Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year !!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year

02-21-2017 , 09:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I think it's safe to say Milo's career is over.
Doubt it. He'll just venture off on his own, be his own brand.
02-21-2017 , 09:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shifty86
Doubt it. He'll just venture off on his own, be his own brand.
No, I don't think so. He's done. No one will book him now and I think he's 100% never speaking on a college campus again.

His career is toast. He may possibly be able to sell books but that's it. I don't see how he could possibly survive now.

He went from being on Bill Maher a few days ago to contemplating suicide today. He did it to himself.
02-21-2017 , 09:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_Crispen
Did you?
Well, yes. What kind of question is this?
02-21-2017 , 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
This is another lie Wil won't backup. The whole thing is patently false, this pattern of behaviour began on something awful then moved to 4chan where milo became their hero. It was never a "left" thing.
I'm quickly starting to think you might be dumber than kerowo. That's quite an accomplishment. In fact, your behavior is almost indistinguishable to his, except I actually think you lie more. Both of you are incredibly stupid people.

How do you people actually get through life?
02-21-2017 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
This is not how Milo rose to power.

Did you follow his career at all?
This blatant refusal to see the cruelty right in front of your face reminds me of the legacy of Jim Crow we have here in the Deep South. You can draw a straight line from Jim Crow to voter suppression and racial profiling and all other forms of brutality today, but to many people it simply doesn't exist and they absolutely will never acknowledge it. It seems as though you can also draw a straight line from that kind of cruelty and taking pride in power over vulnerable people to today's heroes of the conservative movement like Milo and Donald Trump. This is a big part of what people are talking about when they say that the Republican party has become the party of white supremacy. White supremacy has always been inflicted through disenfranchisement and cruelty. Milo is nothing new or special, really. He's just another in a centuries-long line of exploiters who take advantage of their white and privileged position in U.S. society. It is rather astounding that people cannot see that when it's directly in front of their faces.
02-21-2017 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
This blatant refusal to see the cruelty right in front of your face reminds me of the legacy of Jim Crow we have here in the Deep South. You can draw a straight line from Jim Crow to voter suppression and racial profiling and all other forms of brutality today, but to many people it simply doesn't exist and they absolutely will never acknowledge it. It seems as though you can also draw a straight line from that kind of cruelty and taking pride in power over vulnerable people to today's heroes of the conservative movement like Milo and Donald Trump. This is a big part of what people are talking about when they say that the Republican party has become the party of white supremacy. White supremacy has always been inflicted through disenfranchisement and cruelty. Milo is nothing new or special, really. He's just another in a centuries-long line of exploiters who take advantage of their white and privileged position in U.S. society. It is rather astounding that people cannot see that when it's directly in front of their faces.
He's a gay jew that dates black men.

What are you even talking about?
02-21-2017 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Sooner or later you folks are going to have to admit the truth: you enjoy and revel in cruelty as long as it's towards the right targets. And that's why the vast majority of people reject Milo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
The left has been doing this for years. This is what happens. Did you not think there would be a natural progression? They feel as if they are under attack, and they will use the same tactics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
What hero of the left rose to power through cruelty, doxxing, and hacking of vulnerable targets?

Also

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
This is not how Milo rose to power.

Did you follow his career at all?

Of course, we have gotten zero names of people on the left doing the same.
02-21-2017 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
He's a gay jew that dates black men.
What does that have to do with anything?

Quote:
What are you even talking about?
His documented acts of cruelty that he has built his career on, you know, the ones I've patiently linked to over the last several pages of this thread.
02-21-2017 , 10:30 PM
Yeah I'm 98% positive wil mentioned numerous times he doesn't know anything about Milo and hasn't followed, but w/e, that's boring.

What's interesting is how he keeps repeating that people don't know anything about him. He's overshared so much over the years any halfway clever person could find his real identity. I'm not encouraging this, just illustrating the extent he's shared.

I've actually refrained from mentioning personal info about him to not look like a creep and to not give that info to people with limited exposure to wil, but, ****, he's shared a lotttttt and I have a good memory.
02-21-2017 , 10:31 PM
5ive,

Did ikes ever get placed in a residency program?
02-21-2017 , 10:31 PM
Does he honestly not remember any of it?

