Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
he was winning this thread so much he made charlie sheen look like bumblebee (LC/NC nsfw) he was winning this thread so much he made charlie sheen look like bumblebee (LC/NC nsfw)

05-31-2011 , 05:59 PM
wow, never thought I would be able to keep up with you guys...

First serious LC/NC argument ever iirc
05-31-2011 , 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy_Jenkins45
I c nipple , is dat legal ?
legalize nipples IMO.
05-31-2011 , 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy_Jenkins45
So you think that by gun control ( ie : disarming law abiding citizens ) that volent crimes will go down ? Some shocking stats taken from gun owners of america .

* Canada: After enacting stringent gun control laws in 1991 and 1995, Canada has not made its citizens any safer. "The contrast between the criminal violence rates in the United States and in Canada is dramatic," says Canadian criminologist Gary Mauser in 2003. "Over the past decade, the rate of violent crime in Canada has increased while in the United States the violent crime rate has plummeted." 3
obv incredibly biased stats, also "75% of people are easily convinced by statistics", Violent crime in 15-year decline since 1991 in Canada

I'm not particularly leaning either way, as long as I've been around we've had strict laws on guns so I'm just used to that.

Though we do tend to respond to our most violent cities by giving them a professional hockey team
05-31-2011 , 06:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spliffstar
guns are for people that simply got no game when it comes to fistfights . and for americans
lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy_Jenkins45
and for lolcountry boys (me) who like shootin crap in the back yard
redneck

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy_Jenkins45
Yeah , that would suck . But if they used a knife would you have the same feelings about knives ? ( not starting a debate I promise , just curious what you think )

shooting is alot of fun and competitive amongst friends . That and for home defense . Those are my reasons for owning guns . i live out in the country and work nights , so the wife wanted a gun . Also , shooting is a family tradition of mine . My grandpa taught me gun safety and how to shoot and my dad has taught my son the same things . I guess for us at least it's more of a family activity .
Shooting for sport is different than, hey guns are cool i want one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by inthepub5
i hate knives too (been stabbed once but only in the hand) but theyre not as bad because atleast you have a chance vs a knife
lolliverpool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy_Jenkins45
Wow , you hang out in some rough spots lol . I see your point . I guess to each their own
see above

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBobLP
Hello sir...I demand the till from your cash register and if you refuse I challenge you to a throwdown in fisticuffs
yea, its good to have easy access to guns so criminals dont get it too hard ldo

Quote:
Originally Posted by bumblebee99
Jees - just debate the pros and cons guize!
i actually agree with bee [his edit]

Quote:
Originally Posted by wafflehouse1
AE and JJ are among the misinformed I feel. Responsible gun owners NEVER point a gun at anyone, loaded or unloaded, EVER. We are there to Protect the people from the violent nuts that think they are some badass mofos when they are armed.
The people are much safer when we are allowed to legally own guns, because if they are regulated, criminals will get them anyway. At least giving the people an option gives us a chance.

Awesome cake ice.
Yea if they cant have guns, who is there to protect people from people with guns

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBobLP
Was going to reply to ae but this is a good enough reply. Americans get a bad rep for stereotyping and the like but there's a lot of it going on against Americans itt.
thats because americans are fat lazy and dumb. didnt you read my cliffs on different countries

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy_Jenkins45
Imho , a gun debate never works because people are either very for it or very against it . You wont change someones mind with a debate no matter how hard you win the debate . I know this from experience and I'm not even gonna try . Someone who is on the fence about the issue is worth educating about it , but anti gun people just do not change . Thats cool to me tho i suppose . At least you take a side on the issue albeit the wrong one

I have a very libertarian view on things . I'm for pretty much whatever . Drugs etc . As long as your decisions dont affect me , do what you want iyam .
simple, if you need a gun -farmer, hunter whatever. its fine. just dont give them to ever idiot who wants one [not all are idiots but how do you filter them]

Quote:
Originally Posted by inthepub5
Waffle is correct to an extent.

Look at I think either sweden or switserland countries where due to national service or wotever there is a gun in most houses. Then look at america.
Murder rates imply it is not gun ownership but society tht is the problem
im also pretty sure countries with national service teach those people with the guns how to use them correctly and safely

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy_Jenkins45
Making it illegal isnt stopping them from doing it now either . The same amount of people will do the drugs . i believe that usage will actually decrease , but thats just my oppinion again . What I'm saying tho is that legal or illegal the drugs will still be used . I could buy just about any drug you could think of with just a few phone calls . The availability is already there .
facepalm.jpg how would making it easier decrease usage. also if it aint legal the taboo wears off, people start using rec and then things get crazy. if you mean cannabis, its not as bad as heavy drugs like coke, heroine ldo

Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Ertbjerg
wow, never thought I would be able to keep up with you guys...

