What right wing ideals do I embrace? Go ahead, ask away, I will answer truthfully.

I don't consider things like supporting police right wing ideals. Maybe you do.

Torture, punching children, letting the police punch black guys.

Hey people, some lord is peopling about you.

See, the funny part is 'they' all thought of the white people. The example I like to use is that the original Black Panther Party considered themselves a socialist movement 1st and a black (em)power(ment) movement 2nd. All the civil rights and black power movements talked about class-based social welfare if not outright socialism. Thinking about the poor white people was baked in.

And these poor white people have had the chance to become allies on this front for at least the last 1/2 century but, especially based on this last election, have soundly rejected that notion.

chez gave me a TO because I keep referring to each poster as "lil homie gay ass"

Also, it's a sad sign of our times that I was inclined to start saying 'black (em)power(ment)' as a preemptive strike against the derplording 'wait so they can say black power but I can't say white power HALP I AM SO CONFUSED'.

wil, monistat, you, adios, random low-count posters, etc

You make me wish 137th trimester abortions were a thing.

Could that be because a racial/social (em)power(ment) movement is not supposed to be excercised as a matter of convenience or used superficiously as a form of nefarious leverage, but is to be excercised moreso as a response of true intention, true conviction and true commitment in resistance/resisting of legitimate forces of oppression and/or discrimination when one might examine more closely??

spankbabbler

Not to mention, I think your statement is complete and utter bullsheet. Cmon son, do better.




Totally unnecessary

Regards,

A Dumb Whitey

Just got to say this this:



is pretty satisfying. This is the only person I have ignored on this forum, and it has made for a much better experience. 5ive, I will occasionally click to show your posts or skim the discussions when you are quoted, since at one point you seemed fairly reasonable so I figured I would eventually undo the ignore, but at the moment na

The fact I cannot ignore the creepy pervert Kerowo on account of him modding some random forum on here is pretty weak though.

Welcome to my world.

Think they have safe space mods for browsers that make quoted posts and modgods words go away.

Links or it didnt happen

Have just read it on here from time to time, dont have any links. They might not even have them anymore. Its been a bit since ive seen someone talking about it.

They say it with such pride, too.

p.s.

False-belief task

One of the most important milestones in theory of mind development is gaining the ability to attribute false belief: that is, to recognize that others can have beliefs about the world that are diverging. To do this, it is suggested, one must understand how knowledge is formed, that people's beliefs are based on their knowledge, that mental states can differ from reality, and that people’s behavior can be predicted by their mental states. Numerous versions of the false-belief task have been developed, based on the initial task done by Wimmer and Perner (1983).[23]

In the most common version of the false-belief task (often called the "'Sally-Anne' test" or "'Sally-Anne' task"), children are told or shown a story involving two characters. For example, the child is shown two dolls, Sally and Anne, who have a basket and a box, respectively. Sally also has a marble, which she places into her basket, and then leaves the room. While she is out of the room, Anne takes the marble from the basket and puts it into the box. Sally returns, and the child is then asked where Sally will look for the marble. The child passes the task if she answers that Sally will look in the basket, where Sally put the marble; the child fails the task if she answers that Sally will look in the box, where the child knows the marble is hidden, even though Sally cannot know this, since she did not see it hidden there. To pass the task, the child must be able to understand that another’s mental representation of the situation is different from their own, and the child must be able to predict behavior based on that understanding.
Another example is when a boy leaves chocolate on a shelf and then leaves the room. His mother puts it in the fridge. To pass the task, the child must understand that the boy upon returning holds the false belief that his chocolate is still on the shelf.[24]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind

This worked for me

God send!

It's the part where they get kind of close to a point but then miss it and bask blissfully in their ignorance. Lord thinks he's hitting on a major breakthrough where class might be an issue. Um, yeah, that's kind of what certain people have been concerned about, a system that artificially keeps them in a lower class.

While ignoring that black people in higher paying jobs generally live in lower income communities, it's not a question of race or class it's both.

I've tossed it around for years, whether it's them stumbling into a point or part of willful propaganda, and I guess like many things, it depends. But, at some point in recent history white supremacist propaganda starting taking these lines, mentioning class-not-race ideas, and specific factoids about slavery in pre-colonial Africa, or how the Dutch brought East Indian slaves to Africa, and so forth, in an attempt to sorta 'attack from the left' in a smoke-and-mirrors fashion that does actually seem to work on the uninformed. Much of it you had to have read in, like, books, or learned in a university history class, and they took these non-politicized things and weaponized them. If a person believes slavery was horrible, finding out Africans enslaved other Africans and sold slaves to Europeans shouldn't change that, logically, ethically or morally, but... it does, or at least clouds the issue enough to an impressionable mind. It's the earlier and very sophisticated, relatively, version of 'All Lives Matter!'

I've realized the best approach is to attack it at the root, like:

"Ok, you mention class struggles but you're not a socialist, or a quasisocialist or some sort of quasisocialist sympathizer, so shut the **** up... Or, wait, you like these socialist ideas but only including certain nationalities, or excluding certain nationalities, right? Yes? Well, you're in luck, we already have a word for that."


p.s.

Or something like this:

This seems to be true.

The reality is there is no far left. There are liberals and everyone else to the left.

To the right of conservative, however, exists many different varieties of far right.
The difference lies in that most everyone to the left of liberal acts in a consistent manner.

The distance between the left and conservatives is indeed quite wide.

Ignoring wil is the tits.

If you ignore wil, you might miss out on the next epic wil meltdown.

I just get the meltdown in quoted posts, which might be better.