It's almost as if the deplorable group here never cared about free speech just wanted someone to piss off liberals.

First just note that "can" and "do" are two different things. If every non-hetero male were actively seeking a hookup all the time, then Wil's numbers would be possible for a good number of men. But they're not.

The degree to which someone can find a hookup (if they so choose) varies by location, age, attractiveness and social skills (though only minimum social skills are needed, myself being living proof). My "15 minutes" remark was for a major urban/suburban area but probably not in Real 'Murica. And even in the right location, it mostly applies to someone aged 18-35 who is in shape. Also, I've never used Grindr specifically, so maybe "15 minutes" was a bit of an exaggeration. But like, "any night of the week" is reasonable under the right circumstances. A weekend is a lock. Especially because there are even lots of "straight" guys looking for gay hookups.

The only bucket I've lumped G/B men into is that of "males". Of course, casual hookups aren't everyone's thing. Many people only get intimate with someone they're dating or might date. I can see how my previous post could have been interpreted differently, e.g. my "Find me 10 straight guys..." remark. I wasn't being totally serious with that, but in general I would say males are horny and DTF. Idk if we're hornier than females, but for one, there isn't the cultural slut-shaming of males, so a nonreligious male can be DTF without feeling ashamed (nor should they).

And then even single people who aren't sexually reserved have jobs and hobbies other than sex, so they still might not have tons of sex.

Others might have tons of sex but with the same FWB's, hence not have many sexual partners. In fact I think that's what most of the hookup-seekers hope to find, a steady fwb or few.

Edit: Oh yeah, ain't even close! If sexuality were a choice, any other choice would be completely illogical. Actually these days the term for me is pansexual, but a lot of times I just say bi because it's close enough and people know what bi means.

This whole thread was about using violent and illegal means to object. No one was against peaceful protesters or those not giving people a platform through legal means.

The not so funny thing is the deplorables are the ones who were really pissed off. They (were) livid. How dare those SJWers "deplatform" !!!1! Shame, shame on those peaceful protesters for happening to be near vandals, or getting in the way of a bullet !!!1! It's the illeberal libruls run amok again !!!1!

I don't think a deplorable can truly be happy if he's not livid at the libruls.

No it isn't.

One person breaks a window - entire protest is invalidated. That's the rules.

Might want to read the OP again.

Please cite where any defender of free speech was against someone peacefully protesting.

FYP. See BLM.

His money has clearly made him happy.

Wait, you and I are about the same age, IIRC. (I'm 44.) So wil is ~50?

Wat. I thought he was 30 or so.

Is this fake milo 13 yo pedo promo thing the same as Kim Cattrall excusing an actual pedo/child rapist or Woopie Goldberg defending an actual pedo/child rapist or even Meryl Streep being sorry that an actual pedo/child rapist is in jail as well as even leading a standing ovation for afforementioned actual pedo/child rapist?? (Roman Polanski)

Just wondering




BTW, video proof... but my man chez is afraid of actual facts and truth (no fault of his own obv), so I aint posting it... truth is a menace I heRd

You sir are an idiot.

Because actresses defend Polanski doesn't mean we all share their view, and you had to dig up something occurred 40 years ago that still doesn't prove any point.

Idiot for asking a question?

LOL thats adorable snowflake, now run along and find kerolol. Youre better than us dirty meanies!

Nope. You're an idiot because somewhere inside your lizard brain you thought you had a question that was interesting.

NQ, you're not mean you are either a troll or mentally ill. This is why you believe in the illuminati/sandy hook truther/other crazy stuff.

Not sure what either of those two said. Only Goldberg incident I remember was her defending Cosby and I thought that resulted in a mass "Look how quickly the left turn on each other" but it's interesting to see the narrative change over time.

As his age has given him wisdom and patience.

lol, what a douche.

Glad you're enjoying life though. You know as dirty Asians, Koreans were blanket banned from immigrating to the US until the Hart-Celler act and yet here you are supporting a blanket ban on all Muslims. The irony of this is probably lost on you. At least when Milo makes homophobic statements, he's just doing it for attention.

He's at least mid 40s according to what he has said itt. Can you imagine how angry he will be at 60? 70?

Just pathetic.

The funny thing is I basically have the equivalent of two well paying full-time jobs right now. I forget wil's exact number that he felt the need to brag about so much. But I might be over it. But he'd probably try to weasel out because 2 jobs doesn't count or something.

Not worth it but holy cow how can an adult with kids be so immature? Wil have you been tested for brain syphilis?

Are people with brain syphilis a vulnerable protected group?

You can't put a price on not being Wil.

Nah it's free to not be a horrible, obtuse, scummy human being.