Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year !!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year

02-22-2017 , 08:58 AM
Also wil, I know you're dumb as **** and a life failure in the most profound way, but one thing "books" might have taught you is that Milo being a Jew and Milo being molested by a priest are two things that are unlikely to both be true!


Milo was raised Catholic, the Jew thing is something that he invented in his 30s trying to play garbage right wing identity politics after people started bitching about him wearing Iron Crosses and ****. He's absolutely not Jewish, he's a ****ing anti-Semite:

02-22-2017 , 09:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
Well, wil is ignorant as **** but in case anybody isn't aware:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right

Did you edit the wikipedia page before linking it?

Wouldn't surprise me

Alt-right definitions are vague and usually built to fit the narrative
02-22-2017 , 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Oh my god this is absolutely it. Wil lost his virginity at 29, immediately knocked up the first girl he ever slept with to "lock her in", and now he's getting older and more delusional and he imagines he could've been a player. ---


Also wil, I know you're dumb as **** and a life failure in the most profound way, but one thing "books" might have taught you is that Milo being a Jew and Milo being molested by a priest are two things that are unlikely to both be true!


Milo was raised Catholic, the Jew thing is something that he invented in his 30s trying to play garbage right wing identity politics after people started bitching about him wearing Iron Crosses and ****. He's absolutely not Jewish, he's a ****ing anti-Semite:

These last tow posts by FlyWF quite accurately summarises the quality of arguments against Wil's stance

Double standards of the forum. Had Wil said something like this he would have been banned.
02-22-2017 , 10:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kypreanus
These last tow posts by FlyWF quite accurately summarises the quality of arguments against Wil's stance

Double standards of the forum. Had Wil said something like this he would have been banned.
Wil's "stance" seems to be that these gay guys are some different type of breed of human beings. His only arguments are random anecdotes and "go search for online forums yourself". Since none of the facts and data support his stance(apart from made up numbers from uberreligious people), he has to resort to "look at this one outlier!" like a dumbass.

It's unintelligent, it's bigoted and homophobic and a line of thinking stuck in the 1950s. lol@u and chez for normalizing any of this.
02-22-2017 , 10:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Oh my god this is absolutely it. Wil lost his virginity at 29, immediately knocked up the first girl he ever slept with to "lock her in", and now he's getting older and more delusional and he imagines he could've been a player.
Lol, what is this? Like, you know what age I got married, and knew how long that relationship was. You think I lost my virginity at 29? No, of course not. Yet you'll say this in public? Why? To discredit yourself?

Hahaha. Get off my dick, bitch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Also wil, I know you're dumb as **** and a life failure in the most profound way,
Classic case of projection. I call you a life failure then you turn around and call me a life failure. You're a ****ing loser, Fly, and everyone knows it. Put some effort into your actual LIFE instead of being a prick on 2+2 and maybe you'll get your fat ass up and become a functioning human being who doesn't have to fap to tranny porn.


Quote:
but one thing "books" might have taught you is that Milo being a Jew and Milo being molested by a priest are two things that are unlikely to both be true!
Conspiracy theories abound! He says he's a jew, yet he got molested by a Catholic priest! Whuuuuuut? How is this possible? Must be false, says Fly.

I have no clue about this and I don't care. He made the claim. You doubting it doesn't make it untrue. I don't give a crap about Milo. If you are so convinced it's a lie, then go research it.

Quote:
Milo was raised Catholic, the Jew thing is something that he invented in his 30s trying to play garbage right wing identity politics after people started bitching about him wearing Iron Crosses and ****. He's absolutely not Jewish, he's a ****ing anti-Semite:
Well, it seems it you have it all figured out. He's an undercover Jew? My God. Go to the papers with this, Fly.
02-22-2017 , 10:17 AM
I can't keep up with this thread. Has Wil at least distanced himself from the opinion that a quarter of homosexuals have had lol 1000 sexual partners?!
02-22-2017 , 10:17 AM
I'd genuinely like to see the sampling and methodology, was the study ever linked?
02-22-2017 , 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
I was curious about wil's potential response before I remembered he has us both on ignore.
Well, we had a common theme in being put on ignore. We both use quotes. A lot. I hammered him with his line that punching a kid was the "best course of action" every time he tried to rewrite it. And then I hammered him by repeating his bigoted comments while he was claiming not to be a bigot. Wil don't like dat. Wil needs to be hammered on his comment that the number of gay male partners is "astronomical" until he confronts what he even meant by repeating that line in several different phrasing if he wasn't agreeing with his "study".

