While most of the accusations against you are unfounded, you often can be quite cryptic, as you appear to be in this post. (What is a "deceased reputation"? A "bad" reputation? Or the reputation of a user who refrains from debate or is unable to participate? Apparently you mean the former.)

Quit caring what other people think about you spank, especially in a troll-ridden cesspool like 2+2. Until you quit posting, your reputation is not dead, merely changing. (If you believe otherwise, just make a new account and start fresh, like LowKey, MissileDog, et al.)

When you quit correcting misconceptions, then you allow detractors to set the agenda; however, these anti-social haters will use this as leverage to keep you interacting, because no one would freely mingle among their boorish personalities otherwise, so sometimes the only way to win is not to play. (Anyone who hangs around here for more than a week can easily discern the trolls from sincere posters, though.)



Ultimately, your choice is all that matters, and it isn't subject to the whims of others, save moderators which supposedly serve the interests of the property owners of the site; yet, it seems you've abandoned determining the validity of MrWookie's claims of racism altogether. (How easily you are distracted and misled!)

If you would like to discuss rights, feel free to take it to the Anarchy thread, where the topic has been discussed multiple times.

I don't think he meant seeing apologies from you, he thought you meant that you were witness to Bruce's apologies.

stfu you whiny lying scumbag of a bitch

you too you ****ing redneck hick

lol posts like this are why i still check this thread, i don't have the energy or desire to be so eloquent and creative in my insulting of smug morans

Looks like spanky is practicing excessive mockery and derision upon proph without substance. This is indicative by the presence of excessive mocking and derisive behavior which is connected with it in a pattern, a patently dishonest and misleading question for the purpose of intentionally inviting excessive argumentation.

I gave it the due consideration Id give to anything posted from the mentally troubled shut in crew.

Are you ever going to get around to what you think actually should have happened you blubbering ****ing baby?

That's true, but it seems unlikely that all the people who owed Bruce apologies would ever provide any, so given that, it's entirely reasonable for him to skip his own part of that.

I did. Bruce should have been allowed to carry on modding the probability forum under the understanding he would avoid controversy for 3 months and then continued to demonstrate he had learned from his mistakes.

That was never going to be enough for wookie it now seems clear - If wookie wants to correct me he can easily explain how the above would have been acceptable in some shape or form.

Could you provide links to the posts people should apologize for?

sure, that's a good point, if bruce is a 5 year old

Threaten, threaten, threaten.

But oh, that would be wrong!

So that's how a mod is supposed to threaten people? So basically, people can issue any threat they want as long as they say something like "but I wouldn't do that" or "j/k" at the end?

Every single one that called him racist.

lol

The truth typically absolves one from recompense. Moran.

chez, since you continue alluding to conversations that allegedly happened in the mod forum (which afaik you do not have access to), I believe you may be suffering from a missing bits scenario.

People talk about being immature but it's not mature to demand the unreasonable apologies that wookie clearly was.

We had a valued part/contributor to 2+2 who after 15+ reacted badly in a heated situation. The mature thing to do was to seek to cool things down, draw a line under it and move on with an agreement from him to demonstrate he had learned.

Didn't he try that? And lasted about 3 or 4 days before he melted down again and threatened PVN? Am I missing any bits here?

I'm sorry both you and your butt buddy Bruce are such imbecilic infants that neither of you can process concepts in an adult fashion and might become offended due to that lack of intellect and maturity.

There. I apologized. At least, as much as Bruce did, right?

My perception is that there was a point where Bruce could have done something like that. He would have had to suck it up and tolerate vigorous criticism, leaving it unanswered if necessary. I don't think other posters should have been obligated to not provoke him.

Is it your contention that there was unseen politicking by Wookie in the mod forum that led to Mat Sklansky caving on his initial declaration that Bruce would not be de-greened?

It's not a total loss, we did get this hilarious thread. I get more entertainment from it than I ever did from this BruceZ character I never heard of (although the icing would be if he took a break from his self-exile to pop by and give us his views on this thread.)

So, when all the children in school mock a child because their father is dead, it's okay? Nice try, but no. It's bullying whether it's true or not and it's not acceptable.

Alex,

I'm sorry you hold the views of neo-confederates and that people pointing out what a racist dung-for-brains tosser you are offends you.

I hope you accept my sincere apology, or else you a slightly bigger ass than we all previously thought.