First serious LC/NC argument ever iirc
yea i got bored reading and multiquoting and forgot half of my witty repsonses but i once again have to say AE is winning thread atm
05-31-2011 , 06:36 PM
also when i think of americans and their guns i cant help but think of this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIpLd0WQKCY

and the "how would you like it if the king of england came in here now" statement
05-31-2011 , 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bumblebee99


skype is bumblebee9779
You should post this in the micros imo. Wookie like. YOu make big points.
05-31-2011 , 06:42 PM
88.5% of all statistics are made up on the spot i heard
05-31-2011 , 07:10 PM
I chuckle at the thoughts of the fool ever being considered relevant in any possible situation
05-31-2011 , 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bumblebee99
Of course they wouldn't, but how much are we going to sell quality coke for? And how are the jobless, addicts going to pay for it from Tesco?
You're right and all the problems wouldn't go away overnight - but the criminality would disappear overnight. The criminality of drugs is one of the most harmful aspects. It tears families apart and deems people unemployable if they get caught. Plus the money wasted on futile policing could be directed to addiction services.

Quote:
Would being an illegal distributor be legal? What if a dodgy E you sold ended up killing someone?
That's would be manslaughter imo. The dodgy E thing is really rare in spite of its illegality. With people opening drug shops they'd at least have a reputation to uphold and there would be little market for illegal drugs. As above you don't really get illegal alcohol sales for that very reason.


Quote:
child neglect and violence.

a lot of which I guess is associated with poverty, drug use and alcoholism.
Yep, but if we remove the criminality of it and divert resources used to try to stop illegal drugs to addiction and child services the harm would probably be reduced hugely.
05-31-2011 , 07:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Ertbjerg
I'll be fine though, I have a degree that allows me to deal drugs legaly
Can you write scripts tho ???

Aren't pharmacists just bag men for the doctors ???
05-31-2011 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinJude
You're right and all the problems wouldn't go away overnight - but the criminality would disappear overnight. The criminality of drugs is one of the most harmful aspects. It tears families apart and deems people unemployable if they get caught. Plus the money wasted on futile policing could be directed to addiction services.



That's would be manslaughter imo. The dodgy E thing is really rare in spite of its illegality. With people opening drug shops they'd at least have a reputation to uphold and there would be little market for illegal drugs. As above you don't really get illegal alcohol sales for that very reason.


Yep, but if we remove the criminality of it and divert resources used to try to stop illegal drugs to addiction and child services the harm would probably be reduced hugely.
I assume you would want the drugs to be sold through a pharmacy and not just be freely available at your local convenience store?

How about prescription drugs? should they be freely available? antibiotics?
05-31-2011 , 07:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by obviously.bogus
Can you write scripts tho ???

Aren't pharmacists just bag men for the doctors ???
no I can't and I will readily admit the pharmacy service in the US is absolutely inadequate. I haven't had the pleasure of dealing with the UK system yet.

In my own private fantasy world pharmacist would write the prescriptions though. We know more about the pharmaceuticals so once the doctors have made the diagnosis the pharmacist should make the prescription. That's never going to happen though.

Also, I have never worked in a pharmacy I went the research way instead.
05-31-2011 , 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Ertbjerg
I assume you would want the drugs to be sold through a pharmacy and not just be freely available at your local convenience store?
Nope. Why not just have them in drug shops like off licences? If you put them in a pharmacy and start over-regulating it you drive the cost up and invite a black market straight back with all the associated violence and criminality.

Quote:
How about prescription drugs? should they be freely available? antibiotics?
I don't see how there would be a market for non psychoactive prescription drugs. Of course the drug shops would have benzos and the drug companies would be only too happy to produce them.

In fact the drug companies would probably become the producers and refiners of fun drugs. Again, reputations would have to upheld which would lead to greater safety.
05-31-2011 , 08:04 PM
NUKE THREAD ONE TIME PLS DEALER
05-31-2011 , 08:05 PM
make poverty history cheaper drugs for everyone
05-31-2011 , 08:10 PM
i dont see how making coke or heroine legal would stop it being a problem. they are a problem because they are highly addictive substances which causes addictions. Making them readily available would increase that.

How is saying, hey everyone, its fine to take these now, its legal, you'll get in no trouble. I would say alot of people stay away from drugs because its a taboo, you dont want to be viewed as a druggie etc, take away part of the taboo leads to more use.

