If you don't care about Team Age Appropriate Reading Grade Level and their awful awful "lies"* about Bruce and about conservatives and about everything....

Why don't you go back to your little playpen with your moron loser friends where you can sit around saying whatever the **** you want without fear of MrWookie's eye of judgment?


*FoldN thinks that direct quotes are "dishonest", which may explain why he provides them so rarely

These fools are going to literally drop dead of old age before they get over a racist being called a mean name on the interwebs

Lol what eye of judgement? How many temp bans or deleted posts has team SMP gotten in their thousands of posts about nothing? Compare that to what would happen in SMP with any Bruce is racist posts.

Somehow though, politics regs are the real issue with race relations because something something shut down team Bruce despite the fact these ****ers never ever STFU about it

The issue is what you read into them. For example, in terms of searches the cops search blacks at a higher rate than whites, even though the respective contraband hit rates are similar. From that, you conclude racist pigs. Fine. But they also search men at a higher rate than women, even though the hit rates are similar. They also search younger motorists at a higher rate than older ones, even though the hit rates are similar. I think they’re just profiling based on their job experience, as opposed to any animus, subconscious or not, based on race, gender or age.

Sorry foldn, this doesn't mean dick. Responding to someone who says something dumb/racist with something equally racist doesn't invalidate your statement. It just means two racists were having a conversation

If the hit rates are similar (and they're not, they're actually lower for blacks), why on earth would a fair-minded cop's on-the-job experience tell him to search blacks more when they find just as much contraband on whites?

They’re not searching just because of suspicion. They’re doing “crime prevention” or what they’re now calling “goal-oriented policing,” i.e. over-policing. So because they fit the criminal profile the cops are exposed to, they’re profiled for searches more. For example, with Oakland PD last year 8228 robbery suspects are black compared to 107 white. So who do you think they’ll end up searching at a higher rate, older white women or young black males?

So, cops search more blacks because they search more blacks? Why am I not allowed to call this racist?

The part you bolded was fine, imo.

The other part where he seems to assume that oppressed minorities are either stupid or are subhuman recording machines is a little bit odd.

amazing absolutely ****ing amazing

welcome to team bruce

Haha this is a constructive and honest conversation on race, courtesy of SMP. We're all so lucky that 5 or so terrible posters all independently expanded their posting from that forum to this forum at around the same time.

Did you happen, good sir, to keep reading the thread? Because boy does this comment make you look ****ing stupid. I mean, all of your posts do that, but this one in particular, as you furiously defend Bruce saying that the (black) witnesses in Ferguson are likely to be racist against white people.

Oh I decided to check FoldN's story out, that "Bruce was just throwing it back" defense? I was so overcome with hilarity at how dumb that defense was I forgot the first rule of SMP is "Never have any ****ing idea what you're talking about". FoldN you know, that thing where you and your idiot colleagues just make **** up is unusual, right? Just because you got away with that **** in your shortbus forum doesn't mean it will fly anywhere else.

BruceZ didn't quote anyone, but the witnesses are likely to be racist post came shortly after a prior post of his. There were, in fact, only 3 posts in between. One of which was, incredibly:
One of which was DS making a tangential point. The actual post BruceZ was responding to, the thing that FoldN described as
is quoted, in its entirety, below
(emphasis mine)
It is funny how conversations works, FoldN.

Again, Duffee, why do you get aggravated when your viewpoint is described as "the Ferguson and Oakland PDs search more black people because black people are more criminal" when that is your viewpoint?

Also, why are you hung up on this thing where every individual police officer has to burn crosses in order for a department to act in a racist manner. What you describe is, in fact, a police department acting racist and we can take steps to try and remedy that.

Also, Duffee, how many white men where arrested for resisting arrest in Ferguson? Or had dogs set on them? What was the ratio of traffic tickets fixed for black people vs white people? Why were black people charged differently and treated differently for similar violation? Why in a culture where racists emails drew no rebuke from superiors would out default assumption be blacks were treated equally to whites? How many white men were shot dead by police in Oakland and Ferguson recently?

To go back to your earlier point that you didn't elaborate on, who is more subject to police oppression a black citizen or a newly naturalized white citizen?

Feel free to address any and all points instead of just bleating baaaaahhhhhhhh I don't like people criticizing me.

Nice job Fly, I was wrong. Either that or I was thinking of another conversation where he made a similar statement. Still, I'm having trouble understanding how calling people racist is racist. If so, you have a lot of explaining to do.

Anyway, from the same thread:

Lack of empathy and ignorance is one of problems I see this area and throughout the country, and it's what I see in Bruce on this issue. You call that racist. I don't think it is, but it is something that I hope continues to change.

Try to keep up dumbass. People in a minority group who are discriminated against are capable of noticing that they are being discriminated against.

The alternative is that you think they are too stupid to notice.

Remember when BruceZ threatened to dox pvn? That was some crazy ****, yo.

When controversial topics like race are discussed openly and academically, there will always be guys like this:



I guess it doesn't make much difference in the long run as long as those discussions don't stop happening.

Hahahahahah. Your reading comprehension sucks, bro.

lolz


Keep on ****ing that chicken.

does SMP stand for stupid mouthbreathing people?

LOL so have you read the DOJ report on the shooting death of Brown?

There are 6 other witnesses who corroborate Wilson's testimony and 0 witnesses whose testimony is consistent with prior statements and the physical evidence who inculpate Wilson.

The Prosecutor did not need this witness.

I guess we all now know with certainty that you are an ******* and a completely insensitive dick with respect to how you view developmentally delayed people given the use of the "short bus" reference above. Interesting how someone who likes to label people bigots and racists all the time would express such a low opinion of people simply because they have a disability.

it's not just that the SMP crew is developmentally disabled, it's that they also try to assert their intellectual superiority when it comes to rational debate. given the performance itt, you cant blame a man for being somewhat indignant.

Did you mean to quote Fly when he said that I am defending Bruce?

I am not expecting to learn much new here from the general assembly of yahoos, so I am doing some skimming instead of trying to find the deep kernel of knowledge that I already know I am not going to find.

Black people in Ferguson should be biased against the cops there. The cops are, in fact, really out to get them. It has nothing to do with the black people being racist and it would be quite odd if the black people in Ferguson weren't affected by knowing that the cops are out to get them.

I think it is possible to be indignant without being derogatory to a group of disabled people in a very insensitive way. Wouldn't you agree?