Quote:
Originally Posted by 12bigworm81
Smarten up.
Gosh, I'll try, dad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12bigworm81
You’re analyzing articles and charts of something pre crisis.
As was the poster you originally replied to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12bigworm81
There is no shortage of funding to deploy as many resources as possible to fight this virus. Period.
There certainly shouldn't be, and I don't think anyone would disagree with that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12bigworm81
The slow response in the US is simply our laws. In China they can approve tests, treatments and vaccines without any restrictions. In the US you need to have trials and proof they actually work.
The short response would be to lessen the approval standards for a crisis. However where do you draw the line with regards to loosening government regulations? In China they analyze the phone records of everyone infected and quarantine everyone that person could have encountered.
OK, I'm no expert on this, but I wouldn't expect the lag in testing would be due to laws. Treatments and vaccines, sure. We would have similar regimes up here, and I haven't heard of any issues with testing. In our province of 5 million, our Premier claimed last week that we had tested more people than the entire United States had to that point - apparently 1,012 here vs. 459 as of Feb. 27th. That number blew me away - 459??
Whether the US being slow off the mark with testing is a funding issue or not, I couldn't say. But I find it highly doubtful that it's attributable to laws alone, if at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12bigworm81
But back to my original point. You are an abject moron to argue CDC won’t be given additional resources based on budget cuts or charts from previous periods.
Cool. Unless I missed something, I think this is a straw man.