Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year !!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year

03-02-2017 , 04:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
lolwil

$200 to 5ive please, and clean up your act, paedo-lover.
Nah, he pays it to you and then you ship me half. You keep half for poking the spew-bear.

p.s. Also, there are a bunch more. I stopped before he even got into the homosexuality aspect.
03-02-2017 , 04:48 AM
I don't even have a Paypal. Paypal is the ****ing devil.
03-02-2017 , 05:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I'm not PayPal'ing $200 to 5ive, ever.

**** you.
Ok. I'm in transit to Italy now but will PM you my PayPal account when I'm back, or before if I can remember it.
03-02-2017 , 07:53 AM
It's like you can advocate for dumb stupid Republican policies for years, but you advocate for adult-child sexual relations JUST ONE TIME and everybody remembers you as that guy that advocates for adult-child sexual relations for pretty much the rest of your life.
03-02-2017 , 08:22 AM
Wil is in a weird place where he thinks it's good for the underage guy, but probably doesn't think the adult should have done it. Society in general struggles with this as well. Watch the Hot for Teacher video. Read news clippings from the 80s about female teachers just getting reprimanded. It used to be not only acceptable, but heroic on the part of the male student.

Eventually, they need to come to the realization that rape is rape.
03-02-2017 , 08:32 AM
Wil is in super ultra double think mode.
03-02-2017 , 08:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
p.s. I sometimes forget how weird and abstract the topic of sexuality can be. A sexual experience can be horrible abuse or pleasurable good times, and few other things fit this paradigm.
Complicating things further is this (very understandable) false dichotomy, often leading to further confusion and disorientation for victims. Sometimes a rape can be physically pleasant at times AND be horribly abusive.
03-02-2017 , 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
It's like you can advocate for dumb stupid Republican policies for years, but you advocate for adult-child sexual relations JUST ONE TIME and everybody remembers you as that guy that advocates for adult-child sexual relations for pretty much the rest of your life.
I think we all remember wil for his LG prop bet meltdown. Or else for the Serena Williams thing.
03-02-2017 , 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Ok. I'm in transit to Italy now but will PM you my PayPal account when I'm back, or before if I can remember it.
Don't bother, you didn't win the bet.
03-02-2017 , 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
You condone adults having sex with under age children.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
How about I simply PayPal you 200 dollars for quoting me saying this?

I'll be waiting, I'll ship the money when you prove I said that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Don't bother, you didn't win the bet.
I have to say, i think he did win the bet. You seem to think that advocating for underage boys to have sex with adults is not the same as condoning adults having sex with underage children? You can't have one without the other.
03-02-2017 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Peter
I have to say, i think he did win the bet. You seem to think that advocating for underage boys to have sex with adults is not the same as condoning adults having sex with underage children? You can't have one without the other.
Nah.

Chez deleted my posts. 5ive is quoting only the posts that try to defend his side. Normal dishonesty and lies from the idiots on this site.
03-02-2017 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Peter
I have to say, i think he did win the bet. You seem to think that advocating for underage boys to have sex with adults is not the same as condoning adults having sex with underage children? You can't have one without the other.
Ahh. Found it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
The transcript you are quoting is different from the video. It's obvious that Milo actually enjoyed his sexual escapades with older men while he was a teen, as he refused to refer to it in a negative manner. I think many men could picture a similar position if we were talking about heterosexual relationships when we were of similar age. I know I would not be talking of it negatively if I was 14 and had sex with a 25 year old woman twenty years after the fact. I'd have jumped at the chance.

As far as him describing what he feels is appropriate, I disagree. That being said, he's taking a very personal view on the subject in regards to his experiences, which he obviously enjoyed when he was in that position. I don't support his stance.
03-02-2017 , 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
Let's forget for a second the discussion about what an incomprehensibly awful poster Wil is.

