Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
right and thats my point along with how silly the crowd size nonsense is
But not their candidate? Nobody is forcing you to defend and support hilary, just read the posts above, nevermind months of it. I can't say you are guilty of this but have a look around you. Yeah scrutinize trump but it gets weird when you support and defend hilary while your face melts off at the prospect of trump not releasing his tax returns even though hes being audited. Again, the placement of outrage from hilarys supporters and defenders
No, Juan, people aren't expecting failed Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton to be subjected to the same sort of scrutiny as current President of the United States Donald Trump. This should not come as a surprise to you. The things Donald Trump
does as President carry far more weight than the things Hillary Clinton
did as a failed democratic candidate.
The charred remains of her political aspirations can be found at the bottom of the November dumpster fire. Trumps currently inhabit the most powerful office in the world. At some stage his actions have to stand by themselves and not seek to be justified via using the crutch of the past political failures of others.
Quote:
Scrutiny is a good thing and trump deserves it, im commenting on the hypocrisy based on the level of outrage. Again it seems way off balance. Crowd size gate seems like a great example
Seems like a weaksauce argument. If my son's just nicked my car, crashed it into a tree and then spilled coffee on my shoes only a fool would say my level of outrage was caused and defined solely by the latest incident.