The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. - Page 1020 - Politics and Economics

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics

The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

...

Page 1020 of 5382

First

20 520 820 920 970 1000 1010 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1030 1040 1070 1120 1220 1520 2020

Last

Page 1020 of 5382

First

20 520 820 920 970 1000 1010 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1030 1040 1070 1120 1220 1520 2020

Last

04-10-2017 , 07:01 PM

#25476

otatop

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 12,721

Quote:

Originally Posted by m_reed05

Lol Dems forever.

04-10-2017 , 07:48 PM

#25477

poconoder

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2017 Posts: 370

These guys are so full of it. The Reid Nuclear option blasted the filibuster for hundreds of positions, and now they think we are stupid. Have they no shame?

Quote:

Originally Posted by m_reed05

Lol Dems forever.

04-10-2017 , 07:53 PM

#25478

m_reed05

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,611

Quote:

Originally Posted by poconoder

These guys are so full of it. The Reid Nuclear option blasted the filibuster for hundreds of positions, and now they think we are stupid. Have they no shame?

Lol you.

04-10-2017 , 08:06 PM

#25479

Paul McSwizzle

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 5,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by awval999

Fly that's the point I'm trying to make re:trade

You may laugh at those white coal miners. They elected Trump. To fix it. If it's not fixable, 46 will be worse.

Trump certainly ain't fixing **** and the next president will be a Democrat, so I think you are wrong.

04-10-2017 , 08:12 PM

#25480

poconoder

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2017 Posts: 370

Quote:

Originally Posted by m_reed05

Quote:

Originally Posted by poconoder

These guys are so full of it. The Reid Nuclear option blasted the filibuster for hundreds of positions, and now they think we are stupid. Have they no shame?

Lol you.

Any one who is not willing to hold both parties to account for their nonsense is not worth listening to.

04-10-2017 , 08:16 PM

#25481

MrWookie

Don't Call Me Meredith

Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 94,159

Quote:

Originally Posted by poconoder

Any one who is not willing to hold both parties to account for their nonsense is not worth listening to.

Hahahahaha. OK, I suppose we start with you.

04-10-2017 , 08:17 PM

#25482

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,910

Reid was forced to use that nuclear option because of McConnell's unprecedented blocking of lower court nominees from Obama. They tried to negotiate with McConnell multiple times, but he would never give an inch, so they were forced to go nuclear.

Look back in history. The time before that when Republicans deployed unprecedented obstruction, Democrats "compromised" with Republicans and arguably got by far the worse end of the deal. This has been forced by Republicans over a long series of many years.

04-10-2017 , 08:18 PM

#25483

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,910

It's also completely unprecedented to not even bring a nominee up for a hearing. That's something McConnell decided to do within an hour of Scalia's death. He destroyed the Senate systematically and for his own personal political gain.

04-10-2017 , 08:22 PM

#25484

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 100,712

Trump (fingers on tweetin' phone): "Tell me the San Bernardino shooter was Muslim. One time dealer. Oh ****. He wasn't another white supremacist was he?"

"He was black sir."

"Hmmmm"

04-10-2017 , 08:29 PM

#25485

poconoder

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2017 Posts: 370

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrWookie

Hahahahaha. OK, I suppose we start with you.

No we start with everybody. Both parties are full of hypocrites and liars, don't you agree?

04-10-2017 , 08:34 PM

#25486

MrWookie

Don't Call Me Meredith

Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 94,159

Quote:

Originally Posted by poconoder

No we start with everybody. Both parties are full of hypocrites and liars, don't you agree?

Lol

04-10-2017 , 08:37 PM

#25487

Paul McSwizzle

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 5,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by m_reed05

Lol Dems forever.

As I said, when the Dem led government stacks the court 25 years from now, it will not be these Dems.

04-10-2017 , 08:58 PM

#25488

sofocused978

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 6,764

Has TRUMP said anything about the school shooting?

04-10-2017 , 09:00 PM

#25489

FlyWf

It's the other way

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 58,090

There's a decent chance the Dems run in 2020 on "We'll build the Wall, underbudget and on schedule. Also we'll do OUR Muslim ban right so the courts can't strike it down!"

04-10-2017 , 09:09 PM

#25490

dinopoker

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,437

I'd pay anything for Gorsuch to turn out to be a closet liberal. Be the sweetest moment in American history.

04-10-2017 , 09:43 PM

#25491

2OutsNoProb

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 15,991

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinopoker

I'd pay anything for Gorsuch to turn out to be a closet liberal. Be the sweetest moment in American history.

A Trump supporter would likely go full-on Pelican Brief on him.

04-10-2017 , 09:44 PM

#25492

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,910

Sadly Gorsuch was vetted by the Heritage Fdn, not by 45*. They actually know how to do work.

04-10-2017 , 09:48 PM

#25493

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,320

Quote:

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) plans to do away with a nearly century-old, state-run nature magazine, sparking outrage among critics who see it as part of an ongoing anti-environment agenda.

Walker’s*2017-2019 budget, which he unveiled in February, calls for suspending publication*of Wisconsin Natural Resources next year. The magazine, a product of the state Department of Natural Resources, has kept Wisconsinites informed about hunting and fishing opportunities, species conservation, environmental issues and much more*since 1919.

The Walker administration argues it doesn’t fit the department’s core mission.

Well OK I can understand getting rid of a program that's a money sink. It might be nice to have but sometimes you have to go with the most bang for your buck

Quote:

Kassulke noted that the magazine, which is published six times a year,*is funded entirely by its more than 80,000 subscribers. A subscription costs*$8.97.

Oh but then why would they get rid of it

Quote:

The proposed shutdown of the magazine appears to be part of a larger attack on environmental science by the Republican governor.

With Walker in office, Wisconsin has rolled back environmental regulations and*slashed Department of Natural Resources funding, resulting in the elimination of half the agency’s scientists. Last year, references to climate change were scrubbed from its website, part of a continued push to*silence discussions of climate change*at the agency.

The magazine saw “editorial oversight dramatically increase” in 2013 after it ran an insert on climate change funded by the Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, according to Natasha Kassulke, who served as the magazine’s editor for five years until mid-2016. “From then on, all stories were vetted by officials within the state Department of Natural Resources,” Kassulke wrote in a recent Chippewa Herald op-ed. “They spiked stories having to do with climate change, a federally endangered mammal living near a proposed iron mine, and challenges to the privatization of groundwater.”

Oh.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/scott...0c89f9120372c?

04-10-2017 , 09:56 PM

#25494

Onlydo2days

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 19,950

I have a question, if we killed Kim somehow or if he left?

What would NK look like? This is a lot closer to Japan/Germany in 1945 than Iraq in 2003 right?

04-10-2017 , 10:03 PM

#25495

Namath12

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 55,849

Russian embassy trolling

04-10-2017 , 10:29 PM

#25496

Kirbynator

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 52,004

right on Q trump back over 40% approval after bombing some old planes with bombs that he's profiting from

04-10-2017 , 10:34 PM

#25497

ASAP17

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 5,882

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kirbynator

right on Q trump back over 40% approval after bombing some old planes with bombs that he's profiting from

Who gives a **** about approval ratings? They are one of the single most pointless metrics especially when your party is in complete control of the federal government. Get back to me in fantasy land when the GOP decides to help impeaching Trump (better chance he dies probably than that happening in real life regardless of whatever scandal comes up in the future).