Allowing him to progress just allows him to keep posting his random thoughts in isolation, but a consistent narrative will never emerge. He's going to rewrite and dismiss in each instant, and then fall back on those parts anyway.
02-22-2017 , 11:04 AM
The above technique will result in Wil putting you on ignore, but eventually there'll be no one left for him to talk to, and that's when we'll be rid of his spew.
02-22-2017 , 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Oh God. WTF is this?

https://ageof****lords.com/4chan-kne...o-before-hand/

FYI the MSM has a huge ****ing media onslaught that is set to go live Monday to scorch earth Milo and destroy him via the pedophile label.

I'm part of a mailing list (not giving my real name or the name of the list for the sake of protecting my ass from retaliation) but they have been sitting on the story for a while, because they thought Milo was small fries and wanted to wait until he got big enough a thread to go nuclear on.

The journalists are pissed the **** off Maher put him on the air and more so, pissed off his book deal had not been revoked (and some are pissed that Milo got a book deal from the same publisher who dropped Zoe Quinn's book, along with a larger signing bonus than most of the publisher's social justice authors).

There are also those who want to hurt him simply as a proxy to hurt Steve Bannon/Breitbart. since their attempts to attack Bannon have largely failed. Not to mention people on the left being pissed off that most people sided with Milo over the rioters. Rioters, that were paid for by Soros through a variety of fronts and laundered through companies that can't be traced back to him.

Expect a steady drumbeat of "Milo is a pedophile" and "Milo must be dropped from CPAC". The later is especially important, in terms of the divide and conquer long game the press is playing: the press wants a civil war with the McCain/Graham wing of the GOP and the Trump/Ryan wing so as to weaken the Republicans in 2018. The overall plan is to make the Republicans fear social shaming from the media and the left more than they do their actual constituents who love Trump, in hopes of regaining the House and enough Senate seats to pull off an impeachment of Trump.
Lmao Wil believes this **** but has problems with ok Cupid. This is what happens when you have no bull**** meter.
02-22-2017 , 11:53 AM
Has Milo's purported black boyfriend ever been photographed? Do we know for sure that wasn't just a fabrication?
02-22-2017 , 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC
Wil's "stance" seems to be that these gay guys are some different type of breed of human beings. His only arguments are random anecdotes and "go search for online forums yourself". Since none of the facts and data support his stance(apart from made up numbers from uberreligious people), he has to resort to "look at this one outlier!" like a dumbass.

It's unintelligent, it's bigoted and homophobic and a line of thinking stuck in the 1950s. lol@u and chez for normalizing any of this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
I can't keep up with this thread. Has Wil at least distanced himself from the opinion that a quarter of homosexuals have had lol 1000 sexual partners?!
I've never made any of these claims, ever. Both of you are welcome to quote me, as I've asked aoFrantic at least 5 times yesterday to quote me.

It's bizarre you would even say something like this. There is nothing "abnormal" or strange about any of it. If you think it's abnormal, YOU are the one who has the issue, not me. I do not pass judgement on people, they can live however they want and do whatever they want as long as no one is getting hurt. Both of YOU are the bigots here, not me.

Your reactions to this claim is exactly why there is an agenda against it, because people like you react in this bizarre way and pass judgement on others. YOU are the problem, not me.

