Holy **** that post.

"Oh would u care too 1v1 since your also so good at poker too?"

Is that even English?

LOL the mind of a scared 2 year old.

.?.

Indeed:


Wait, you're not actually serious about this, are you? What he said was 100% correct, so I'd like to know what you thought was incorrect about it. Or are you just trolling?

Also, if you want to say ****, just type ****. Don't circumvent the profanity filter.

No. When I say win consistently I mean at least have some periods of winning, like 20k hands , not just win 5 buys then lose 5 buys to terrible bad beats and just going around in circles.



Here is my KK graph for 5nl rush. Just look at that pathetic show down. KK just does not hold up. Ev is close to worthless because it does not take into account the times you 3 bet 55c, get called by 46 and flop is 566, and you lose a stack which is just what happened to me just then and of course continues to happen. Just unbelievable, and this is micro. Its just pointless, from now on I am going to resort to just open shoving KK, thats how bad its become. Thats what you need to do to beat the rig.

You'll probably still say its rigged as you're only going to get called by AA

Here is my KK graph by hour of the day:



Clearly, WSOP.nj is rigged against KK during the 1-2pm and 9-10pm hours each day. I'm going to start open folding them during these hours to increase my winrate.

Do you ever fold KK postflop? (And i dont mean when an ace is on the board)

Yes?



Perhaps you didn't catch the sarcasm in my "hours of the day" post.

What?

ev line does not account for coolers does it?

If your post still makes sense to you after you read again just forget it.

Carry on.

I think I've given up completely on trying to explain statistics anymore.

Yesterday on SWC chat after a complaint about how something that was unlikely should have been impossible, someone else asked: If you roll a 6 sided die 10 times, what are the odds that a 6 will come up at least once.

There were people who literally could not understand that the odds could not be > 100%...

POKER players --- who didn't understand that you can't have a > 100% chance of something...

SMH, KMN, I give up.

At least you gave it a 110% effort.

All the best.

And KK loses to AK again. Another stack gone. As usual drawing dead against any ace. The 'variance' continues. Its beyond all realms of numbers and statistics now. Why can't I just get a fair game ffs.
'
So now 263 times, and I'm down overall in show down winnings. That's what the rig does. Those aces hit like 10 outers.

Quit all forms of poker right now.

All the best.

Post screenshot of hand histories filtered to where you hold KK?

I just did a few posts up.

When I bust my roll from the rig.

I'll ask the same question someone mistakenly asked TD earlier, thinking he was serious: do you ever fold KK postflop? And not just in obvious cases such as an Ace on board, 4 to a straight or 4 to a flush that misses you?

Allin EV (at least in PT) takes into account how many chips were put in on each street, and your chances of winning the pot at that time.

If you limp with KK, get called by 66, and the pot comes 26Q, and then all the chips go in...if you lose that pot, you're not much below EV. If on the other hand, the chips went in before the flop, then you're well below EV for that hand.

So, yes it does take into account the situation you described (since if you went allin on the flop, you're still significantly ahead).

Edit: it's not, however, always the greatest indicator of "luck" or "rigginess", since if you go allin 35 times with AA in 2NL and win every single one of them, and once in 200NL and lose, then PT/HEM will say you're running below EV, even though you've won a whole lot higher percentage of hands than you should have.

If the hand you described happened 100 times, I would not be shown too much below EV despite running horribly by running into sets so many times, correct? So in that regard it does not take into account coolers and all factors of running bad which is the point I'm making, if I understand it correctly.


I can usually fold it to big raises in non 3 bet pots, but most of the losses and frustration comes from 3 bet pots or pre flop shoves, where Im losing most of the time to any Ax, rag straights, sets on medium boards where you cant fold in 3 bet pot or they slow play until your pot committed etc.

Even regardless if I could not fold, the POINT is with KK being such a big favourite I shouldn't have to be folding it that much over a decent sample like that, because it should friggin hold UP most of the time.

This has to be the phoniest thread here. The same prop posters here over and over. Every couple of weeks a new dummy posts here with a sprinkling of real people surely.

Either A the props will discount citing "proof"

or B the poster will have to be a terrible player because although a majority of these props do not play poker, they have a pearl of wisdom to share.

It's like watching a game of 3 card Monty as a toruist and getting swindled in.

Just wondering do you folks get a pop up as such?

Assuming a non-rigged deal, then you would win about 9 of those hands, on average. If the vast majority of the money went in on the flop, then you would be pretty much spot-on EV. If, on the other hand, the majority of the money went in preflop, then you would be way, way under EV. But yes, in that regard, it's like you said, it doesn't factor in coolers since it doesn't put your opponent in a range of cards -- it puts them on the exact 2 cards they have.

The hand I described was much different than the hand you described, though. In your hand, you were still a ~77% favorite after the flop.

Gee, maybe you should

QUIT PLAYING ON POKERSTARS

you dumb ****.

you were the one going for a backdoor flush with K5 so what is your problem exactly?