Best procedure for him. I unignored him once. But nah.

Herding together around derision, mockery, and excessive argumentation lacks responsibility and authority. You can't hide behind each other at this point either. It's been too much, too long.

Spank against a multiplicative event of noted unduly hardship attacks free Viagra click here

See how Anais looks progressively with each additional futile and uninformative derisive post? Is stupider and stupider an apt description?

What kind of educated person wants to keep on with needless and excessive argumentation in a serious topic such as racism? Show a distinct lack of self-authority for people to continue to choose to behave this way and no apparent sense of responsibility for the consequences of behavior which perpetuates conflicts rather than settle them.

So the question is why won't they stop when asked like any person could? Why persist in derision and mockery when it is a big continuous failure?

Seriosity runs parallel to this thread, not perpendicular. Futility and cohesion go hand in hand with lethargically correct advances of autonomic disappropriateness

So does Anais have a bias against examining his own behavior? That would explain why he takes direct criticism of his observable behavior and shallowly mocks it as nonsense at another's expense. Or maybe he feels unfairly criticsized and is lashing out defensively? If it were that unfair, it wouldn't be so observable. But we can relate, people do tend to become defensive when confronted with criticism, fair or unfair.

What ever is floating Anais's boat, it is not actually a problem of mine personally, or else it would be solvable in public without excessive argumentation, mockery, and derision. These are not proven approaches to solving problem. Accurately defining a problem specifically is more my approach.

Accurately defining a problem specifically is more my approach.

Now that I think about it there's like 6 blacks that work at my company and there names are Anthony, Gary, Ryan, Dwayne, Derek and Kevin. Bastards probably aren't calling the Deshawn's Darnell's and Jamal's back.

I know I have been insulting and argumentative, sometimes on purpose. Actually just about everybody has on this topic. It's now a matter of who can stop doing so excessively.

lol spanktehbadhypocrite

So when do you plan to stop arguing? Because that's all you ****ing do.

If you want to stop arguing, you are free do so. However you have a long historic string of one-line accusations that are supported only by derision and mockery, so you are in the same boat as Anais when it comes to participation on this topic with excessive argumentation. Really more accurately described as almost persistent acrimonious argumentation.

Explain your accusation of hypocrisy. You cry wolf about hypocrisy a lot.

Btw- why haven't you guys piled on that racist that was posting yesterday?

Why do you instead try and fail to pile on people who seem to have a grasp and an interest in understanding and discussing racism and ignore the self-proclaimed racist who seemed ripe for acrimonious confrontation?

The behavior here is baffling enough to openly consider.

spanktehbadwookie
This message is hidden because spanktehbadwookie is on your ignore list.

spanktehbadwookie
This message is hidden because spanktehbadwookie is on your ignore list.

spanktehbadwookie
This message is hidden because spanktehbadwookie is on your ignore list.


Someone is desperate.

You mean that one I immediately reported who got OTB&Ced?

Also lol at spank popping evasion

So you can read and that means it is likely you are simply in denial of your own behavior. I wonder if I reported the post faster than you?

So how is hating on people a whole bunch and day to day constantly really helping you or your community? Or is there another way to describe behavior such as yours and Paul D which isn't hate? What else besides hate causes needless and persistent mockery and derision up to the point of slurs and dehumanization?

Maybe publicly advocating ignoring your critics gives you a false sense that you are immune to criticism? But isn't that just a implicit acceptance the criticism is valid? If it were invalid, you would contest it fairly, rather than resort to obvious avoidance methods.

The Hulkster's koan: Does the SMP poster have Buddha-nature?

The Buddha is everywhere, brother.

The quality of spank's posts hasn't changed at all, just who he's agreeing/disagreeing with. So, apparently you think a good poster is someone who agrees with you. Pretty childish worldview.

What is the sound of one wrestler being bodyslammed?

I'm going to guess that whoever saw the post first probably reported it first. Pretty sure you posted before I did, so you probably did first.

Faster? Dunno. Did you report before or after making a post?

Also, quite possibly the stupidest metric known to man

So spank was constantly whining about peoples behaviour before he was a mod? Wanna bet on that?

I'm not whining. You should know by now I criticize behaviors such as being excessively argumentative. Like this accusation of whining you have made here is an example of being excessively argumentative.

The fact the posts of excessive argumentation, derision, mockery, and accusation do not influence my present emotions means I have no need or reason to whine or react otherwise emotionally while criticizing the behavior. I'm happy this is out in the open and it seems clear to me the conflict is more settleable once people choose to stop the excessive arguing.