so that they are able to act as that dissincentive against agression by Russia etc knowing that NATO will fully support Ukraine. Canadian military released a great image of our leopards loading onto cargo planes the other day.

Quote

04-21-2023 , 01:36 PM

#7431

MoViN.tArGeT

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 6,800

im the opposite I see russia fail measurably and ask myself why would I want my tax dollars going to that instead of healthcare we have no enemys capable of defeating us currently. ship are few overpriced tanks and vehicles off to Ukraine and be done with it they probably cost billions to maintain. my relative whos incharge of media for the Canadian army would probably beat my ass for saying that lol.

Also no matter what canada spends its gonna be 1/1000th of the united states whats the point. They seem to enjoy wasting

Quote

04-21-2023 , 01:38 PM

#7432

uke_master

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 17,443

That's a bit circular though. Russia failing measurably was contingent on massive amounts of western military aid. As incompetent as the russian military been, were it not for that aid the war would be over long back.

Quote

04-21-2023 , 01:49 PM

#7433

Montrealcorp

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 17,213

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoViN.tArGeT

The problem with healthcare is put up more money in it do not give medical care anyway .
It’s workers we are missing and money won’t change much of that .
Doctors are already well payed .
Nurses complain more about force overtime and bad schedule .
More money is not always the answer .

i agree with uke last 2 post

Quote

04-21-2023 , 02:26 PM

#7434

MoViN.tArGeT

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 6,800

ya thats true but money in theory makes more workers

Quote

04-21-2023 , 02:35 PM

#7435

Montrealcorp

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 17,213

Fwiw I’m all for giving more money to healthcare but I strongly believe the money won’t end up in creating more workers sadly .
It might help on the nurse side to increase it a bit but seem the money just get lost in the ever ending growing management .

Worst is , many doctors frown for working 50-60+ hours a week now (the old guard are retiring ) .
New doctors rather work 40 hours per week with better family life (new generation) .

Quote

04-21-2023 , 08:56 PM

#7436

lozen

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 26,832

So 13.2 billion $$$ for a battery plant for VW

Good investment?

Quote

04-21-2023 , 11:51 PM

#7437

wreckem713

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2019 Posts: 1,684

Has the Canadian gov really introduced a type of forced speech as it relates to the use of preferred pronouns? Can you get a ticket or something for not obeying this? I have seen this in some headlines but don't know if I am understanding it correctly.

Quote

04-22-2023 , 12:56 AM

#7438

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 57,426

Quote:

Originally Posted by wreckem713

Sounds like you're reading some pretty shitty sources, unless the headlines were from April 1.

Quote

04-22-2023 , 08:46 AM

#7439

wreckem713

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2019 Posts: 1,684

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobo Fett

Sounds like you're reading some pretty shitty sources, unless the headlines were from April 1.

https://www.them.us/story/canadian-c...ghts-violation

Quote

04-22-2023 , 09:08 AM

#7440

lozen

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 26,832

Quote:

Originally Posted by wreckem713

Bill C16

https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/featur...c-16-explained

Quote

04-22-2023 , 10:29 AM

#7441

wreckem713

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2019 Posts: 1,684

Quote:

Originally Posted by lozen

Bill C16

https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/featur...c-16-explained

Interesting. Looks like there is some truth to it despite the unnecessary and rude response from Bobo. How do the Canadians ITT feel about this type of law?

Quote

04-22-2023 , 11:48 AM

#7442

lozen

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 26,832

Quote:

Originally Posted by wreckem713

Interesting. Looks like there is some truth to it despite the unnecessary and rude response from Bobo. How do the Canadians ITT feel about this type of law?

I would guess most CDN's couldn't care as it really does not impact their lives. If you asked the average CDN what bill 21 covers most would say no clue.

Quote

04-22-2023 , 03:48 PM

#7443

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 57,426

Quote:

Originally Posted by wreckem713

Interesting. Looks like there is some truth to it despite the unnecessary and rude response from Bobo.

You asked the question, so I'm not sure why responding to it was "unnecessary". I guess you could say I was "rude" to your sources by calling them shitty, but I stand by the fact that any headline that summarized it in the way you posted was shitty. Just to start, the law says nothing about pronouns. Literally, nothing.

