Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration

02-06-2014 , 01:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by teh_minbet_pokr
lol yes online poker will never come back because of this incident
it sets a terrible precedent and people who do business in 2p2 should be very very careful. If a talented player like me, and I know I'm not great or anything, I'm great at mid to low, not so much high, can't get a fair hearing, who can? Why is her word better than mine? because she sucks at poker, and ruining a good player ruins the whole game

this is sposed to be a poker site but it's really an anti poker site, people are extremely angry if you show good stats

notice that I am the only poster getting infracted for this thread, why? I have my story and she has hers and they are different. OK why am I the liar? because i'm good at poker and she's not? do you think every winning player is a cheat or angle shooter?

I love this game. I don't even do it for money. I never have. Why do you think I would cheat it? Because I win?

She hasn't even looked at the data set, not once, so how does she know what she's owed? She doesn't have any numbers at all, I've already shown that I keep meticulous track and have had 5 other successful backing deals. Why am I the villain? Because I'm good at poker?

Last edited by attentionnoone; 02-06-2014 at 01:53 AM.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 01:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by attentionnoone
it sets a terrible precedent and people who do business in 2p2 should be very very careful. If a talented player like me, and I know I'm not great or anything, I'm great at mid to low, not so much high, can't get a fair hearing, who can? Why is her word better than mine? because she sucks at poker, and ruining a good player ruins the whole game
I thought you were a top top STT player?
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 01:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by attentionnoone
And since she's taken it this far I do not want the thread to close.

I'm going to run a full audit on this myself. Then I'm sewing her for libel

I said it right for once.


.
Well, since you said it right, just how do you propose to sew her? With what size thread? Do you plan on using regular needles or something special, like the heavy duty ones used for sewing leather?



Lee
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 01:58 AM
I just want it settled and I do want the world to know that whatever problems I have, which I'm seeking help for, I am a square dealer and always have been. I don't want OPM. I give RJ every red nickel she's due. but people like her have to get out of poker or it's bad for all of us. she shouln't be a mod here because she doesn't respect the game at all. she can't be a backer because she will try and free roll mu she can't be a stake because she's terrible, she can't be a mod because she's trying to ruin my rep over nothing

her goal in all of this was to ruin my poker rep so I don't come back to the table, why? is she promoting the game? or destroying it?
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 02:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by attentionnoone
I wasn't getting one from the beginning so it didn't matter. I think it's really a sad state of affairs that it comes to this. Online poker will never come back now. Is this really how you want it. She's accusing me of theft instead of settling the dispute cordially, and extorts me for it?

She could have written backer/staker dispute in the thread title and this is a totally different thread, we would have gotten to the bottom of it a long time ago, she lives near me and we settle and move on.

but nicole has to lie to justify the 900 coz she knows she missed two binks that are big contributors to the profit over the stake and she wanted to ruin me as a poker player coz she's a fish and that's what fish do

I mean it's coming to this bs for less than one thousand dollars, peanuts in the poker world, this is a black eye for you too if you want to play online poker in the US or want to do biz in 2p2. You have to think long and hard if you ever want to play for someone ever again.
I have no reason to side with SGT RJ - I was one of the first people to get some infraction points from her - my only points ever - due to my insistence in the thread about avatars that cause problems - flashing stuff and so on. I didn't bother to carry on that argument because it kinda died out. Otherwise I would have.

But, I have stood up for her here because I see her as a similar character as myself. i.e. somebody who is pretty much a straight-shooting person.

I can also see that you are a 'not very nice person' in this situation, but you may have mitigating reasons. But that is nothing to do with the stake.

Make it right. You will feel better afterwards if you do so.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 02:15 AM
It's possible that she had action in the 1200 bink because

Quote:
Hello Unreal_Zeal,

We have transferred USD 1,083.74 from your account to 'SGT RJ' as per your request.


Good luck to you both.

Regards,

PokerStars Cashier
Whenever her account got much over 500 I would settle. I know she didn't have 900 in my account coz I didn't want her to

this is the 1K ship I sent her jan 10, so I think she did have action in that and not the two others

I was settling her account weekly most of the stake. I didn't ever want much of her money in my acct.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 02:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBrooks
He's settled on a half dozen numbers between minus-something to $1000 so there's no chance you'll pick a number that he'll agree with forever for more than an hour, tops.
FYP!

