how so ?
where u got statement ?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...hows#xj4y7vzkg
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-s...nge-and-health


that was interesting too, maybe u will lay off on the AC problem ?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/clima...rature-deaths/

[QUOTE]"Both heat and cold can kill. But cold is far more deadly. For every death linked to heat, nine are tied to cold."

See you make a joke of it

Just be honest you want oil exploration to end in Canada and everyone to drive an electric car and electric trucks. Your 100% into the Green revolution and for you it doesn't matter if the cost is oil workers jobs, 100 new coal plants in China to manufacturer this demand for solar panels and green energy. YOu have no issue with battery plants being approved with no environmental impact being done or the 15,000 slave labors that mine the minerals to make these batteries

You may want to educate yourself on were all these minerals come from



If Vice is to radical than google 50 another stories on the plight of these workers. Just say it you don't care you have your lifetime job at a University

If only those slave laborers were trans than maybe you would care

It always amazes me that conservatives - who undoubtably would oppose the government lifting a single ****ing finger to help any of these problems - just presume that I'm totally ok with slave labors (sic) and coal plants in China (or people dying of alcohol in shifty's inane case?). No, buddy, we can work on multiple problems simultaneously. It's not like your party is going to start implementing ethical sourcing regulations or give two shits about it in any context other than green energy, but hey if you can somehow smash that into some talking point as a critique of me, well, buddy, good ****ing luck with that.

lol lozen .
Like oil is only about electric car .
U know oil as a lot of other uses then transportation right ?
So the concept of anyone thinking stopping oil in Canada and put everyone out of jobs is a real big joke by u ….


The right is against minimum wages , union , pension plans , redistribution of wealth UBI or higher tax to help the poor .
The concept u care about for foreign workers and their working condition is laughable too ….

My stand is pump as much oil as you can and add Energy East Pipeline.
Im for minimum wage and Alberta has a $15 minimum wage. Two Conservative governments have not touched it
Im for Unions
Im for pension plans but not for tax payers to pay government employees pension plans. Let them save like the rest of us . I have no issue with a matching benefit plan ,

Actually I do care about slave workers . Its clear Uke is willing to sacrifice them for green energy. At least I know all the CDN workers in our energy sector make a good living and are protected from unsafe working conditions

Wow good on you CBC

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canad...fba538a1&ei=35

So why u complain about JT policy about oil when is super friendly for years with them while u want even more oil being pump and yet complain about trudeau policies about climate changes ?
U make no sense .

Let's keep in mind the original question was what lozen's plan was for accomplishing what he claimed was a moral responsibility for Canada to limit emissions. How he got from there to here is quite remarkable.

Happy Canada Day

The best way to do that is have cheap, plentiful, reliable energy. Not make arbitrarily more expense.

No, most Canadians don't view themselves as alcoholic's or it being an issue. Would you support a huge tax on alcohol to stop people from consuming it and change their behavior by market forces?

And to you!

Ok, then you probably should stop with the inept “lolol you support carbon tax but not alcohol contradiction ahahahaha” bit. It’s embarrassing. And yes, I think taxes in alcohol should be pretty steep compared to other goods, they already are much higher and I’d see an argument for higher still. But I think prevention and treatment programs are generally better bang for the buck in this area. Regardless, nothing to do with climate change. Obviously.

One of the funny things about Poilievre is that because he has adopted Trump style lying about everything, the lying happens for the most mundane and the most significant. Normally I talk about his big lies like when he implies the carbon tax is a cash grab deceptively ignoring that 90% of the federal revenue being rebated back. But today we go for the least significant story!

In multiple tweets, Poilievre has harped on the transport minister contributing to a CBC story about footwear from the MPs
Hilariously, he didn't read far enough down the article to realize that his own deputy leader is ALSO showing off her kicks for the same piece. I mean it is hilarious he is taking umbrage at a light-hearted fashion story at all, but doing it so hypocritically is just ridiculous.

