Please change the structure too, start 10/20 with more deep play to start you can ditch the weird levels too no more 20/40, 40/80

I hope Party realizes that they are the only site running a significant number of SNGs for a reason. Any more than one type likely would cause a reduction in total number of games that go. The flat payout structure is also what keeps the games juicy.

If you think a change in payouts from 60/40 to 70/30 would greatly reduce the volume of games running you are wrong. Also during promo months like this one wsop has more sng traffic. Party should look into having a leaderboard.

Coming from a player who will be black card elite by the end of the month i hope this gets looked at. When kicked from a table for inactivity you are suspended from sitting back at that table for 10 mins. I literally got up to go to the bath room i come back my seat was still open so i just missed it. I go to sit down 10 min wait. This is atrocious. Either increase the wait time or decrease the suspension to 2 mins or something more realistic. Also wait lists as stated before :P.

Coming from a player who will be Red Label for life, I agree. If you're timed out on a short handed table you can't get back on for 10 minutes. This is clear cut discrimination against the elderly with weak urine streams and I plan to start a class action suit if the situation isn't remedied.

get a nice big wide mouthed bottle imo, at least i need a wide mouth - :-)

That's cool how you state an opinion like a fact with nothing to back it up.

I check WSOP volume almost everyday and even during the promotion it tends to be on par with Party. Rarely does WSOP significantly exceed Party volume despite the fact that there are 3-4 regulars at some tables when leaderboard is running. Without the leaderboard, WSOP is often a ghost town.

If you adjust all the games I have played to this point to the 70/30 structure I would have made an additional $3467.10 playing the WRONG structure. If I had been playing a style to maximize 70/30 I would have taken even more money from the SNG economy and I am only one person. So obviously since it benefits me I would be all for a 70/30 structure if we had excess liquidity, but we can't spare any. SNGs are on continually on the brink, I can't remember the last $200 I played and many a night goes by without even a $100 going off.

A permanent leaderboard for Party would go a long way to shoring things up. Also reducing the rake at $50+ SNGs would help some of the $20 winners to move up.

One thing i miss from Full Tilt and PS are SnGs 18,27, and 45 man. My recommendation would be to see what stakes your single table sngs are ran the most at and offer a 18 or 27 MTT in those buyins. Thank you

Maybe someday if we get some more states in the pool but it is not an option now. $20 level is probably the most popular (or close to it) and it often takes 15 minutes or more for a 6-man $20 SNG to fill even during peak times.

This is how to get them to fill up without the waiting. Yes they won't be guaranteed, but they need to be scheduled and CAPPED as if they were a 1,2 or 3 table S&G.

So you can have do the same thing with no facts? lol Obviously we are both opinions having no access to data showing the effect of a payout. But I am of the opinion it will have little impact on the number of games running.

Beyond the payout I really do feel the structure needs to be fixed. It creates a terrible game flow jumping from 40 bb stacks to start.

And to add to your point about liquidity, yea clearly a leaderboard would be beneficial to everyone, and I'm quite certain as has occurred on wsop, the extra rake generated from having a leaderboard more than covers the amount of money they are giving away for the promotion. The fact that wsop is a ghost town when there is no leaderboard shows you the effect a leaderboard can have.

The only fact we have is that many more SNGs run on Party with their payout/structure than run on WSOP despite similar numbers of players on both sites. So, I am not sure how changing the payout and structure to be more like WSOP could possibly be beneficial to liquidity.

I wont play sngs cause of the 60/40 and awful rake structure. I know youve played the most jph but it doesnt make sense to me that 60/40 is the better payout amount.

I don't think that it is 'better'. I hate having to be on constant lookout for collusion. I am former HU player so I would love for there to be a bigger benefit to winning. Fact is the site has 150 average active cash players and yet has a fairly healthy SNG economy. I am not sure, but I don't think you will find another network out there with those stats.

If you think more people play sngs on party than wsop because of the structure, it clearly is not the reason

It looks like the WSOP leaderboard and dwindling numbers have killed off Party SNGs, sucks that the two sites don't have the same payouts to allow for playing across both sites.

How about party tries to make a better customer service process. Sorry for the rant, but I have funds locked up for almost a week. Which is not right. I doubt party even seen any of my posts\thread here.

I assume you already did but have you tried calling them?

Party rep: Played a "Stage III" satellite on Sunday 5/11 (paid out 10 $100 tickets) - once we reached 11 players (or 12 as Party typically does it) the tournament did NOT go hand for hand and pretty much everyone at both tables time banked every single hand for about 20 minutes. Don't know if this has since been corrected or was an isolated incident but either way it's a silly mistake that should be corrected.

I have a couple of suggestions. So the first i will be a black card elite holder by the end of the month. We should at least be offering black card status at brick and mortor location. WSOP has this for their brick and mortor status we should be treated the same especially because you are suppose to be the leader of the market atm. If i pay borgata casino $8,000 in rake this year so far i should get the respect i deserve.

The 2nd is i personally feel the shopping store is pretty bad. The xbox one and PS4 have been out for a while now the xbox 360 and ps3 are outdated along with the accessories. Most of the stuff is becoming outdated. I would suggest hiring a marketing team i dont mind saving my points to buy cool things. As it currently stands i would not buy anything besides the bonus tickets for RB. I want to at least want to buy a Hooded sweat shirt. If i pay $8,000 in rake since February i at least want to be proud of the site i play for.

To add another suggestion it would be awesome if RB could be comparable to other sites in NJ and paid in the form of money once per week not bonuses that have to be claimed. I dont really expect borgata to change their stance on the RB but the above two suggestions need to be implemented.

Agreed 100%. More or less the sole reason I play on WSOP instead of Borgata/Party is because the money earned from their VIP program is paid instantly and I can work a bonus at the same time. On Borgata you have to either take comps or take a bonus to get decent value which blows. The other reason I play at WSOP is because they match certain online tiers to their brick and mortar tiers. Just doesn't make sense to play on Party really.

waiting list on cash table if possible

Any chance for a "fastforward" style MTT? Or at least a multi-table SNG any time soon?

Deepstack ante cash games please!!!

We can't even get fast fold and full ring going lol