Oh look, it's chez immediately going to shelter wil by not allowing us the right to criticize him for being pro-pedophilia.

Mat Sklansky this is what I mean lol.

LMAO, what a load of crap. We can either have a thread to insult each other or a thread to talk about things but not both. Notice that name calling hasn't had anything to do with what Wil's been advocating in this go round. No one is complaining that he is calling them names. Everyone is complaining that he is advocating sex with underage people and making **** up about the gays. You are so ****ing bad at your job it's just pathetic.

Chez, you can frantically search your name and respond to me every time I call you out, but when you're clearly reading the thread you can't say a word about reprehensible **** from Wil? Do you have any morals?

You are ignorant of basic facts. Is it controversial to say males are more promiscuous than females? If that is true, is it a stretch to say relationships strictly involving males may have higher rates of sexual activity than ones with both?

Do either of you have ANY clue what you are talking about? Do you have gay malr friends, hang out with them, talk to them about sex at all?

As usual, discussing things with white suburban males is hilariously futile. I'd tell you to call one of your gay friends but I'm absolutely positive you don't have any.

chezlaw frantically trying to invent a rule he can apply to get liberals to stop talking about how Milo, a goddamn HERO to the freeze peach absolutist alt-right, turned out to endorse "intergenerational relationships"

I'm going to shut down a discussion that is unacceptable. You may prefer it was left open but it wont be.

I think you should probably ban or temp ban wil for his disgusting views on sex between adults and children, and dishonest attempts to feign innocence once he realised he was in hot water.

You haven't shown how any of this grants the ability to consent to sex to a 13 year old. HINT: It doesn't, under our laws 13 year olds can't grant consent.

Oh and yeah not one ****ing peep of protest from chez about wil posting insane **** about how gays are sexually deviant and 28% of them(1 in 4) have had 1000 sexual partners.

But boy-howdy I do expect a lot of "move ons" if anyone calls wil a homophobe in the future! That's making up stuff to be mean!

chez are you going to lock a thread about a significant ongoing political story because it embarrasses the right? Great look, man, really helping create a Safe Space for The Discourse.

Wil posted a site that doesn't believe in evolution but believes in the story of Noah's Arc literally, citing a book by christian religious zealots from the 70s I believe that gay men are much more promiscuous than straight men, and on average have about 75x the average partners the average straight male does. This would seem ridiculous to someone with an IQ of like, 73.

Now, instead of say anything bad about Wil posting homophobic propaganda on this website, Chezlaw is insisting we shut up. This is ****ing outrageous that someone posted homophobic propaganda and didn't even get a warning, and those attacking his homophobia are being told to shut up.

Chezlaw, you don't have any morals. You don't have a spine. You're no better than Wil.

Lol @ this. If anyone should be banned it's you.

There will definitely be a thread where the Milo story can continue to be be discussed.

The point is that's now become a serious story rather than a load of old nonsense that I could ignore.

Nope. Studies show they generally have the same amount of partners.
On average, my straight male friends have had more partners than their gay male counterparts because they generally didn't come out of the closet until their 20s.

I'm pretty confident nobody has even had 1000 sexual partners through tinder, never mind that near half of all gay males are having a different partner a week for over 20 years. The math on the gay population needed in every population centre to support this is astounding. The basic math of it doesn't ****ing work.

wil, wake up and look around. What do you see, here and in P (assuming you have read access)?

Excellent modding there Capt'n, just how much of your forum do you routinely ignore? I see you don't give a **** that the President Trump thread has become the bahabha minimum wage thread, but's a content thread, not one you take seriously...

Everybody pm Mat.

That is not the measure that requires to be taken.

Which study, exactly, are you talking about? I just showed you a study that showed wildly different numbers. That was the point of me linking it.

Milo made these statements years ago, and also this ain't the first time he's said or done awful things. Why were those negative aspects of the Milo experience ignorable for you?

What specifically is the need to close this thread, beyond that a lot of your ideological allies accidentally caped up for a white supremacist before realizing he was a white supremacist PEDOPHILE? And, troublingly, learning that for a lot of people even that isn't a bridge too far?

Seems like that has some relevance to Politics here on Two Plus Two.

Oh look, safe spaces on demand.

LOL and apparently Breitbart is currently debating whether or not to fire him

Wil remains without a hint of a warning for:
encouraging pedophilia
engaging in many homophobic comments

But, we're going to lock a thread to not embarrass a guy who is defending pedophilia and actively promoting homophobia. Good job Chezlaw.

Is this what I've been missing in P 7.0 this whole time?

Mat Sklansky has to have a sick sense of humor to give modship to chez.

lol @ Breitbart "debating" firing Milo. They're just waiting for this to blow over. He isn't going anywhere.

Yes this forum is definitely going to be a safe space from defending paedophilia