Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
Of course we need to take 'trans ideology' out of quotes and disambiguate its meaning. If we take the wiki definition of ideology for example I think maybe it would be hard to argue that there isn't a significant push to teach kids 'trans ideology':
I don't know who "we" is supposed to be or why you think you should be the one to speak for said group (something very common to your posts), but I'm good with the quotes there, thanks. And it's quite simple to argue that there isn't a significant push to teach kids 'trans ideology' in Canadian schools - I've been doing it for the last few posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
More specifically the idea that you should spend time questioning your own gender, that its moral and respectful to participate in others pronoun games, and that this ideology should define and shape the law. I would call that trans ideology and suggest that there is a growing push to teach this in schools (although who is pushing it and what is growing I think we could define further)
I would suggest you likely don't have a ****ing clue what is being taught WRT this issue in Canadian schools. I don't mean what you've been told is being taught, but what actually is. But if you have some knowledge and/or examples to prove me wrong, please feel free to share.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
Some peoples mental health has suffered in regard to the intellectual isolation and gaslighting they are faced with I think, and there are people that claimed they were following the science whilst chastising those that were simply calling for common sense. I think the latter have the significant mental health issue and they are generally going to be those pushing also for trans ideology education in public school (or not pushing back against it in the name of science and knowledge based education).
See above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
We should also take 'grooming' out from quotations. Those most actively in favor of trans ideology based education absolutely mean to condition children as young as possible with this ideology. That's grooming by a certain definition of it and doesn't really need quotes.
No, I put grooming in quotes for a very good reason. This "grooming" kids in schools nonsense is just that - nonsense. Again, see above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
On twitter however, there was the connotation you need to allude to it when you mean to point out grooming. This was because even reporting of obvious child abuse would get you flagged by the state corrupt moderation on twitter. It wasn't 'grooming' it was actual grooming and there was terrible **** being upheld by those ****s
No idea what you're on about here.
Again, if you have some kind of knowledge of what's actually being taught in Canadian schools, please feel free to share. I think I have a pretty good handle on what's happening in our province, but I don't claim the same for every province.
Last edited by Bobo Fett; 07-25-2023 at 05:11 AM.