There's always "some truth" to these things, which the source then takes and twists to their predetermined narrative.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wreckem713

How do the Canadians ITT feel about this type of law?

Quote:

Bill C-16 added the words “gender identity or expression” to three places.

First: It was added to the Canadian Human Rights Act, joining a list of identifiable groups that are protected from discrimination. These groups include age, race, sex, religion and disability, among others.

Second: It was added to a section of the Criminal Code that targets hate speech — defined as advocating genocide and the public incitement of hatred — where it joins other identifiable groups.

Third: It was added to a section of the Criminal Code dealing with sentencing for hate crimes. If there’s evidence that an offence is motivated by bias, prejudice or hate, it can be taken into account by the courts during sentencing.

Seems pretty common sense to me.

Quote

04-22-2023 , 09:06 PM

#7444

lozen

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 26,832

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobo Fett

There was the note that

Quote:

The bill, which enshrines the rights of transgender or gender-diverse Canadians by including them under human rights and hate-crime laws, has sparked some debate. Critics voiced concerns that the law will penalize citizens who do not use specific pronouns when referring to gender diverse people.

It seems like a stretch that the government would try that

Quote

04-22-2023 , 11:53 PM

#7445

uke_master

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 17,443

Well looks like Musk abandonded the whole labelling the CBC/BBC etc bit. Given how politicians like Poilievre exploited this label to falsely imply it was connected to the CBC being "Trudeau propaganda" the label clearly wasn't working.

Let's just notch one more in the endless list of Poilievre fabrications.

Quote

04-22-2023 , 11:57 PM

#7446

uke_master

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 17,443

Quote:

Originally Posted by wreckem713

Interesting. Looks like there is some truth to it despite the unnecessary and rude response from Bobo. How do the Canadians ITT feel about this type of law?

Quote:

Originally Posted by lozen

I would guess most CDN's couldn't care as it really does not impact their lives. If you asked the average CDN what bill 21 covers most would say no clue.

The bill is overwhelmingly supported by 84% Canadians at the time (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...ghts-1.3750829).

Most Canadians actually DO care about what happens to other people around them and don't just think about what impacts their lives. However, a certain type of conservative thinks as lozen suggests. They are probably in that 14%.

Quote

04-23-2023 , 03:10 AM

#7447

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 57,426

Quote:

Originally Posted by lozen

There was the note that

Yes, sadly Canada also has a few politicians and pundits that embrace the whole culture war thing that has gotten so popular in the US, and will try to make a much bigger deal of this than it actually is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lozen

It seems like a stretch that the government would try that

Right.

But, I fully expect that at some point we'll get some jackass who constantly harasses a coworker including some intentional misgendering, then gets fined or charged with something, and we'll have those same politicians and pundits all up in arms about how the "woke" have cancelled someone over pronouns blah blah blah.

Quote

04-23-2023 , 09:24 AM

#7448

lozen

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 26,832

Quote:

Originally Posted by uke_master

When I say most CDNs don't care I am referring to gender pronouns of course most CDNs want to protect everyones rights

Let's not start out the 7 the Trans Gender thread in the Canada thread. I support the bill as long as it does not force individuals to use pronouns

Last edited by lozen; 04-23-2023 at 09:37 AM.

Quote

04-26-2023 , 12:34 PM

#7449

lozen

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 26,832

Ok correct me if I am wrong . I saw this on Fox News that Justin Trudeau says he never forced folks to get the vaccine . This was in an interview posted to twitter

https://www.foxnews.com/media/justin...get-vaccinated

Now he never tied folks down and injected them but denying someone a job is forcing them.

Quote

04-26-2023 , 02:37 PM

#7450

Monteroy

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 16,729

Hard to really know given the extreme biased "reporting" that person does. What I like is even in his bio they are pretty blatant, almost proud of it, and if you look at his history

https://www.foxnews.com/person/h/gabriel-hays

You will see that they are basically biased opinion pieces, not actual news.

Now I get that he is telling you something you want to hear, but the source is pretty meh (being generous) as per usual. I realize you will say the source (and his history of extreme biased opinion pieces) does not matter, but of course it does.

All the best.

Quote

Page 298 of 579

First

98 198 248 278 288 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 308 318 348 398 498

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 298 of 579

First

98 198 248 278 288 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 308 318 348 398 498

Last