Hopefully the hand histories at Party are presented in a way that's similar to the way they show up in PokerTracker, and not like it is in the Bovada client. There you aren't able to see the hands in list form, or sort them by category - and each hand history takes time to load up, and is three pages long.

winner!

This! The day online poker jumped the shark so to speak was the day limit poker allowed 8 tabling. The games went from tough but beatable at 2/4 limit to near dead. No limit was sustainable because a fish can give his whole buy in with top pair or worse, but limit was doomed with over fishing.

Au contraire you will be making more per table. Depending on what you define as a living but you might be able to make a living at stakes that were profitable for low paying jobs in Western countries ie 50NL now. The over saturation of multi-tablers has ruined these stakes.

Since when does any poker site owe you a living anyway?

Lmao. Without hud everyone will play perfect gto and poker will go away

All I see is gto on bavada. No money on bovada everyone's solid.

Yes back when the games played closer to live poker. It was quite common to see an obvious fish/whale sitting on multiple stacks playing awful poker getting paid off by the regs or better for the game getting action from fellow fish/whales.

Strap on your hard hat and learn how to beat lags. Because that's who will go on heaters.

Exactly. People like TR7 think poker is all about them. Every post of his reeks of entitlement. "My skill set" bla bla like playing poker for a barely liveable winrate is something to be proud of

Okish move but you should of killed the clones.

lol

w00t w00t!!!

+1

Okay -- if you want to provide a fair and ethical environment, why don't you pay people back for all they lost out on due to bots/collusion?

Instead of banning huds, sites should incorporate a free one for all players that can be switched on and off at a players convenience.

what bots?

Great news...



This message is hidden because bumpnrun is on your ignore list.

If his skill set includes the ability to write his own HUD then his sense of entitlement is well placed. He holds title over which property he alone chooses to possess or not, on terms drawn only by the limits of his own ingenuity.

Playing online poker for any win rate is a test of merit and is as much a legitimate source of pride, if you're predisposed to that sort of thing.

Champion of nano stakes, TR7 dropping wisdom lol.

he could be a panty wasted son of a millionaire who thinks hes amarillo slim or something like that

Why is this misleading and incorrect topic title allowed to remain in place?

Some absolute gold itt. Thanks guys. Just waiting for some of these software professionals to declare that they will be taking party to court for loss of earnings.

It's funny that so many people itt have no concept of how huds work. Ansky made a brilliant post about it some time ago (can't find it, if someone can pls post it). Basically, huds are used primarily for 2 purposes- off table work and in reg-on-reg wars. Using huds effectively against recreational players is very hard and often pointless because of several reasons. Sample size vs recs is usually too small to say anything meaningful about postflop, recs play based on table dynamics/their mood much more than poker theory (so it's way harder to interpret stats), many recs believe in things like lucky hands etc.

All these mean that banning huds would limit players' ability to work on their game and would also drastically limit number of reg battle (since edges shrink) and make some formats like zoom close to unplayable, while making close to no difference to recreational players. Anyone believing that they're losing now cause of huds but would come back and start winning if huds are banned is simply delusional.

Holdemindicator doesn't work on Unibet.