Shills and Trolls:

And the Beat Goes On.

The joke will be on you shills its just a matter of time

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

i like this thread

If this behaviour is so obvious, and yet you can't prove it, it doesn't really speak highly of your skills at evaluating the fairness of sites.

Damn Felt , what happened to the big hair?

Thought it was time for a change. I've been posting a bit in the NHL thread in SE and figured a sweet Pavel Bure gif was in order.

Fair enough. Didn't recognize you. But I thought it would be some Canada kills the US goal in the Olympics, lol.

I just knew it...

Last I checked 37% of 2 + 2 believe that the games are rigged, and that number is undoubtedly far greater outside this forum.
What exactly is your definition of tiny?

The real answer is tiny with regard to their $$$ as a proportion to the market. Riggies mean nothing as they are nearly all tiny stakes players and most still play even as they whine and whine and whine.

You quoting a stat based on I assume a weird poll in the rigged thread is sort of LOLbad as a means of any kind of proof. Next time measure the average height of the entire population by starting with NBA players and doing your first report after finishing all the teams.

Others can have fun with your question and make comments on what else is considered tiny.


All the best.

That poll is invalid because it's rigged.

Last I checked you were a troll who thinks a single hand history where you lose as a 62/38 favorite means the game is rigged.

this is like one of those bad ideas that show up on The Dragons Den.

wow this is fkn hilarious

real deal > Full Tilt

Lol soooooooo many douches in this thread, maybe people are scared of realdealpoker.... people seem to care .....

Easiest FYP ever?

Sorry not on here enough to know what fyp stands for

.. I only know it in my terms as final year project in university .

'Splains alot.

I don't think Gordias is the one who has to show his work, I think the burden is on the sites to show their deal is a fair one; e.g. through regular audits by independent and trustworthy parties. Until that happens, Gordias has all the right (IMO) to say whatever he feels about the honesty of the sites, it makes little difference to me whether what he says is real, anecdotal, or simply made up, because I'm a priori willing to believe it.

You mean like the millions of independent players who audit the output every day, something like that?

So far all those hand history audits have come out normal. If you have one that isn't, by all means publish it forthwith and let's get this party started.

Nope, the burden is on the accuser. Asking the sites to prove a negative is not only a logical fallacy but you already show your ignorance with this post by suggesting the sites should have audits by independent and trustworthy parties when they (at least the larger, more reputable ones) already do. Perhaps somebody like you will never be convinced that enough has been done, but you can't make everybody happy.

And yes, Gordias certainly does have the right to say certain things, as slanderous as some of them may be, and he can choose to look like a buffoon with his ridiculous statements if he so chooses.

Only a fool can supposedly see clear evidence of rigging and be too lazy to actually do the required work to call them out on the scandal.

why are all the shill tards in this thread hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm