perca is just a drug addict and crazy, I'm just crazy

he turned out to be an amazing player though

she will get sued, and two can play at that game

rusty, can you get another auditor?

can you send me the link, I might be able to piece together from memory what tourneys she had

Why would I need to send you a link? You have the file email that has the attachment in it already.

I can post it here if you don't mind though. I also have a trimmed version that's about 1/4 of the size (I just stripped out all the non-essential HTML, which there was a TON of)

no please do post it thanks

OK, files are here:
http://rustybrooks.com/poker/unreal_zeal/

There are two. The one that says "trimmed" is the one that has had a bunch of useless HTML stripped out. It's about 6mb. The other one is about 25mb.

I'm on my way home but I'll probably make a CSV out of it, this HTML is next to useless as is.

wait, you say there is no MU or it's close to even, then why is the total 950? Are you saying that you want the original staking amount back? How much of your money do you think I had in my account because 900 seems way off if there is no makeup. We were doing 500 increments, so how would I ever have 900 of your money in my account. This just doesn't make any sense at all. I never ever ever had 900 of your money in my account at any point in the stake. So how could I owe you that much?

story is falling apart already RJ, you said it's close to even on the MU, but your transfers never totaled more than 500, so where does the 950 come from?

my story is that I had only 235 of your money in my account at BF, but lets see what the numbers say

your story makes no sense, you said it was "close to even", so that means that the most I could have in my acct of yours is 500, since that was the amount you were sending me. How in the world could I be close to even on MU and still owe you 950.

why? because that was a nice round figure you thought you could extort me for

This could easily happen if you busted the first $500 and then she had to top up, and then you won back what you had previously lost and maybe some more on top.

Jeff -

You said the stake was down to $8, but then using your elite grinding skills, you built it back up. How much did you build it back up to?

impossible

the only reason why this account has money plus MU on it is because of the cashout protocols, that has been confirmed she agreed to. It's impossible for me to have had 900 in my account at BF if the makeup was "close to even". If the make up is close to even, then I owe her only the amount of the original stake, which can't be more than 500.

It's impossible. There can't be way for the makeup to be close to even and me to owe her 950 if she only sent in 500 increments. Impossible.

I dunno, we will see by the audit. I grinded her totally out of makeup but she still had the cashout protocols. That is where all the MU comes from and why she had cash and Mu at the same time.

She got killed in MTTs early, she wanted just STTs, I binked on my own on 1/10.

Now I can tell you that the cashout protocol changed 3 times because when it goes to STT only the protocol changed to 30-60. When she switched to MTT select, it went to 40-80.

When it went back to STT only on March 23, we took it down to 20-40.

The point of contention will be two tourney binks between the date she dropped STTs, Dec 29th, to jan 10 when I binked the 1200. I remember telling her she shouldn't have dropped MTTs coz I binked, so she went to select tourneys. She had action on one more bink after that. The one for 933.

I don't think it will matter what happened elsewhere though because I prob broke even

So here are the cashout protocols that Nicole agreed to verbally.

Agreement 1 Dec 10th: I cash out $50 and add it to MU when profit for week is between $100-199. I cash out $100 and add to MU when profit exceeds $200.

Agreement 2 Dec 29th: I cash out $30 and add to MU in winning weeks $60-$119, I cash out $60 and add it to makeup in winning weeks $120+

Agreement 3 Jan 11: I cash out $40 and add to MU in winning weeks $80-$159. I cash out $80 and add to MU in winning weeks $160+

Agreement 4 March 23: I cash out $20 and add to MU in winning weeks $40-$79. I cash out $40 and add to MU in winning weeks $80+

This is all stuff she verbally agreed to. It is confirmed in email that I cashed out 100 in the first week of "her profits" as per her agreement, and she's admitted to having a cashout "scheme" as she called it.

Can you confirm these agreements Nicole?

Now does the forum understand the agreement?

Jeff -

Let's pretend you stuck with Agreement 1 the whole time. Say you start with $900 stake. You win $220 that week, so roll is now $1120. You cash out $100 and she cashes out $100, correct? So now there is $920 left. If you end the stake at that point, how much do you owe her back?

910

but really, the only way that I could ever have 900 in my account of hers is if the makeup was exactly even. The most she sent me was 500, so that is mathematically impossible for the makeup to be less than zero if I have 900 in my account of hers, and she has just admitted that it might be less than zero.

I have never driven a white compact. I drive the same car then as I did now. It is neither white nor compact.

We did meet one time in Rockville. Other than the fact the diner we were originally going to meet on being closed, I don't recall the place, but an eisteins or dunkin sound about right.

I do not recall the date. I do remember your brother being there, as you had no car.

Or at least that's what you told me.

Otherwise no I do not agree to those stake splits you describe, we've been over this before.

Lol that you couldn't have $900 in stake money. I TRANSFERRED YOU OVER 3.5K DURING THE COURSE OF THE STAKE I POSTED THOSE FILES PAGE ONE OF THIS THREAD.

THE ROLL WAS $750 BUMPED FROM $500 TOWARDS THE END OF MARCH TO COVER SOME MORE MTTS PLUS THE $200 "LOAN" YOU BORROWED WITHOUT ASKING FIRST.

ANY PERSON OTHER THAN YOU READING THIS THREAD COULD HAVE TOLD YOU THAT BECAUSE I'VE EXPLAINED THIS MULTIPLE TIMES NOW.

JFC.

the $200 "loan" was my cashouts, which I was way behind on anyway, so you are lying about that, I was withholding them because I decided to use some on rent

we will go through the thread once the numbers come out what other lies you've told

was it a red car with white interior?

also, it's impossible for there to be more than zero MU and you to be owed 900 in cash. you do see that right? you've admitted that there "might" be MU.

do you confirm or deny the cashout protocols in the first place?

or should I go back through the thread and pick out the first five lies you've told so far before ppl start not believing you

IP Ban this thief.

and the data will show without a shadow of a doubt that I never had 900 in my account of yours at any time.

the data is going to bury you

the lies you've told in the thread are going to get you barred from poker rooms everywhere

the false allegations may imprison you

I can't wait for the audit because it will show beyond a shadow of a doubt that I never had more than 900 in my acct of yours at any time during the stake except early when I chopped a win with you. Shipped you 1K.

we chopped weekly to begin, so it's just impossible for you to be owed 900 and when the data proves it you may be arrested

and I was nice enough to just give you the 235 back the day after BF

you took it this far, and you might go to jail now

I can't wait to see what you are going to say when you need two of the tourney binks to make 900 even close. What are you going to say? that you had action on them?

If I am SgtRJ I am getting Jeff barred from MDLive. He is finally reaching a critical level of insanity and I am starting to believe he may launch himself into complete lunacy.

in all seriousness these are very severe allegations that can get you barred from poker rooms so my anxiety about this is justified

SGTRJ is the one who's going to get banned and she works there.

why is everyone anti-me and pro-her? I haven't seen a single thread ITF of someone bringing up stake money after BF. Everyone but us seems to have worked it out somehow. No one who got burned by that fiasco said that keeping the stake money was stealing. How can it possibly be stealing?

Why am I infracted when she is not? Why aren't people drawing infractions for what they are saying about me?

this is the future of poker people, if someone in the leading poker forum can say a number off the top of their head that was left over from BF and call the person who had it a thief when they dispute the figure, and then get everyone to agree with no evidence, then we won't get online poker back ever