Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year !!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year

03-03-2017 , 03:38 PM
Wait, after Wil calling me "despicable, dishonest and scummy" he reported me for calling him a liar who couldn't back those claims up?

It's ok buddy, the weekend is almost here.
edit:I guess it was a third party who just saw Wil flailing and wanted to give him a life line into not being a lying coward?

Still waiting on *any* evidence of me being scummy or the claim about Juan!

Btw Sushy, nice ninja delete! Really on the ball today good sir, don't worry I saw your post.

Last edited by aoFrantic; 03-03-2017 at 03:44 PM.
03-03-2017 , 03:52 PM
Frantic.

Any luck with a date yet after Juan turned you down?
03-03-2017 , 04:11 PM
Broadway, I have a very nice place with my gf. I'm also over 40 years younger than you. You have what, 3 maybe 4 elections to vote fascism in left in you?
03-03-2017 , 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic

Here's a list of my three most embarrassing 2p2 positions:
Thinking Chamakh would be a good CF
Thinking Miyaichi would make it at Arsenal
Thinking Arsenal could win a title post 2010 with Wenger
Erm... Arsenal happen to be my local club (I've attended blood-donor sessions at the Emirates because it's within walking distance), and they've won the FA Cup, the most historic tournament in football, twice since 2010.
03-03-2017 , 04:12 PM
League title, sorry.
03-03-2017 , 04:13 PM
Does she know you sexually harass men on the internets?
03-03-2017 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
You're just scummy. I don't see why I have to explain myself or try to convince you of it. I really just don't want anything to do with you, I wish you'd stop being so infatuated with me. It's bad enough you sexually harass Juan, don't start targetting me now.

And soccer ****ing blows. Get a real sport. Loser.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Does she know you sexually harass men on the internets?
Wil, ladies and gentleman!

Last edited by aoFrantic; 03-03-2017 at 04:17 PM. Reason: I only count four cases of irony in these two posts, anyone else?
03-03-2017 , 04:18 PM
AFC have been my club too since Charlie George's double wining goal I watched as an entranced kid .
03-03-2017 , 04:48 PM
Happy days.
03-03-2017 , 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by auralex14
Certainly another reason. However, that argument can be applied across the entire legal system.
True, but if you're dead, then you can't be freed after the fact.
03-03-2017 , 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Reminder: This is a !!! thread so please don't report personal attacks - they are allowed.
Why not just have a sub-forum for those threads?

Oh wait, that was what this forum was supposed to be.
03-03-2017 , 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
It'd obviously a chance to punch down. Not the nicest thing, but w/e.
Wil is living a very American Dreamish life.

If he wasn't there's no way I'd be this harsh with him.

I wouldn't even bother with this latest bet if I knew he couldn't easily afford it.
03-03-2017 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
This is classic Wil, has all his trademarks. Begins with a bit of concern trolling about how he's a liberal, honest guv', then goes into a half baked superficial wilnalysis of the world based on anecdotes about friends, then he tries to dial it back a lot, then the threatened Wil puffs out his cheeks and goes into fight mode spewing about black tennis players. It's his pattern.
What makes that thread so fascinating is that it seems to be the birth of the whole business you describe. Chronologically, at least.
03-03-2017 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Broadway, I have a very nice place with my gf. I'm also over 40 years younger than you. You have what, 3 maybe 4 elections to vote fascism in left in you?
03-03-2017 , 09:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Reminder: This is a !!! thread so please don't report personal attacks - they are allowed.
lol at the huge pussy who reported posts itt.
03-07-2017 , 04:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
when i was thirteen i wanted to have sex with any woman who had reached puberty and thought was attractive.
Absolute the same from me. When I was 13-14, any developed female who I found sexually attractive (be she 13-14 herself or 34) I would have definitely done it with her and been super enthusiastic if not downright giddy about it.

Assuming it had been a 34 year old, my eagerness would not have meant she wasn't doing anything wrong or wasn't taking advantage of me.

I think the fact people know how insanely horny teenage boys are is one of the major reasons older women get so much lighter sentences when they screw around with teenage boys. People assume (probably correct) she didn't have to coerce very hard.