I mean, I can understand not remembering the specifics you've shared, but would anybody simply not remember sharing so much?
02-21-2017 , 10:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
5ive,

Did ikes ever get placed in a residency program?
Lol I dunno, I don't do doxxing, but that was the best example I could think of for how much wil has shared about himself ITF.
02-21-2017 , 10:35 PM
I'm really more referencing the iceberg principle as it relates to the theory of mind.
02-21-2017 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Of course, we have gotten zero names of people on the left doing the same.
Did you do that research to get to the bottom of that discussion we were having?

Lol. Let me guess, you're going to say no, right?

You are funny.
02-21-2017 , 10:39 PM
By excusing Donald Trump’s behavior, some evangelical leaders enabled the internet provocateur’s ascent.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...utm_source=twb
Quote:
Milo’s ascent over the last year was, to a tragic extent, enabled by the willingness of some evangelical leaders to offer their endorsement for the very behavior on display today.

In 2016, there was a lot of discussion about evangelical support for Trump. I grew up in a southern evangelical home with my father, a reverend and seminary professor. And while support from voters like me was treated as a foregone conclusion by conservatives, I was among many people who questioned how leaders of the movement could look past revelations that Trump had been recorded making crass, if not actionable, comments about women while talking to Billy Bush several years earlier. This criticism didn’t come from a place of perfection; certainly we’ve all said and done things we regret.

The criticism was that Trump seemed unapologetic, giving no indication that the man in the recording was not the same man up on stage claiming to possess the moral and ethical clarity needed to clean up Washington, D.C. and “Make America Great Again.”

Indeed, it soon became clear he lacked that sort of clarity, but the overwhelming response from evangelical leaders was indifference.

After a dozen women came forward to claim that they had all personally interacted with the version of Trump heard in that recording, Trump offered no indication he was not the man they accused him of being. He issued some threats about lawsuits, pointed to the behavior of Bill Clinton, and hid behind the evangelical support he enjoyed as proof that the criticisms were moot. The message: He could grab a woman by her—wherever—in the middle of 5th Avenue and not lose their votes.

In spite of this, Franklin Graham, Jerry Falwell Jr., Robert Jeffress and others continued to provide the spiritual security that their religious followers needed to feel okay with their vote. They went on TV, tweeted support, wrote articles, met with the president, and came out emphasizing that Hillary Clinton was worse.

Some went so far as to interpret biblical passages to accommodate their newly flexible worldview, a stark contrast to the principled stand many of them (or the fathers on whose credibility they trade) took in the 1990s when a Democrat was the president.

Evangelical leaders of this stripe seemed to indicate that such petty and insignificant things as “moral depravity” were irrelevant now that the questions were raised by a Republican.

White evangelicals voted for Trump by a wide margin; eighty percent supported him, according to exit polls. But the election didn’t resolve the questions; a month into his presidency, Trump supporters are still defending the indefensible.

Yiannopoulos is simply an extension of the moral ambiguity that evangelical leadership has helped to solidify on the right. Instead of certitude or clarity, many of the national leaders who are responsible for helping to guide millions of Christians trying to navigate the muddy waters of life in American politics have opted for moral relativism. They gave Trump a pass. Will evangelicals now give Trump’s surrogates and spokespersons a pass as well?
02-21-2017 , 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
What does that have to do with anything?

His documented acts of cruelty that he has built his career on, you know, the ones I've patiently linked to over the last several pages of this thread.
You called the dude a white supremacist. I replied that he was a gay jew.

He didn't build his career on cruelty. He built it on his discussion of topics and humor. How do you actually build a career on cruelty?

Explain it. If I started tweeting mean stuff about Lena Dunham being overweight and ugly, I can build a career like that?

You don't make sense here at all. Then you go on this white supremacy tangent. What's your point? We know Milo can be a dick. Everyone knows that. Its not what made him famous.
02-21-2017 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
By excusing Donald Trump’s behavior, some evangelical leaders enabled the internet provocateur’s ascent.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...utm_source=twb
How many women voted for Trump? You know, the people he spoke bad about?