Quote:
Originally Posted by attentionnoone
you mean after you were already extorting me and threatening this thread?

do you remember meeting me in person on May 3 2011 and where?
SGT RJ is threatening this thread?? I must have missed that part.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by attentionnoone
in all seriousness these are very severe allegations that can get you barred from poker rooms so my anxiety about this is justified

SGTRJ is the one who's going to get banned and she works there.

why is everyone anti-me and pro-her?
Because you are a liar and a thief? Yup, that would be why.

Quote:
I haven't seen a single thread ITF of someone bringing up stake money after BF. Everyone but us seems to have worked it out somehow. No one who got burned by that fiasco said that keeping the stake money was stealing. How can it possibly be stealing?
How could it possibly not be stealing (unless of course the staker released the stakee, which clearly hasn't happened here)?

Quote:
Why am I infracted when she is not? Why aren't people drawing infractions for what they are saying about me?
I refuse to speculate on folk's artistic talents, or lack thereof. Personally, drawing anything beyond bad stick figures is out of my league. Although I'm not bad at glass blowing.

Quote:
this is the future of poker people, if someone in the leading poker forum can say a number off the top of their head that was left over from BF and call the person who had it a thief when they dispute the figure, and then get everyone to agree with no evidence, then we won't get online poker back ever
WOW! WOW!! WOW!!! - This incident is going to cause the United States to never get back online poker!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by attentionnoone
it sets a terrible precedent and people who do business in 2p2 should be very very careful. If a talented player like me, and I know I'm not great or anything, edit: What happened to your being in the top 1% of all players? I'm great at mid to low, not so much high, can't get a fair hearing, who can? Why is her word better than mine? because she sucks at poker, and ruining a good player ruins the whole game

this is sposed to be a poker site but it's really an anti poker site, people are extremely angry if you show good stats

notice that I am the only poster getting infracted for this thread, why? I have my story and she has hers and they are different. OK why am I the liar?
Because you've stated multiple times that you are a liar? Yeah, that must be it.

Lee

Last edited by Lovesantiques; 02-06-2014 at 02:39 AM.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 02:56 AM
Quote:
WOW! WOW!! WOW!!! - This incident is going to cause the United States to never get back online poker!!
after this I personally wouldn't vote for it

she's lied numerous times in the thread or made such contradictory statements that her word is no better than mine

she is getting sued for this, it's damaged my ability to earn money and I can show that most of it is a lie

she said earlier in the thread that she rarely talked to me, then later she said I was a good friend. how is that possible? how can you be good friends with someone you've rarely spoken to?
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 03:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikkeD

I can also see that you are a 'not very nice person' in this situation, but you may have mitigating reasons. But that is nothing to do with the stake.
.
she's crushed my ability to earn money over the last 3 years tho, all she had to do was say yay, my poker career continues after BF. Once she became a mod that was never going to be possible. This was her goal all along.

I should totally be forgiven for the way I've acted because I could have made 60K/year over the last 3 years if she had passed me along like she should have. I grinded her out of MU when she had only 8 dollars in her account with me. I did that coz I didn't want her to lose. I ran bad in MTTs and I sat down and concentrated and brought her all the way back up in STTs. I did this coz I thought we were friends.

She turns around and stabs me in the back. Why?
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 03:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by attentionnoone
she's crushed my ability to earn money over the last 3 years tho, all she had to do was say yay, my poker career continues after BF. Once she became a mod that was never going to be possible. This was her goal all along.

I should totally be forgiven for the way I've acted because I could have made 60K/year over the last 3 years if she had passed me along like she should have. I grinded her out of MU when she had only 8 dollars in her account with me. I did that coz I didn't want her to lose. I ran bad in MTTs and I sat down and concentrated and brought her all the way back up in STTs. I did this coz I thought we were friends.

