If I play poorly and get in with 94% show me the content that says "You should lose every time with 94% equity because you play it badly earlier bettign round".

Show it or shut your mouth!

the content that sais youre playing your hands poor is your ev-line.

Paisting just shoves his stack when he has nothing.

What about the hands where you get it in bad, do you think you play those hands poorly?

He completely ignores any questions about his J3 shoves or anything like that. He just thinks he is so mistreated by multiple websites giving -EV situations the pots all of the time, but if this were actually the case he would probably up 100k instead of down over that much. He is a moron.

great play paisting . your results show how skilled you are!

You know you´re in a Paisting thread if villains puts in 100bb before the flop holding K4 and comes here to complain that he didn´t win that hand lol.

I love, love, love how every time time you try to plead your case, all you do is provide evidence against yourself.

There is no such thing as "should" or "shouldn't" in poker. Statistics doesn't care about what you perceive to be "fair", it doesn't care about "justice". It's just randomness. You lose with 94% equity exactly 6% of the time. That's it. If you happen to hit a 2 outer on the turn and go from 8% equity to 94% equity, it doesn't mean that you played well on the flop.

This seems to be your problem, you have some warped/twisted idea in your mind about what "should" happen in some "grand cosmic justice sense" or whatever and when these expectations aren't met, you go batshit crazy and tilt off an absurd amount of money with terrible plays like 3b shoving J5o 250bb deep vs a standard open raise. I haven't seen you acknowledge that these plays you make are bad. If you can't acknowledge them, you can't start improving.

OP's death threats in chat seem like a cry for help. He's in a troubling situation, and perhaps can't afford to lose four figures a month. I hope he gets the help he needs.

There are a couple things you get wrong:

• You believe getting it in as a favorite over a 1 hand sample means you played the hand well. It doesn't.
• Even if we apply above logic and say getting it in as a favorite means you played the hand well, you yourself have posted a losing EV graph. I'll write this in simple English for you: a losing EV graph means you get it in bad more often than good. Shocking, I know.

You write like someone whose EV line makes a huge difference, when it's literally the difference between -150bb/100 and -149bb/100. Quit playing, remove anything poker from your life, and tell a family member about your problems or call the Finnish gambling helpline: https://www.peluuri.fi/fi/peluurin-yhteystiedot

Paisting, I don’t know if you are aware or it’s been mentioned, but STARS has a cashout feature for 1 percent. You can never have to go thru a bad beat ever again - just cash out your equity every time the money goes in. I personally have it turned off but this could be the key to solving your problems! This feature could prob save you hundreds or thousands (?) a month.

Is your last name really Paisting like the guy wrote on reddit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Perhaps you could start off your daily grind as normal but as soon as you take your first bad beat you sit out of all your games and walk about your house for five minutes and then return and play again and keep repeating this every time you receive a bad beat

be friendly fish - you are the worst ever

lmfao

Show me the content where you're supposed to lose 100k+ in 2nl.

You should read this new article from your personal poker god. If you followed this advice you would only be a small fish instead of the biggest whale at your tables: https://www.blackrain79.com/2020/07/...o-on-tilt.html

Paisting is not a Finnish name, I checked surname statistics and 0 people have that name, dead or alive

Also paisti is Finnish poker slang for fish so it would be a cosmic miracle if the worst paisti of all time had the name Paisting

It's funny

Man claims to have read all these books on Poker Strategy

But he somehow skipped out on the one book that would have made him more money than all of them put together:

Mental Game of Poker by Jared Tendler

If he ever finally started to acknowledge his obvious tilt problems and tried to apply the knowledge from that book he might actually have a chance at a winning session

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

WTF is this? Which one's Paisting?

If you can’t work out which one Paisting is...

When he's not shoving ATC, he has pro moves like playing monster 53s from UTG.

Please be careful or else you might find yourself tied to a tree some day and have some weirdo ask you how you feel hahaha

Just look for the worst hand in every spot and you have found Paisting.

I leave that as an exercise for the reader

You use a tracker, don't you? You could easily filter for suckouts and see how often it actually happens. I mean... your All-In EV Line is already a very good indicator, because most of your losses seem to come from All-In hands. The important part isn't if your actually winnings are below or above that line, but the line itself. Is it above $0? Then you made +EV All-In decisions. Is it below $0? Then you made -EV All-In decisions. I don't want to search for your last graph with an EV Line, but if I take a look at the first one... well... most of the time you don't seem to put it in with 94% equity, because then your EV Line would be positive.

I know everyone already tried, but I would feel bad if I didn't try it myself. Why don't you want any help? You could fix some of your leaks sooooo easily and you could even verify yourself if a fix could work. Like your obsession to defend your blinds. You repeated several times that you "need to take a stand" against people steeling your blinds. So why don't you check if your defense strategy is working? You play quite some hands, so the results should be significant enough.

In the last graph you posted you had ~28.000 hands tracked, so about 4666 times the big blind and 4666 the small blind => $46.66 + $93.32 = $139.98. If you would have folded every single blind blindly you would have lost about $140. Now check your positional stats, did you lose more or less in those positions?

You probably won't read or react to this, but even you have to see that your current strategy doesn't seem to work. Not because of the suckouts you love to post, we all have those, but because of a lot of very bad and very expensive decisions.

Oh well, now at least I tried, too.

Imagine being absolute terrible at a game you played for almost 15 years and blaming everybody but yourself.