You are posting here like words have meaning.

I should know better than to engage you but if you don't see that that's going to happen, you're turning a blind eye for whatever reason.

Trump issues Muslim ban.
Trump is attempting to rename the "Countering Violent Extremism" to "Countering Islamic Extremism" while getting rid of keeping an eye on other groups aiming to hurt others. This is directly going to hurt Muslims, btw.
Trump is attempting to make Christians superior to every other religion/atheist.
There will be a terrorist act on US soil eventually.
That's when the illegal jailings and unconstitutional acts will happen.

This **** is literally a matter of time and you know it.

Despite being to the left on most social issues, including that abortion should be legal for ANY reason even if its just "meh, I am not feeling like having a kid," I do think its pretty clear that custody and child support issues dramatically favor women in a wide majority of cases where the decision is left to the courts/state.

The best example of this is that custody is overwhelmingly awarded to women in instances where both parents are fully capable of raising the child in a healthy and nurturing environment.

Once a woman gets pregnant it is practically impossible for a male to get custody from a woman unless the woman doesn't want custody unless there is gross negligence or serious criminal activity that is also provable in court.

And it is a fact that abortion is a decision that only takes one person to make even in cases where the sex was consensual and the parties are split on what to do. I don't believe it is humane or moral to make a woman have the baby if she doesn't want to. However, I do also think that if the woman has the baby and the couple is not together that the man should have custody and receive child support if he is in a better position to provide for it and wants to raise the child.

A natural conclusion would be that he probably wants it.

Hmmmm.... maybe my recollection is a little foggy but wasn't Chamberlain's appeasement and "peace in out time" remarks made after the signing of the Munich Agreement with Hitler in 1938 after the invasion of Czechoslovakia?

217+ peaceful demonstrators and journalists were charged with felony rioting for standing around a place where other people broke windows and for other people burning a limo after they were arrested.

Well, OK, but I don't think anyone using the term is thinking about 'signalling' as an economic term of art.

Take that, rural poors who supported trump!

http://www.theverge.com/2017/2/3/145...tions-reversed

Enjoy your more expensive internet

Lack of knowledge and the lack of any desire to understand issues has always amazed me.

I don't think that was exactly his point, but it's more like 1933 now and no one wants it to get as far as 1938.

No... I don't "know" it... but I am certainly glad to be in the company of Jean Dixon and other assorted soothsayers... can the Oracle at Delphi be far behind!

I'm guessing "Trump wanting to make christians superior to to every other religion" would come as a big surprise to his daughter (who he is sooooo enamored of) and his son-in-law who was instrumental in getting him elected.

That doesn't sound just a little bit over the top when you read what YOU wrote slowly and just not blathering out a jumbled stream of consciousness that's rattling around in your brain like an ear worm from your echo chamber?

But your entire basis for civil disobedience in an uncivil fashion is you "think" bad stuff is going to happen.... not that it already has happened

Get the abortion **** outta here.

The largest protest in American history went off without a single arrest.

Trump's most forceful executive order on immigration isn't the immigration ban
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump...r-chaos-2017-1

On the square? If memory serves it was Trump himself who claimed that it was rigged.

I cant tell if you are delusionnal or trolling,really I cant.
bad stuff has already happened (people turned away at airports or detained when they have green cards,visas etc... aka legal documents that from one minute to another became illegal with no notice).
just that point you cant ignore it can you?

Also I have one question for trump supporters:
Do you guys feels the majority or your country and pretty much the vast majority of the world,is criticizing you just for fun and bullying or that maybe just maybe there is something more going on there?

He commented on Zizak's Chamberlain comment where Ziz said we wasn't inclined to grab his ankles like Chamberlain did.

But what makes Trump the next Hitler in your eyes? Truly. Analogous to 1933 Germany? How? Has the congress been burnt to the ground? Has congress given Trump new dictatorial powers and then dissolved?

Probably not a really good analogy, unless you just want to say Trump = Hitler without any evidence. (which is certainly your right.... just as it is my right to giggle uncontrollably at the notion).

Yeah the truth is a large portion of the public just doesn't buy that this election was legitimate.

All the Trump voters here are ready to shut out politics until the next election now.

"The election is over stop talking about politics!"
"Instead of politics post a photo of your AK-47."

It is self defeating too. If Trump's going to enact his policy regardless of what liberals do then who cares if they protest?

They've already trotted out two attempts at Reichtag fires with lies about a naval attack and a massacre. And there are a lot of people who believe those lies.

The attacks on minority groups, religious groups, the press, intellectuals, challenging the notion of facts, the judiciary, loyalty oaths, loyalty tests, threats to political opponents etc.. The list goes on and on.

We're not waiting for the firing squads to start complaining. At that point it's too late.

Let's wait to see what happens if they lose.

How do Republicans justify actions like these? Do they cheer that they are getting rid of big government? Is that how they sleep better at night knowing that their actions deprive people of services?