GO LOOK IT UP FOR YOURSELVES.
02-22-2017 , 12:03 PM
Wil strongly in favor of post deletions because they cover his ass.
02-22-2017 , 12:10 PM
What exactly are we supposed to look up? Stop being so incoherent.
02-22-2017 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
The above technique will result in Wil putting you on ignore, but eventually there'll be no one left for him to talk to, and that's when we'll be rid of his spew.
Lol wil puts multiple posters on ignore and then tells them he's done so? What a safe space cuck!
02-22-2017 , 12:13 PM
Oh **** are cucks a vulnerable protected group?
02-22-2017 , 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC
What exactly are we supposed to look up? Stop being so incoherent.
Read the thread. It's laid out pretty easily. Go do the research yourself, it'll take about 10 minutes.

You seem to be a closed-minded bigot when it comes to this argument. You should grow up.
02-22-2017 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Wil strongly in favor of post deletions because they cover his ass.
Lol, you have no idea what you're talking about. I'm absolutely proud of my posts here, I'm the only person who's actually being honest and open about the topic. The rest of you want to attack me and discredit me and handwave my claims away. The only problem is, well, that I'm actually right.

You don't have to believe me. I don't even want you to believe me. I want you to go look it up yourself.
02-22-2017 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC
Wil's "stance" seems to be that these gay guys are some different type of breed of human beings.
I'm still waiting for a quote on this. Please quote.
02-22-2017 , 12:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I've never made any of these claims, ever. Both of you are welcome to quote me, as I've asked aoFrantic at least 5 times yesterday to quote me.
See, wil's exact term was "astronomical", and he repeated several wordings of that, as recently highlighted by 5ive. But Wil has absolutely no self-awareness and no recollection of saying this, because Wil never creates any kind of consistent narrative, as I discussed.
02-22-2017 , 12:22 PM
I don't think we've seen the last of Milo, not by a long shot. More mainstream outlets like FOX and CPAC will distance themselves, but the derposphere has plenty of fringe outlets and publishers that will welcome him on board. The only real danger is if his raging personality disorder sabotages his career or if everyone gets bored of the act and moves on.
02-22-2017 , 12:23 PM
You can take it to the lgbtq thread if it stops you from speaking in these riddles.
What do you think our position is and where do you disagree?

I tried it the other way in that I understand you think gay ppl are massively more promiscuous, are you walking back on this one or what?
02-22-2017 , 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
real men drink. A lot.
Trump doesn't drink, so this theory checks out.
02-22-2017 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I've never made any of these claims, ever. Both of you are welcome to quote me, as I've asked aoFrantic at least 5 times yesterday to quote me.

It's bizarre you would even say something like this. There is nothing "abnormal" or strange about any of it. If you think it's abnormal, YOU are the one who has the issue, not me. I do not pass judgement on people, they can live however they want and do whatever they want as long as no one is getting hurt. Both of YOU are the bigots here, not me.

Your reactions to this claim is exactly why there is an agenda against it, because people like you react in this bizarre way and pass judgement on others. YOU are the problem, not me.

GO LOOK IT UP FOR YOURSELVES.
You cited a study that claimed 1k sex partners for some substantial percentage of gay people did you not? I'm not going back 60 pages to look for it, I remember it happening vividly.
02-22-2017 , 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC
You can take it to the lgbtq thread if it stops you from speaking in these riddles.
What do you think our position is and where do you disagree?

I tried it the other way in that I understand you think gay ppl are massively more promiscuous, are you walking back on this one or what?
I think your position is to pass judgment on other people's lives. Open your mind up and stop being so bigoted about it. You are the one with the issue here, not me. If you are arguing I'm incorrect, then go look it the **** up. It's NOT HARD TO GOOGLE IT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
You cited a study that claimed 1k sex partners for some substantial percentage of gay people did you not? I'm not going back 60 pages to look for it, I remember it happening vividly.
No, I didn't. If you don't want to scroll back and read it then don't bother discussing it. Chez asked me to stop talking about it, so I won't link or make any other claims. You are welcome to look up my claims yourself. If you choose not to and just attack me, fine, but that doesn't make you correct.

You are wrong, and if you simply looked it up yourselves, you'd realize it.

      
m