And this isn't "defending" pedophilia. As I said earlier, you can't get into this case by case basis crap because people would take advantage of it. You need to have black and white rules about what fully mature adults can and cannot do with the not yet fully mature because of the clear vulnerability of those not fully developed individuals.

That's the whole essence of statutory rape to begin with, someone can give their "consent" but unless they are at a point where they fully grasp everything that's going on, that consent is invalid. I'm just pointing I def. would have been on the giving my invalid consent side of things.

Last edited by Cotton Hill; 03-07-2017 at 05:02 AM.
03-07-2017 , 04:57 AM
No. Women and men are the same, and if you wanted to have sex with a female 4 years older than you kerowo, jalfrezi and aofrantic will call you a pedophile. Which is ******ed.
03-07-2017 , 06:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotton Hill
Absolute the same from me. When I was 13-14, any developed female who I found sexually attractive (be she 13-14 herself or 34) I would have definitely done it with her and been super enthusiastic if not downright giddy about it.

Assuming it had been a 34 year old, my eagerness would not have meant she wasn't doing anything wrong or wasn't taking advantage of me.

I think the fact people know how insanely horny teenage boys are is one of the major reasons older women get so much lighter sentences when they screw around with teenage boys. People assume (probably correct) she didn't have to coerce very hard.

And this isn't "defending" pedophilia. As I said earlier, you can't get into this case by case basis crap because people would take advantage of it. You need to have black and white rules about what fully mature adults can and cannot do with the not yet fully mature because of the clear vulnerability of those not fully developed individuals.

That's the whole essence of statutory rape to begin with, someone can give their "consent" but unless they are at a point where they fully grasp everything that's going on, that consent is invalid. I'm just pointing I def. would have been on the giving my invalid consent side of things.
Other than young boys being horny, do you have evidence that adults molesting them leads to nothing more than giggles and good times? And no, I don't mean anecdotes.
03-07-2017 , 09:50 AM
I was never a teenage girl, but the implicit assumption that teenage girls (or younger) don't have sexual feelings towards men seems like a flawed one.

Otherwise, what I said before applies that assuming your adolescent fantasy about an older woman is exactly how it would've played out in reality is pretty ****ing naive.
03-07-2017 , 10:03 AM
Who's this guy? I've seen him around but can't connect a name to his face. Also annoying that you get a gif for thumb but you cant open the post directly.
03-07-2017 , 07:01 PM
Bleh. I miss Milo. He made me laugh.
03-07-2017 , 07:23 PM
Shocking.
03-07-2017 , 07:59 PM
You make me laugh too. I'll take the gay Jewish guy though. No offense.
03-07-2017 , 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
I was never a teenage girl, but the implicit assumption that teenage girls (or younger) don't have sexual feelings towards men seems like a flawed one.

Otherwise, what I said before applies that assuming your adolescent fantasy about an older woman is exactly how it would've played out in reality is pretty ****ing naive.
I don't think anyone is saying teenage girls don't have sexual thoughts and desires, but we are talking on average here. The average teenage boy is probably the peak of human horniess. Were we not all teenage boys once? I know I can't have been the only one jacking it like 2-3 times a day and watching the scrambled porno channels late at night before the intertubes.

And you're 100% right that such a possible hypothetical incident with an older woman might have turned out to be very traumatic both during and after. That would totally be up to the individual and the circumstances. It's also why kids giving their 'consent' is an impossible situation to navigate, because I'm sure a ton of them do indeed later feel abused by things they supposedly consented to.
03-08-2017 , 02:41 AM
Or talked into feeling like they were abused.

There's a strange phenomenon going on where people are taught to look back and if they didn't have memories of perfect relationships or situations it should be viewed as abuse and how they "didn't deserve" what they went through. Granted, in some cases that's true but in many cases it's just life. I remember reading a thread somewhere where a college aged girl was describing living in an awfully abusive household, her mom yelling at her and maybe smacking her a few times growing up, and also getting into fights with her siblings as they grew up together. Now, I'm unsure how to define what is actually abuse here but I was pretty amazed that this person felt as if they went though the most awful experience ever and I just felt like she probably went through a pretty normal childhood.

It's extremely hard to define here because without more information it's hard to make a good argument but it amazes me how fragile people are anymore. No wonder everyone needs therapy.

I think it's a total failure of parenting.

      
m