Incidentally wil, did you hear Milo's apology thingy? He admitted it was abuse when his priest diddled him! This bizzare take you're working on where it's okay for gay dudes to bone 13-year olds... it isnt a hill you have to die on, my dude.

Yeah I am not disagreeing with you really, merely stating that the OKCupid blog post should only be used as a soft reference and not considered as anything else.

I believe that for the following 6 groups: heterosexual male, homosexual male, heterosexual female, heterosexual male, bisexual male, and bisexual female, that there will be non-negligible differences in various sexual activity statistics.

But that these numbers would be within reasonable bounds, particularly if only considering say within two std dev (~95%).

Wil dies on every hill. I imagine Edge of Tomorrow is his favorite movie.

You've read the comments that I directed you to? You understand that these people weren't lying, right? You also realize that the amount of activity is not what most of us would be accustomed to, correct?

You are not being honest in this at all. If you actually read gay websites and read what the members write, you'd learn something. Which websites have you actually visited? You are so big on linking, then link to where you've visited that disputed my claim (with a large amount of responses) and we'd be happy to take a look.

Hint : You won't, because you can't, because I'm right.

Agreed.

With courtesy of Bladesman87:

That's beside the things you have edited or removed by the mod of course.

It's bizarre that at the same time you're trying to say that you posted the radical christian site's survey from 1978 only because it was ludicrous and wrong, but are defending their numbers. How do you not see this as contradictory? You can't disavow something then defend it post after post.

Just more idiocy out of you. Yes, I don't have gay friends currently, but I've had a lot of exposure to them in my past. It's just a coincidence that I don't have any currently. I care nothing about your psychology course, and if you really want to know I almost majored in it, so I've taken quite a few of them. That means nothing.

You are wrong about everything. You are especially wrong about what we discussed in terms of partners. It's not hard to find the evidence to support my claim, it's literally a google search away.

Then post it you wimp.

Avoiding most of the debate completely, I'd just like to point out that heavily entrenched sexism means that there's an extreme difference in the attitude towards promiscuity in men than there is in the attitude towards women.

That's going to reflect both in how promiscuous people are, and in how they report about it.

The 1/3 and 3/1 rules from American Pie were ahead of their time.

I haven't followed the whole conversation but from those posts above it doesnt seem like he was using the term "completely foreign" in a derogatory manner.

For what its worth alot of the gay guys iv worked with and are mates with would probably agree with Will. Obviously that is extremely anecdotal though.

As for the Milo thing unsure what to make of it. Some of the stuff he said was pretty disgusting but he claims that he was taken out of context so im going to rewatch both interviews in full before casting full judgement. I had heard one of the podcasts before (Rogans) but wasnt paying attention fully and at the time it just sounded like a victim of sexual abuse who was trying to make excuses for his abusers. I though the whole thing was very sad and that it was quite tragic honestly felt really bad for him.

The situation he described at Hollywood parties he should have reported though extremely irresponsible of him.

Regardless I think he is spot on when he talks about free speech and the regressive left even if I disagree with other stuff he says.

Yeah, AND? Where did I say it is deviant behavior or wrong, or even hinted that it was in any way a negative? I described it as "different", not "bad".

Do you know how English works? "Foreign" doesn't mean "bad'. "Astronomical" doesn't mean "bad". "Abnormal" doesn't mean "bad". It's just not what the majority of people are accustomed to. It's different, and different doesn't mean it's wrong. YOU are the one with the problem with it, not me.

So, the link Wil found that PROVES that gay people have an astronomical amount of sex? Again, let's state that this was an online anonymous forum, much smaller than 2p2. This thread was five years ago. An anonymous dude posts that he has had 1,500 partners in an LGBT forum. The responses?

I can post countless stories, written from people on these websites if Chez allows it. It'll prove my point.

It's up to Chez. If he allows it I'd be happy to do it, but it'll be a long ass post and I think it could possibly do more harm than good because people like you are bigots and are judgmental of other people's sex lives.

You're probably a slut-shamer, aren't ya?

"black people are really fast runners"
while a compliment, is racist, do you see?

Disregarding all that, there have been like 500 posts saying and proving that you are full of **** in this claim. No matter how many hundreds of times you keep saying you're right doesn't make it true. Post your evidence that gay men are magnitudes more promiscuous than other forms of partnerships.

Go ahead, post the link. People can go read that thread themselves. It 100% proves my point, you cherry picked a certain type of response.

This is why you are a lying sack of ****. POST THE LINK.

If Chez will allow it, I will.

So, even the "proof" Wil uses is that on an LGBT forum a dude made a post about having 1,500 lifetime partners as a 40 year old man and an LGBT community eviscerated him. This is his evidence that such behaviour is commonplace.

Milo: Here's an edgy joke about ****ing children!

Liberals: Outrageous! Off with his head!

Milo: Sorry, I was just pretending to be a pedo bcoz I'm a mental case.

Wil: No, for real, diddling kids is no big deal. That's standard for gay dudes.

The problem is you provided zero evidence of these claims of the gays having an astronomical number of partners

Link the website and let everyone come to their own conclusions.

The best part is every source he has ends up being full of ****.
His first source? A radical christian theology website that believes Noah's Arc as a literal truth.
His second source? A blog by a 20 year old.
His third source? An anonymous post on an LGBT forum where the rest of the forum calls the dude a whore.

Wil, just tell the truth. You didn't read the comments on the thread you found as "proof." You never do your homework.

Ahahahahah

"I would back up my claims but the mods won't let me link to hate sites"

Actually, I sort of agree that Wil didn't intend those comments in a derogatory way. I think more on the lines that Wil is so stupid he's saying stuff like "did you know gays are aliens? Wtf are you mad at me for, there's nothing wrong with being from Mars."

What Wil never understands is that these ideas of his can be damaging even if he doesn't have a problem with the idea that gays are just having sex mindlessly whenever and wherever. That's how he ends up linking to religious propaganda with a total lack of self awareness.

The idea that gay people are largely the same as the rest of us is a shock to his senses that he just can't handle.

It's up to Wil to explain what he means by "astronomical" and "completely foreign lifestyle", because on the face of it is absurd and insulting.