Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Your original point was that ISIS isn't attacking in the US because of the vigilance of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies. I think it's much more likely to be for other reasons - they don't have the resources, they have other priorities, they've strategically decided not to attack the US, etc.
If they wanted to make us a priority, and they still have the resources, it would not be that hard to commit fairly frequent attacks with 10+ dead in the US.
I think they still want to keep attacking the US as a priority, but I think they may be unable to efficiently move men and resources out of their territory at this point. Most attacks seem to be carried out by people that are radicalized online that were born in the area they attacked, not people trained/funded directly by ISIS.
In theory, if they got someone from their territory into the Schengen Area with a clean passport, it wouldn't be that hard to get them to the states to then carry out a plan. Since this hasn't happened, I assume that it's a combination of:
a) Having difficulty defending their territory even with the manpower they have, and hence not being able to afford to move people to use in attacks.
b) Probably being under a heavy amount of surveillance in terms of roads in and out of their territory (gotta assume all major Western powers have satellites constantly watching).
c) Having to get through a great deal of not only hostile territory, but hostile territory that's actively a war zone.
and
d) Having easier ways to keep attacking, even if less often.