Quote:
Originally Posted by candybar
How does this adjust for Drtg is? Do you even know DRtg is? Again, there's not a lot of value in chucking up shots at low efficiency. We already know Lebron has higher TS+, TS Add (peak & cumulative). Were you an inefficient chucker too?
You got the years wrong probably because of your cognitive limitations. MJ had 5 seasons where this was the case. His TS Add these 5 seasons (age in parens):
172.3 (32)
132.8 (33)
42.5 (34)
-155.2 (38)
-94.2 (39)
Lebron TS Add during 5 such seasons
-95.3 (19)
95.7 (20)
141.6 (21)
42.6 (22)
109.3 (23)
And let's keep this in mind, we're comparing pre-peak Lebron to MJ during his second three-peat.
Okay so we established Jordan's superior raw scoring numbers regardless of conditions/environment, and now your TS argument falls down because of the following reasons, in order of importance:
1) Shooting efficiency falls under the umbrella of efficiency per possession (ortg), where Jordan's was higher due to goat IQ (all-time low turnover rate) - the most significant factor is that Jordan's efficiency per possession was higher despite using more possessions (the most ever).. Accordingly, history shows that by using the most possessions ever at superior efficiency, it's possible to control a ball game better than anyone ever has (6/6) and lead the only dynasty that wasn't a "super-team" of all-stars and franchise players.
2) TS is correlated with brand of ball such as a drive-heavy rim attack, aka drive-and-kick "smashmouth" brand of ball versus a zippy ball movement brand and superior chemistry that requires more jumpshooting from the star.. The former brand (smashmouth) has the top 3 record losses in Finals history (14', 17', 18'), while the latter is 6-0 without needing a Game 7.. In other words, TS isn't a great argument..
3)) TS is correlated with the amount of defensive attention that a player faced, and MJ faced far more by virtue of Krause's roster that forced MJ to carry the scoring load, aka defeat max defensive attention - this negatively-impacts TS yet Jordan still was still within 2 points of Lebron in TS despite the night-and-day difference in defensive attention and scoring burden, as well as the aforementioned chemistry and brand of ball requirements of the team (more jumpshooting required).
4) Many people have better TS than Lebron, so TS is a weaker argument than Jordan's PPG, goat usage-level of possessions coupled with the best efficiency on those possessions (ortg), and goat scoring burden (carrying scoring load, aka defeating max defensive attention), or his goat 2-way arguments, or his goat clutch arguments, or his goat skill arguments (goat 2-point jumpshooter).
5) The TS margins above league-average are influenced by today's top-heavy league (3-and-D robot role players vs the stars/skilled players) as opposed to a more balanced level of good/great players in previous eras where it was harder to achieve TS advantage over peers.. Everyone shot like crap against packed paints and zero spacing, whereas today's stars have more ways to find advantages over their peers in a spaced-out, hands-off beginner format, and benefit more from this easier format than roles players, of which there are more in today's game (3-and-D) - large swathes of today's players are homogenized in the current spacing format (3-and-D) compared to the more intricate roles required of each individual in the no-spacing eras.