She turns around and stabs me in the back. Why?
So a 3 year old $1,000 debt has prevented you from reaching your goals of $60,000+ a year? Seems like you are tarded for not paying her off to unlock your sick win rate.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 03:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluffMyNuts
So a 3 year old $1,000 debt has prevented you from reaching your goals of $60,000+ a year? Seems like you are tarded for not paying her off to unlock your sick win rate.
no, the money has never mattered to her, she was going to ruin me in this forum whether I paid her or not, and I personally had 11K disappear into thin air, so I didn't even have the money the whole time. I could have prob borrowed it but then what? she still trashes me

she still thinks she's good at poker and that good players cheat and that's why she doesn't win. that's the whole forum
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 03:35 AM
so close. def need to change the thread title back to the truth.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 04:02 AM
see?

you have a bunch of mods in a poker forum who are terrible at the game and all they want to do is trash the good players, many of the mods haven't played in years or they lost so much they will never go back

how is that the good players fault?
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 04:32 AM
i never claimed to be good at the game. hell, i don't even mod any poker sections. i still have yet to see itt where you are a good player though. i have seen plenty about mental illness and stealing. plenty about you going back on what you say and retracting statements. about back peddling when things don't line up for you, but meh. at least there is this thread to save potential backers from someone who will not make good on what they owe. even if, and a big if from what it seems, the numbers come out in your favor, this thread should stand to how absolutely crazy you are. sorry mang, just a poker fish with an education talking.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 04:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
No, that's not what the email states. You can pretend it does, but it does not state "You are no longer allowed to play in MTTs as part of the stake". Contrast where I do not you not to play cash as part of the stake again, after you did so without my permission, although you are now trying to claim that I it was part of the original stake that I dropped quickly due to one bad session (which means you apparently believe I'm a complete ****ing ******, as I understand variance and downswings. You also would have to provide a rational explanation for why I, a SNG/MTT player who met you, another SNG/MTT player in the MTT strat forums, would be interested in including cash as part of a stake. Although I'm sure in your mind it's because you are one of the top 3 cash game players in the world.)

Me encouraging you to play more of a game (SNGs) where you had a higher ROI and claimed to be less prone to monkey tilt does not equal "you are hereby forbidden to play MTTs on this stake anymore."
don't you think it's kind of weird that I was in MU 1K on a 750 stake?
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 04:57 AM
Jeff,

On 2/10 and 2/12, you sent transfers of $300 and $200, respectively. Those transfers do not appear to have been to RJ (from her log). The audit from PS does not say who those went to. I am guessing those transfers were to your multi account accounts, or similar? Just hoping you can clear that up.

I'm also fascinated by the fact that your "required" weekly cashouts don't seem to exist. The only actual cashout recorded in your audit is your Black Friday cashout. The numbers that would make sense on RJ's end to be related to small weekly cashouts don't seem to have paired transfers on your end, but I can think of reasons why those sizes might be different. I can't think of a good reason why they wouldn't be near simultaneous, though.

When was the $200 disputed "loan"? Can either of you give me a date on that or remind me what the deal was there?
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by attentionnoone
don't you think it's kind of weird that I was in MU 1K on a 750 stake?
Oh let's be fair here. The first thing that happens off the bat in your audit is:

1. She sends you $400. You then have $400 in your account.
2. You win a bit, send her $150 in profits, and leave $100 of her profits in your account, to bring her stake to $500. You also leave your profits in the account!
3. You lose it all, and she sends you $500. You're now $500 in makeup, and are holding $500 of her money.
4. You lose it all, and she sends you $500. You're now $1000 in makeup, and are holding $500 of her money.

At that point, the stake is $1500, and you are $1000 in makeup. This matches the accounting RJ posted several days ago:

475477757 12/4/2010 11:32:58 AM USD -400.00 Unreal_Zeal
479598646 12/13/2010 5:15:12 AM USD 150.50 Unreal_Zeal
483375089 12/20/2010 8:06:35 PM USD -500.00 Unreal_Zeal
487434116 12/29/2010 10:16:28 AM USD -500.00 Unreal_Zeal

Do you dispute that as of 12/29, she had sent you $1400, and you had withheld $100 of her profits, bringing the total staked funds to $1500? Do you dispute that after the transfer on 12/29, the balance in the account was $500? Do you dispute that that means that the makeup was $1000?
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:10 AM
Sorry for the triple post, but I think for clarity people should understand, since this was not clear to me throughout this thread: at the time of Black Friday, Jeff did not have $950, $900, or even $235 in his account. He had approximately $122 in his account, and requested a single cashout for $100. At no time did he have a check from PS for $900 or a similar amount that he could have sent to RJ.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by citanul
Jeff,

On 2/10 and 2/12, you sent transfers of $300 and $200, respectively. Those transfers do not appear to have been to RJ (from her log). The audit from PS does not say who those went to. I am guessing those transfers were to your multi account accounts, or similar? Just hoping you can clear that up.