Another doozy. My god the guy is slippery. https://twitter.com/pierrepoilievre/...96Ytk2nEU_KokQ

If you read any article about this (he inappropriately doesn’t link to things like the cbc or Toronto star only makes unclickable graphics when he wants to comment on their stories), the “90” year mortgage is referring to people on fixed payment variable mortgages where if you compute what the amortization would be at renewal if you kept the payment low but the interest rates high then it would give 90 years in the most extreme cases of people who got 30 year variable mortgages at the absolute minimum. As these people were all stress tested to do when they took out the original mortgage.

But nobody is allowed to do that. The payment has to rise back to 30 year. Saying Canadians “must now take out” a 90 year mortgage is completely deceptive of what is going on. It also has little to do with Trudeau as he falsely attributes since BoC independently raises rates and it does so for an inflation problem occurring in every 1st world country where if anything Canada is second best in the g7.

At some point lozen is going to clue in the guy is a Trump-style serial liar.

Why would he care about that revelation?

Ya, Pollivere should spend more time tweeting lame ass cringe worthy tweets to Taylor swift.

Lol, ya been pretty funny watching conservatives getting mad that Trudeau was trying to tap into canadian angst over being shafted by swift. Especially funny when they don't realize that "Cruel Summer" is a reference to one of her songs - but don't worry the swifties he is catering to all get it. Of course no mention of the conservative MP who tried to file an "official grievance" over the same issue.

Interesting Opinion Article on the EV subsidies on the battery plants

Warning Warning Warning this is an opinion article

10 reasons why we should be concerned with battery subsidies

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/tops...473b982d&ei=11

Hey, congrats on indicating that was an opinion piece and not news, because if you had placed it as a news article I would have mentioned that that person's Twitter (with very few followers) is all about being against alternative energy sources for the most part, so a bit of bias as always. Shifty should follow him, though guessing Twitter already suggested it to him.

He did post about a new legislation of a requirement of 13 and under being mandated to wear life jackets in boats. Not quite sure if he was for or against it, but if he is for it then I am in agreement with him on that topic!

Some scary numbers on what you need to make to buy a home in BC and Ontario . Its funny how both leaders pledge to make housing affordable but sadly can't tell you how


https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/fina...01fca3fc&ei=34

I do believe I had discussed this earlier. We do not have enough power for the Climate Revolution

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canad...fda0cb74&ei=28

AS well a great Opinion Piece on Canada's defence

Monteroy Warning Warning Warning Opinion piece

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canad...ca4b5953&ei=38

In first link it’s funny alberta says it will be too costly to changes from coal and gaz to heat home etc to a better renewable energy while much poorer provinces actually did it .

For the nato financing and the need to expand military investment I would have no problem to get money from the oil subsidies and put it in the military to satisfied lozen .
Isn’t strange oil corporations still gets massives subsidies while making records profits ?

NO Alberta is saying they can do it but not till 2050 Lets say they announce to build a nuclear power plant It could take 15 years before its even built with all the red tape they would have to go through

You should be happy Justin and his Green Jesus are on doing all they can to end fossil fuel production while giving 20-30 billion to battery plants that may be obsolete once built


As for Nato the column bashed Harper worse than Trudeau. I personally think any country that does not fulfill its commitment should be booted right out of Nato

Great Job Justin im sure the carbon tax had nothing to do with these increases. Its not like you need to diesel to farm or transport food

And this is just June. How do families do it???

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/tops...480cd957&ei=52

Meat: +6.9 per cent (+6.3 per cent)

Dairy products: +7.4 per cent (+7.5 per cent)

Cheese: +5.0 per cent (+6.0 per cent)

Eggs: +8.9 per cent (+8.2 per cent)

Fresh milk: +6.5 per cent (+6.6 per cent)

Bakery products: +12.9 per cent (+15.0 per cent)

Kinda hilarious that today's pretty damned excellent inflation numbers gets recast by lozen as some sort of anti-carbon tax nonsense. Contrary to your suggestion, prices were one of the declining factors that brought this inflation report back to the 1-3% range. Of course the effect of the carbon tax is not nothing (keeping in mind most families get more in rebates than they directly pay in carbon tax), but the carbon tax just isn't the primary driver of why food inflation is higher than inflation in the rest of the economy.