Why do you think he received that % of that demographic?
02-21-2017 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
The left has been doing this for years. This is what happens. Did you not think there would be a natural progression? They feel as if they are under attack, and they will use the same tactics.
These devious left wing tactics include posing unedited videos of things Milo actually said, writing disapproving posts on the internet, and maybe even the comfy chair!

*DIABOLICAL LAUGHTER*


For real tho, like less than a week ago y'all were telling me that liberal resentment was feeding people like Milo. "Oh, those SJWs and their over-reactions have created this monster! If only they'd all been quiet Milo would never have been a thing!" Now I find out that these liberals were actually engaged in destroying the career of this promising young entrepreneur/college dropout?
02-21-2017 , 11:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
How many women voted for Trump? You know, the people he spoke bad about?

Why do you think he received that % of that demographic?
Clinton won among women by 54 percent to 42 percent.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news...us-presidency/
02-21-2017 , 11:08 PM
Uh wil, milo literally gained prominence from gamergate. Might want to do your research again.

BTW I saw where you got your "facts" from. The source is literally worse than elitedaily or a radical Christian site. You are so, so bad at Google.
02-21-2017 , 11:11 PM
Without the SJW movement there is no alt right. The reason they exist is to directly oppose the SJW positions. They simply take up the other side of the argument. Most people don't care about these labels. I know I don't.

As far as outing people, the left has been doing this for years. I mean, you guys do this to me on this website. This is the internet though, so whatever, but in the real world there are real consequences. People self censor. It's an actual thing, as much as you'd love to think otherwise.

This is why when I tell you people that everyone despises you, I know many of you truly think I'm wrong because you don't see it and you don't hear it. It's because people don't want to get into an argument. Just because they don't come out and tell you they hate you, trust me, they hate you.
02-21-2017 , 11:12 PM
This is what I was talking about when I said Milo rose up on a wave of cruelty and white supremacy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
It's not a mistake, it's his entire game.



Quote:
Leslie Jones’ website hacked, with nude photos and personal information exposed
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...icle-1.2764043
And his other claim to fame is writing cruel articles about women and other groups in Breitbart:
The Solution To Online ‘Harassment’ Is Simple: Women Should Log Off
http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/0...women-log-off/

FULL TEXT: MILO on why Cyberbullying Isn’t Real
http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2017/0...lyingisntreal/

MILO: Hollywood Leftists, Stop Being Racist and Move to Cuba
http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/1...on-hello-cuba/

And the list just goes on and on and on, attacking feminism, undocumented immigrants, black Americans with Harambe memes and by calling Leslie Jones illiterate, he has made his entire career on cruelty. The question we shouldn't be asking is why did CPAC dump him, that much is obvious. The question we should be asking instead is, what kind of a society do we have where this person was given such a prominent platform in the first place? Why does America have such a love for and obsession with cruelty? What does this say about us and what does it mean?
02-21-2017 , 11:12 PM
Wil, you genuinely have no knowledge about somethingawful/4chan, aka where this all started. Perhaps to avoid making another 20 terrible posts, you could do you research now?

Wil, you don't know what "outing" means. If you are in fact correct, you probably should tell your wife about this.
02-21-2017 , 11:15 PM
More info on all that background stuff:
https://medium.com/@DaleBeran/4chan-...8cb#.fmj33ueqf
02-21-2017 , 11:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
These devious left wing tactics include posing unedited videos of things Milo actually said, writing disapproving posts on the internet, and maybe even the comfy chair!

*DIABOLICAL LAUGHTER*


For real tho, like less than a week ago y'all were telling me that liberal resentment was feeding people like Milo. "Oh, those SJWs and their over-reactions have created this monster! If only they'd all been quiet Milo would never have been a thing!" Now I find out that these liberals were actually engaged in destroying the career of this promising young entrepreneur/college dropout?
In a week we went from "liberal outrage is only making him more popular" to "his career is over."

      
m