I'm also fascinated by the fact that your "required" weekly cashouts don't seem to exist. The only actual cashout recorded in your audit is your Black Friday cashout. The numbers that would make sense on RJ's end to be related to small weekly cashouts don't seem to have paired transfers on your end, but I can think of reasons why those sizes might be different. I can't think of a good reason why they wouldn't be near simultaneous, though.

When was the $200 disputed "loan"? Can either of you give me a date on that or remind me what the deal was there?
thanks for checking the numbers

calm down ok please. let's just figure out what I owe her ok, I'm doing the numbers myself too

I never took any of the cashouts coz we were losing. I was withholding them, to keep her stake alive. she was down to 8 on her account, so she didn't have anything to withhold. had I withheld anything, she'd have busted. I kept her roll alive early

the transfers are profit taking. I could cash out on the spot to a friend.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by citanul
Oh let's be fair here. The first thing that happens off the bat in your audit is:

1. She sends you $400. You then have $400 in your account.
2. You win a bit, send her $150 in profits, and leave $100 of her profits in your account, to bring her stake to $500. You also leave your profits in the account!
3. You lose it all, and she sends you $500. You're now $500 in makeup, and are holding $500 of her money.
4. You lose it all, and she sends you $500. You're now $1000 in makeup, and are holding $500 of her money.

At that point, the stake is $1500, and you are $1000 in makeup. This matches the accounting RJ posted several days ago:

475477757 12/4/2010 11:32:58 AM USD -400.00 Unreal_Zeal
479598646 12/13/2010 5:15:12 AM USD 150.50 Unreal_Zeal
483375089 12/20/2010 8:06:35 PM USD -500.00 Unreal_Zeal
487434116 12/29/2010 10:16:28 AM USD -500.00 Unreal_Zeal

Do you dispute that as of 12/29, she had sent you $1400, and you had withheld $100 of her profits, bringing the total staked funds to $1500? Do you dispute that after the transfer on 12/29, the balance in the account was $500? Do you dispute that that means that the makeup was $1000?
um I have an email confirming that yes, the makeup was "a full 1K" on dec 29
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:25 AM
Quote:
2. You win a bit, send her $150 in profits, and leave $100 of her profits in your account, to bring her stake to $500. You also leave your profits in the account!
yes, this is correct, now I'm beginning to think the first week was just a trial run week long stake

Last edited by attentionnoone; 02-06-2014 at 05:32 AM.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:38 AM
Quote:
Got the transfer.

Did you hold out 100 in my proftit to bump the roll?

If so, that would mean you finished up 500? Well done.
ok so there are some gaps in my memory obv, but here is an email dated dec 13
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:39 AM
this is dec 20th so I was settling up weekly at this point

Quote:
Since I didn't get a transfer last night/this morning, I assume you finished down on the roll. Let me know how much you need to get back to $500.

Nicole
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by citanul
Sorry for the triple post, but I think for clarity people should understand, since this was not clear to me throughout this thread: at the time of Black Friday, Jeff did not have $950, $900, or even $235 in his account. He had approximately $122 in his account, and requested a single cashout for $100. At no time did he have a check from PS for $900 or a similar amount that he could have sent to RJ.
ok thank you, it's been a long time

I thought I had 1220 but I only had 122. Thanks

it seems my memory is faulty is some respects
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote
02-06-2014 , 05:54 AM
yes that's what it was

i thought it was 1220 that I had in my account, and that's what I told RJ, and thats how she got her number in the first place I mixed it up with my merge account at the time

since then I haven't been able to tell her anything, she won't listen, and I went along with it for fear the damage she could do for my rep

that's where she got the 950 from

Last edited by attentionnoone; 02-06-2014 at 05:59 AM.
Jeff Bennett of Maryland, compulsive liar and thief, has now declined arbitration Quote

      
m