Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
I think you're misunderstanding what people mean here when they say "white supremacist thought." We're not saying that the church member has some devious association with the KKK and he's trying to create an all-white America. Rather, the ideas associated with white supremacy have been absorbed into his mind through all the same ways that media gets them into the minds of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh viewers (hell, plenty of people of color absorb these sources). Remember that especially pre-2010, the media was very lowest common denominator and it's not like there was that much "black" media. Most black Americans watched white media for the most part and absorbed culture and ideas about race and society through those media.
Let me see if I can encapsulate this correctly and fairly.
White supremacy is probably the wrong term; perhaps lets call it "white culture" wanting "other cultures" to conform to the norms of "white culture".
Evidence of such advocacy include the ideas about the black community that Bill O'Reilly and Don Lemon agree on, the ideas that Bill Cosby espoused in the Pound Cake speech, or that Thomas Sowell would discuss on the racial disparities of today.
Whereas your view would be more akin to
Ta-Nehisi Coates' rebuttal of Bill Cosby, that the black community faces special problems that need to be addressed (police and judiciary). Further, many people are so whitewashed by "white culture" or have successfully conformed to "white culture", that they fail to recognize these problems, and don't think the solutions suggested by O'Reilly, Lemon, Cosby, Sowell, or the AME church are correct because white people in the heads of institution are still going to be racist, and all people are doing is mimicing white culture, but will never be white and will therefore not be accepted.
Is this a fair understanding of your position?
Last edited by Morishita System; 02-23-2017 at 04:32 PM.