Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Air Grievances about BruceZ Getting Called Racist ITT: New Posts Arriving All the Time! Air Grievances about BruceZ Getting Called Racist ITT: New Posts Arriving All the Time!

04-08-2015 , 06:05 PM
So basically police abuse is just a fiction invented by people who are biased against police because of abusive police practices.
04-08-2015 , 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
So basically police abuse is just a fiction invented by people who are biased against police because of abusive police practices.
No police abuse is very real.

Sent from my XT1021 using 2+2 Forums
04-08-2015 , 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
You ever find a post where someone accused you of dogwhistling?
You're smart to change the subject, but this is a silly one.

No, I don't care to wade through the mess, but lol at challenging me on being accused of using code words and dog whistles. Do you not know where you are today? I'll happily make a bet with you.
04-08-2015 , 06:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
So basically police abuse is just a fiction invented by people who are biased against police because of abusive police practices.
Yeah that's a weird statement. It's really simple: people who distrust police will more likely be biased against police. People who trust police will more likely be biased in favor of police. Any disagreement on this?
04-08-2015 , 06:32 PM
Rule one of team Bruce: never actually produce a Bruce post in support of any argument.
04-08-2015 , 06:33 PM
Those are ****ing tautologies, FoldN, just spit out the ****ing point
04-08-2015 , 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Rule one of team Bruce: never actually produce a Bruce post in support of any argument.
That's really more like Rule 1(a), since Rule 1 is never produce any examples of anything, ever, but incredibly still maintain an indignant and smug tone as if the lack of evidence is all the proof you need.

Anyway, I think I found FoldN's mom:
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/1...ampaign=buffer
Quote:
One of the racist emails sent by Twitty included a picture of Ronald Reagan feeding a chimpanzee, along with the caption: “Rare photo of Ronald Reagan babysitting Barack Obama in 1962.”

Asked by KMOV whether she found the emails funny, she replied, "Funny as in, humor-wise? Humor-wise, yes. Not because it was racist or biased, no. Just funny joke-wise. I feel bad because that's not, I don't want people to look at me and say, ‘Well, she sent those racist jokes out because she's racist or biased.' And I'm not.”
04-08-2015 , 06:37 PM
I don't get it. She says she's not racist, ergo we should take her at her word. /chezlaw
04-08-2015 , 06:39 PM
Just another victim of those damn PC liberals playing the race card.
04-08-2015 , 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Yeah that's a weird statement. It's really simple: people who distrust police will more likely be biased against police. People who trust police will more likely be biased in favor of police. Any disagreement on this?
and the privileged group (in this case whites) will tend to be biased towards the police being fair.

all in all the reason to be very way about witness statements except where they collaborate particular events.
04-08-2015 , 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Rule one of team Bruce: never actually produce a Bruce post in support of any argument.
Lol, what post am I supposed to produce? Wookie is the one who made the accusation. The burden is on him to back it up. He should post where Bruce said whites are less biased than blacks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Those are ****ing tautologies, FoldN, just spit out the ****ing point
Practically yes, which is why this so simple. Do you disagree most of the witnesses in Ferguson were likely to distrust police?

Last edited by FoldnDark; 04-08-2015 at 07:02 PM.
04-08-2015 , 07:15 PM
I'll go ahead and answer that for you, of course you don't. Anyone who's been paying attention sees this. So if you agree they likely distrust the police, then you agree they are likely to be biased against the police. You and Bruce agree. Glad to help.
04-08-2015 , 07:21 PM
so because they've been systematically brutalized and discriminated against by police for years, we can't trust their statements about an event where police brutality occurred.

SMP4EVA
04-08-2015 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
so because they've been systematically brutalized and discriminated against by police for years, we can't trust their statements about an event where police brutality occurred.

SMP4EVA
And don't forget we should take the word of the (alleged) abusers without making any comment about their possible bias.
04-08-2015 , 07:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
so because they've been systematically brutalized and discriminated against by police for years, we can't trust their statements about an event where police brutality occurred.

SMP4EVA
You shouldn't blindly trust or mistrust any witnesses statements. You should evaluate them, comparing them to each other and to the physical evidence for consistency, and you should also understand which way each of their biases is likely to fall. That's how the full picture is best revealed. Any investigator worth his salt does this, it's not that complicated.
04-08-2015 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
And don't forget we should take the word of the (alleged) abusers without making any comment about their possible bias.
That would be very stupid. Please don't do that.
04-08-2015 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
You shouldn't blindly trust or mistrust any witnesses statements. You should evaluate them, comparing them to each other and to the physical evidence for consistency, and you should also understand which way each of their biases is likely to fall. That's how the full picture is best revealed. Any investigator worth his salt does this, it's not that complicated.
Good to hear you agree Bruce isn't worth any salt.
04-08-2015 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Good to hear you agree Bruce isn't worth any salt.
You don't add much flavor yourself, bud.
04-08-2015 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
That would be very stupid. Please don't do that.
And glad you agree Bruce was very stupid.
04-08-2015 , 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anais
Who's more likely to lie:

Someone who's biased, or someone who is on trial for murder?

Why would one be more likely to lie than the other?

(Hint: think self-preservation)
Well, minorities are more likely to be put on trial for most criminal offenses, and given harsher sentences than whites, so I guess the answer is black people are more likely to lie.
04-08-2015 , 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
all in all the reason to be very way about witness statements...
Ya, see like I said, this is the part where you conclude that reports of police violence are exaggerations/inventions of minorities, who are biased against police because of police violence. It's a neatly paradoxical bit of victim blaming.
04-08-2015 , 08:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
And glad you agree Bruce was very stupid.
I mean, you do realize that by this measure, practically the whole forum was stupid. But sure, vigorously arguing for or against either side was stupid and those who did so were acting stupidly.
04-08-2015 , 08:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Ya, see like I said, this is the part where you conclude that reports of police violence are exaggerations/inventions of minorities, who are biased against police because of police violence. It's a neatly paradoxical bit of victim blaming.
Not at all. The reports of police violence and misconduct are not remotely exaggerated.

I'm very sure they are downplayed. It's one of the reasons why cameras are so vital
04-08-2015 , 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
You shouldn't blindly trust or mistrust any witnesses statements. You should evaluate them, comparing them to each other and to the physical evidence for consistency, and you should also understand which way each of their biases is likely to fall. That's how the full picture is best revealed. Any investigator worth his salt does this, it's not that complicated.
oh wow, **** that my parents taught me when i was like 8 years old, you're adding so much value to the conversation with this crash course in developing good judgment, please go on.

how did you feel about the testimony of witness 40, officer wilson, and the construction workers? who do you think was the most reliable of the 3? you know, given your expertise in discerning bias and all that
04-08-2015 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Ya, see like I said, this is the part where you conclude that reports of police violence are exaggerations/inventions of minorities, who are biased against police because of police violence. It's a neatly paradoxical bit of victim blaming.
You mean this is the part where you make stuff up about what people said instead of just acknowledging they're right?

      
m