You guys are completely misunderstanding the situation because you're looking at things with the added perspective of this thread. This will be the last time I post about this in this thread as I don't want to derail the OP.
Before anybody says what they think I was obligated to do morally, they should read the OP (
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/19...posed-1302905/) and see how things unraveled originally.
A player sat me on Cake and lost a few flips with a failed bluff for a total of $5k. Player berates me a ton before leaving the table. Then nba_guru accuses me of hacking him and cheating and having the money chip dumped to me. Anyone who plays high stakes regularly knows this happens frequently.. frantic degens always trying to beg/scam known high stakes players in various ways. If I entertained every observer who told me a sob story about how they lost their money, I'd have no time to play poker.
However, nba_guru started a thread on 2p2 so I thought okay, maybe he wasn't just a degen making up a story. I posted to explain what my experiences were, and to defend myself against his accusations of me stealing his money somehow. Keep in mind that at this point, nba_guru was relatively new to 2p2, someone with a very low post count, sounded a little childish, and was throwing around accusations at long-time reputable 2p2ers with zero justification. He didn't exactly gain a lot of my respect after all of the names he was calling me for all of the bad things I did to him.
Once it started to become more of a possibility that n_g was indeed hacked, I started bringing the issue to every HS reg I knew that was online. Literally every single one said it would be absurd for anyone to think I was morally obligated to give back the money. Anybody who plays HSPLO knows that it's incredibly easy/common for a fish to run up 5+ buyins on you in a very short period of time. If the scammer had of won $30k from me winning every flip, is n_g responsible for owing me $30k because the money was won from me with stolen money due to his lack of due diligence?
Also, I think it's pretty absurd to play the card that because I'm a long-time high stakes player and because the money meant a lot to n_g, I have more of a moral obligation to return the money. Just because you're a high stakes pro doesn't mean you're rich and in a position to be handing out $5k to various victims of scammers.
Quote:
Then explain his reasoning for keeping the money and why it is justified. Just because his peers with similar interests say it is ok?
The main reason he isn't paying is to prevent being freerolled. Also because in any online poker game you have no idea where the money has come from that the other players are using and it is not the player's responsibility to make sure that their opponents money comes from legitimate sources. He may be right in some regards in that maybe the Poker Site should shoulder some of the responsibility in this situation (they wont) but it doesn't change the fact that he won stolen goods and now possesses stolen goods (funds). If this had been a live game and lefort was playing the scammer heads up for cash stolen from a bank the police would take Lefort's winnings and return the $ to the bank even though Lefort had no involvement or knowledge of the original crime. Online it doesn't work like that only because it is online with no regulatory agencies. The sites themselves are the closest you are going to get anyone policing these games (which leaves the existing every man for them-self environment).
Just because Lefort assumed some risk in winning the scammers 5k doesn't mean that the stolen 5k shouldn't go back to its rightful owner.
Lefort is a known high stakes player and this 5k meant the world to the low stakes grinder and although not obligated legally he could have done the morally upstanding thing and made the scamming victim whole regardless. Even charge a "recovery fee" commensurate with whatever risk you took to peel the 5k off the scammer if you really just can't stomach the idea of being freerolled or doing something for nothing. Say half the time you would win the 5k half the time you would lose the 5k if you played this scammer in a series of freezeouts. So keep 2,500 and give the victim back 2,500. Its not perfect but neither is the solution you guys decided on in which Lefort keeps 100%.
This isn't 2 random people with vague circumstances around what happened. We know Lefort. We know the victim as a regular poster here. We know the victim was spamming support and table chat as the heads up with Lefort was happening. Stars Shoulda done more. Lefort could do more.
You seem to be missing out on the responsibility of the victim to be doing their due diligence before making transfers in a market with no regulatory agencies. It seems incredibly clear to me that the responsibility is entirely on the victim. You have to understand the risk before making p2p transfers with strangers on the internet. You can't just hope that if you get scammed, the person who was lucky enough to win a flip for your money is going to be philanthropic enough to give it back.
And again, the fact that I'm a high stakes grinder and n_g is a low stakes grinder should have no bearing on the moral actions stemming from the situation. For all you know, my net worth could be negative.
Lastly, a few months after this issue I posted a thread where I'd been scammed for $52k, > 10x the amount n_g was scammed. In my situation, I did not make the stupid mistake of trusting a random stranger for a p2p transfer. I made the mistake of trusting an entire corporation to be able to make player payments. Here was n_g's compassionate response:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...97&postcount=7
Again, this is my last post so if anyone has anything further to say and wants me to read it, pm me. Thanks.