More use equals more addicts. imo its a dumb arguement. I can see an arguement for canabis as its basically just smoking. but class a drugs, like seriously.
05-31-2011 , 08:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinJude
Nope. Why not just have them in drug shops like off licences? If you put them in a pharmacy and start over-regulating it you drive the cost up and invite a black market straight back with all the associated violence and criminality.



I don't see how there would be a market for non psychoactive prescription drugs. Of course the drug shops would have benzos and the drug companies would be only too happy to produce them.

In fact the drug companies would probably become the producers and refiners of fun drugs. Again, reputations would have to upheld which would lead to greater safety.
So no professional staff to look after people? To advice on the effects on mixing whatever drug with a prescription drug?

How would you decide between drugs to be sold at a pharmacy and drugs to be sold in your drug store? Surely the drug store would be interested in selling prescription drugs. And there will be a market for a bunch of other stuff, not just analgesic and psycho stimulants. What do you think happens when the doctor wont prescribe antibiotics against that pneumonia for the 2 year old kid? There is plenty of stupid people who would never understand that it may be viral and not bacterial. They would happily purchase antibiotics at your store. The doctors are losing their authority. If stupid people read stuff on the internet they believe it. Then they would want to buy whatever they think they need.

Also, I don't see why the pharmacy prices would be higher than the drug stores.

Of course in a legal market the drugs will be produced by pharmaceutical companies and they would be good and clean. I don't dispute that.
05-31-2011 , 08:14 PM


drugs are bad mkay


Quote:
Of course in a legal market the drugs will be produced by pharmaceutical companies and they would be good and clean. I don't dispute that.
That is about the only valid reason.
05-31-2011 , 08:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBobLP
NUKE THREAD ONE TIME PLS DEALER
what, thread is getting interesting IMO
05-31-2011 , 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Ertbjerg
what, thread is getting interesting IMO
EXACTLY
05-31-2011 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Ertbjerg
So no professional staff to look after people? To advice on the effects on mixing whatever drug with a prescription drug?
Lol they don't thave that at the minute so why would they need it if it was legalised? You could have information leaflets.

Quote:
How would you decide between drugs to be sold at a pharmacy and drugs to be sold in your drug store? Surely the drug store would be interested in selling prescription drugs.
Why? I doubt there's a big market for blood pressure tablets or anti-biotics. Everything psychoactive should be available in a shop imo. If the doctors want some medicines accesible only by prescription then fine. Hands off the fun drugs though.

Quote:
What do you think happens when the doctor wont prescribe antibiotics against that pneumonia for the 2 year old kid? There is plenty of stupid people who would never understand that it may be viral and not bacterial.
Stupid parents are stupid. Keep certain medicines under control I guess.

Quote:
The doctors are losing their authority. If stupid people read stuff on the internet they believe it. Then they would want to buy whatever they think they need.
You will always get stupid people - but should responsible people be punished because of them? I'm asthmatic. I manage it fairly well and yet I still have to go to a doctor to get a prescription for medication? Why? I'm paying him for his f#*king autograph! I find it patronizing and extortionate tbh.

Quote:
Also, I don't see why the pharmacy prices would be higher than the drug stores.
Fair enough - but I doubt that pharmacies would want the business tbh.
05-31-2011 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBobLP
EXACTLY
Help the English-as-second-language-guy out here. In the SoFlo accent you have taking to lately you "nuke" threads when they become interesting?

This "nuking" I assume is not the textbok definition as given by the Oxford dictionary nor the slang definition one could assume being used amongst the young hip guys in America.

So enlighten me, what is the new meaning of "nuke"?
05-31-2011 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyfool1985
LEAVE MY SISTER OUT OF THIS FFS
05-31-2011 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Ertbjerg
In my own private fantasy world pharmacist would write the prescriptions though. We know more about the pharmaceuticals so once the doctors have made the diagnosis the pharmacist should make the prescription. That's never going to happen though.
Makes sense, (even though I know next to nothing about medicine). When I was a kid, my mum would would often ask the pharmacist about minor medical that may not be worth bothering the doctor about. That was OK when Mr W. the pharmacist was older than she was. She was also OK with it when my sister dated Andy W. the pharmacists son for a year or so in high school. But when Andy W. got his degree and took over the family business she found it weird and maybe wasn't so comfortable raising potentially embarrassing things with the pharmacist she remembered as a kid.

It just seems crazy that retail pharmacists are highly educated, yet what they do in this day and age (where Mr W. the local pharmacist is a rarity) is essentially pill counting. (And I know you're research not retail, but you started my train of thought by your "I'm allowed to deal drugs" comment)
05-31-2011 , 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Ertbjerg
So enlighten me, what is the new meaning of "nuke"?
I think the serious tones, lack of boobs, and decentering effect are disturbing Tbun.

      
m