Quote:
Originally Posted by FGHT YR DMNS
2/4 should not be apart of the bad beat jackpot. IMO limit games should be excluded. Especially 2/4, they see just about every river. No ones folding a gutshot str8 flush draw on the turn with the board paired in limit, as opposed to no limit where the action can force a hand to fold. Does anyone agree? Those games have an edge when it comes to hitting it. And 2/5 players need a re-vote to be included. Bored havin a smoke thought I'd start some s**t
Disagree on both counts.
Roughly speaking, the odds of a limit table hitting a BBJ (assuming all 10 hands are played to river, every deal) are only (maybe) 10-20% better than at a NL table where hands are played more "normally" (if that's even true of 1/2). Given the rake at 2/4, those players need all the help they can get.
As far as 2/5 is concerned, my impression is that most of the reg's would prefer not to be raked for the BBJ in order to participate. I view this as paying an extra $2-3/hr in rake, which is several thousand $/year, for an involuntary lottery ticket, on which the payoff is highly unlikely and will be taxed at about 30% (after the house takes out 5%) anyway. (If it's such a great idea, why not do it at 5/10NL and above? No way.)
Now, if we could get the PLO games included in the same BBJ, I'd vote for that in a second....