In a general sense, the bolded might be the dumbest sentence ever written. Your world is one where fathers can't be pedophiles?
You're right, that was a stupid comment. It was based on my own experience, and not reflective of reality.
03-02-2017 , 08:48 PM
Well, sir, it's nice that you corrected it. Obviously, only an infinitesimal percentage of fathers are pedophiles. But I would imagine mathematically that if a child of single-digit age is sexually assaulted, molested, or groped, the most likely culprit is their father.
03-02-2017 , 08:55 PM
Not at all obvious that an infinitesimal percentage of fathers are pedophiles. Not even sure that from a Bayesian perspective being a father makes one less likely to be a pedophile.
03-02-2017 , 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Complicating things further is this (very understandable) false dichotomy, often leading to further confusion and disorientation for victims. Sometimes a rape can be physically pleasant at times AND be horribly abusive.
Wait, wasn't that implied? Well it was meant to be, my mistake. Regardless, thanks for clarifying.
03-02-2017 , 09:04 PM
Ahaha what "side" am I "defending"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Nah.

Chez deleted my posts. 5ive is quoting only the posts that try to defend his side. Normal dishonesty and lies from the idiots on this site.
03-02-2017 , 09:21 PM
I actually used wil's 'eureka' post in my list. I took that bit into account.


Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Ahh. Found it.
03-03-2017 , 12:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
I think we all remember wil for his LG prop bet meltdown. Or else for the Serena Williams thing.
Wait, what's the Serena Williams thing?
03-03-2017 , 12:46 AM
Is commentary necessary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
No. I'm saying I don't shy away from topics that are complicated.

I don't judge how gay men decide to live their lives, mostly. In this instance it is slightly more complicated due to the nature of human sexuality. There are only 3 (traditional) possible scenarios here. Male / female, female / female, and male / male relationships. In 2 out of three of those scenarios the limiting factor are the females when it comes to sex, in very general terms.

This is why gay males have such an abnormal amount of sex compared to the other two scenarios. While nothing is absolute the number of sexual partners for gay males is astronomical. There simply is no equivalent of "book store cruising" or the accepted group sex of gay males. I'm a heterosexual male and the idea is completely foreign to me. When it was explained, it made sense. The promiscuity of gay males is, in general, off the charts.

Again, I'm not here to judge how other people live their lives. They can be gay in whatever manner they choose to be gay. I don't really include pedophilia in that category, as I think there is too much room in hurting underage people. That being said, I recognize that the situation may actually be slightly different in this circumstance due to the nature of the differences between males and females.

I do not know how to define it in a universal way, just as i don't with many topics. To simplify that as saying I condone pedophilia is idiocy.
03-03-2017 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayo
Wait, what's the Serena Williams thing?
Oh my.


http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/41...ighlight=scorn
03-03-2017 , 01:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
ME: How bad can it be? Some dumb opinion on Serena Williams. Nothing I haven't seen befo-

WIL:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
You mean the Serena Williams who had her half-sister killed by Crip gang members in Compton, and then was widely criticized for doing the Crip walk at the Olympics? That Serena Williams? Because, we all know the Crip walk is just so "Palm Beach".
ME: Oh.
03-03-2017 , 03:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayo
Wait, what's the Serena Williams thing?
It was a time where fly was absolutely desperate in telling other white people how they should feel about black people.

It was hilarious.
03-03-2017 , 04:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Don't bother, you didn't win the bet.
I'm surprised by the line you've taken.

Saying that 13 year olds love being victims of paedophilia isn't defending paedophilia?

Just pay up and stop welching on bets ffs. No one cares about the actual money but the principle. Here's your chance to say you can make that sum in the time it takes to XYZ.
03-03-2017 , 04:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
I'm surprised by the line you've taken.

Saying that 13 year olds love being victims of paedophilia isn't defending paedophilia?

Just pay up and stop welching on bets ffs. No one cares about the actual money but the principle. Here's your chance to say you can make that sum in the time it takes to XYZ.
Only if they're boys, gay or straight or ____. Which isn't condoning pedophilia because ____.

      
m